Archived threads in /his/ - History & Humanities - 25. page
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
A lot of cultures depict Jesus in their own image. Do you think this picture is the Lord's son? what do you believe he looked like?
>>1401293
Some brown semite. But that wouldn't draw in the fans like this guy right here.
do american rednecks ever stop to consider that jesus was in fact a sand nigger
do they honestly believe he looked like the usual anglo depiction
>>1401293
The fact that he was a Near Easterner doesn't mean he had to be ugly like the troll in your pic.
What was the origin of White Guilt? Was it began after WW II?
>>1385769
It seems like the direct result of the whole White Man's Burden line of thinking that was popular in the late 19th and early 20th century. In fact, I'd say that White Guilt is just the White Man's Burden taken to it's logical conclusion.
>>1385769
It was definitely after WWII, as far as its etymology is concerned. While >>1385820
makes an interesting connection with the White Man's Burden (cf. Rudyard Kipling - http://legacy.fordham.edu/halsall/mod/kipling.asp), the two concepts are inverse in their relationship, as White Guilt is a manifestation of responsibility for historical mistreatment, while the White Man's Burden is actually a colonialist approach to the "burden" of so-called enlightened...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>1385769
White Guilt is just a culturally acceptable way for white people to feel superior in the 21st Century.
>silly black man you can't be racist only evil white people can be racist
>What do you mean your ancestors were enslaved by rival tribes long before we got there? Don't be stupid, black people did nothing of the sort, they were noble and peaceful and at one with nature until evil white man crossed the oceans with our advanced but evil ships to enslave you
Tell me about the Klan.
alright
Fuck it
Why do they wear the mask
I want to pollute her pure white genes.
There's like 2000 of them and they're all in Tennessee.
ITT: We post bait
>>1413627
This picutre is true however
>>1413627
Most of the Muslim dots are skirmishes and raids...don't forget the Christian ones in the Balkans, Iberia and Egypt you fuck
>>1413631
>no fourth crusade
>632-1920 compared to 1090-1260
>every muslim battle vs first 3 crusades
Was colonialism bad ?
>>1412625
I want you to go to archive.moe and read any of the 500 threads starting with a picture of the continent of africa before you shit up this board any more, please and thank you
How comes sub-saharan Africa never developped?
>>1412639
jungles are shit for civilization
How did this wall keep anyone out?
>>1401986
What wall is it?
>>1402007
read the file name, you silly billy
It got dismantled after the Romans left
>'It's a very good thing that there are yellow French people, black French people and brown French people. It's a sign that France is open to all races and that it has a universal vocation. But on condition they stay a minority. If not, France wouldn't be France anymore. After all, we are an European people from white race, Greek and Latin culture, and Christian religion. Try to mix oil and vinegar together. Shake the bottle. After a while, they get separated again. The Arabs are the Arabs, the French are the French. Do you believe...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>1415272
I hope your family dies in a car accident.
>>1415323
i hope white people all get bred out and we're just left with delicious brown girls
oh wait
that's already happening :^)
>gf is a xtian
>still pretty smart and well-read in philosophy, she even taught herself German and now reads Nietzsche and schop in original
>get her to read Stirner
>after she finishes him I ask her opinion
>she says not really profound
>ask what she means
>she says, well, according to him, you'd be spooked if an attractive woman wanted to have sex with...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>according to him, you'd be spooked if an attractive woman wanted to have sex with you and you refused even though you wanted to, because it would be wrong to cheat on me
But that's wrong. Cheating is not always acting in self-interest, since you will lose your partner if he/she finds out.
>>1413472
That's what I ended up telling her, "Obviously not if there's a chance you'd find out."
>she says, well, according to him, you'd be spooked if an attractive woman wanted to have sex with you and you refused even though you wanted to, because it would be wrong to cheat on me
>because it would be wrong
This part is the spook.
You might refuse because it wouldn't benefit you.
You might refuse because you don't want to upset your girlfriend.
Those would be non-spooked reasons not to cheat.
*yawwwwwn*
Oh hey there peasantcuck, didn't see you there. I've been too busy translating The Holy Bible into English these days. Wait, what's that? The Lord of the Manor just took his lawful right on your maiden wife? Don't cry peasantcuck and tile those fields. you really don't want His Lordship getting angry at you.
Anyway peasantcuck, another day, another shilling. Don't forget going to Church this Sunday,.
>>1415341
exquisite meme
>>1415341
>The Lord of the Manor just took his lawful right on your maiden wife?
Speaking of memes
>Sir Chad takes the last of your potatoes
Has anyone ever had the idea to breed together the European monarchs? Even if it never happened I am surprised no one had the idea. within a few generations you could have a unifying Personal Union of Europe.
>>1416959
>>1416959
That's what Europe generally was prior to WW1.
Prove to me that baltic and slavic languages arent the closest to PIE. (hint:you cant)
>>1416716
>(hint:you cant)
Childish bait rhetoric
Is OP going to provide OC to support his position?
>>1416716
They are Satemic whereas PIE was Centum.
>>1416716
What's with the /his/ obsession with Proto-Indo Europeans?
"Congrats you were the original gangsters, here's your award."
In the light of the terrorist attacks in Nice, I've been thinking.
Are there any historical terrorist attacks that have actually engendered substantial political change?
Reason I'm wondering is because we all know that in the 19th century, anarchists also committed a lot of terrorist acts because they believed in the propaganda of the deed; that people would be moved to change their opinion about politics or ideology in general if one could see someone actually doing something real.
But is that actually true? Can you actually change people's...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
>>1416133
wait another 5 years and we can talk about 9/11
>>1416133
>Are there any historical terrorist attacks that have actually engendered substantial political change?
Does killing a ruler of a nation big enough change for you?
Franz Ferdinand and Alexander II were both killed by terrorists
>>1416175
>Princip was a terrorist
nice meme fuckface
the revolution of 1776 was a terrorist act against the uk
ITT: only philosophers who were right about fucking EVERYTHING
literally just a flowery eloquent 19th century version of a typical /r9k/ poster
Kant
Nietzche
[Philosophers I like]
>our empirical senses cannot be relied, this entire existence you call reality might all just be an illusion you created for yourself
>therefore, the only thing that can indeed be said to exist is the precursor of these thoughts, ergo, your mind
How does one refute this?
It makes absolute perfect sense.
>>1411352
Even if the entirety of existence is merely an illusion conjured up by your own mind you can exert no real conscious control over it.
You will never be able to know if any possible brain in a jar scenario is true or false as the concept is pretty much unfalsifiable.
It offers no useful predictions and all other theories are still capable of making useful predictions that line up with this imaginary world.
You ultimately can't refute it but you can still choose to not care about its' possibility.
>>1411352
Also, God.
If a benevolent God exists, like that of Christianity, then reality as a whole also exists. It's the only way to escape Descartes' nightmare.
Both of the above replies.
/thread
Why was this man so bad?
>>1408816
He wasn't that very bad, mostly incompetent I believe.
http://iranpoliticsclub.net/history/reza-shah/index.htm
Maybe this will give you some insight.
But on his defence:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OaOFPzNfXmA
He was very well aware of what is going out, certainly.
First they deposed his dad, elevated Mossadeq, then toppled him and gave power to son, then fund the fanaticism against Persia-Iran... Did it turned out against them or out to expecations?
Pahlavi, original...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SAVAK
>>1408816
He was an American.
