>>20041
Muslims cannot do wrong. This is fact.

File: widow sadfrog.jpg (11 KB, 480x360) Image search: [Google]

11 KB, 480x360

>you will never know the pure triumph of throwing back the Muslim hordes and holding the gates of Vienna

He explicitly said at the end he'd cover Cambyses and eventually up to Alexander.

But yeah, I enjoyed it.

His WW1 series is kind of amazing.

>>20024
oh alright then

it doesn't have a "number one" on it so I guess I assumed wrong

>>19711
Because we have all seen the infographics a million times.

I don't think anyone disputes that it's related to history, it's just a loaded topic on 4chan and should be banned for the sake of quality discussion.

It attracts /pol/ like shit to a fly or dried soda on the floor to an ant

go to bed /pol/ sage and reported

File: 1231.jpg (628 KB, 2337x3372) Image search: [Google]

628 KB, 2337x3372

>>19651
>mfw i get to drive by his house almost everyday

>>19722
>discussion about the american civil war is not history

You're fucking retarded.

What the fuck kind of questions are those?

your homework gave me cancer

>>19634
Just engaging the modern student

:^)

French and Indian war. That's about it. What do you learn about America?

>>19601
As best as i can from memory
>Roanoke/Jamestown colonies
>Thirteen Colonies (new england)
>Constitution Signed
>war for independence 1776
>War of 1812 (1814 funnily enough, we invade maine)
>Civil war 1864/Manifest destiny/Alaska purchase
>At some point, spanish-american war happens
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>20157
When and where did you go to school? I didn't learn nearly any of that.

The special snowflake syndrome

File: 3.jpg (98 KB, 605x828) Image search: [Google]

98 KB, 605x828

Painting the eiffel tower

>>19164
>Kidnapped little boys
Indeed

>>19206
Say what you will about the Ottomans, but they were true boipucci connoisseurs.

>>19206

RAHHH TO MAKE THEM INTO GREAT WARRIORS YAAAHH JUST THINKING ABOUT WARRING GIVES ME A GREAT ANIMALISTIC HARD-ON!!!!

File: soviet.png (500 B, 16x11) Image search: [Google]

500 B, 16x11

This is what a Soviet flag would look like.

Every flag is "historical" and are mostly a modern invention for the revolutionary age.

In of these threads I piped up about wanting various symbols as options. (for /pol/) I don't care to advertise what country I'm posting from OR what country/flag I may like

But history isn't about dividing people up into our favourite period or region. It's about the facts and stories of the past. What symbol do we have for marxist historiography Annales school historiography? Nada.

So, no vote for me.

Flags that represent your area of expertise could be cool. Like a flag library that users could choose from with ancient civilizations as well.

>>18895
they were atheists and attacked church officials/killed priests who refused to submit.

>>18895
They were Jewish.
They believed in Judaism for themselves but atheism for the proletariat

>>18917
Christian Churches yes, but not Synagogues

File: he right.jpg (139 KB, 600x404) Image search: [Google]

139 KB, 600x404

>>18893
Fuck makes you think I haven't?

Nihilist reporting in

>>18893
Can we clarify burn out? The most accepted model of the universe is that it will continue to expand indefinitely. Matter on the Grand scheme will become more and more diluted. Eventually virtually all energy will be locked inside dead stars, and that the universe will drop to a temperature near 0K. Of course there are also theories that allow for the possibility of a contracted universe (big crunch) as well as options for black holes to release all their energy back into the universe. Of course, I'm not schooled enough...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>18844
only japs think that it didnt happen

>>18844
Yes, it did. It's a little tricky to calculate numbers on it because all the Japanese records on it were burned towards the very end of the war, but it certainly occurred and 40-300k citizens died, depending on who you believe.

>>18844
Go home Shinzo Abe.

And you can take Hiroshima with you.

sage and reported

>>18778
what's wrong?

>>18764
>Did he renounce these ideas and shift his ideology

His idealogy changed when he made his pilgrimage to Mecca and saw everyone regardless of skin color praying together, realizing that racial problems stem from differences between cultures and not something inherent. The Nation of Islam didn't like that because they always preached about the White Devil, so a bunch of members of the NoI shot him.

>>18697
The British Empire would not have existed where it not for the Norman conquest.

>brought true fuedalism to the still semi tribal Anglo Saxons
>truly entrenched interest in the Roman Empire in English nobility, leading to much of the inspiration for British Imperialists
>expanded the English language greatly
>seizure of the throne by William I and integration of Normandy into the K. of England...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.

Both
Before Normans the English were just Anglo-Saxons.
They were germanic, did not use horses, had a loose feudal system that had early forms of representation. That would later reappear as the Parliament
The Normans who were frenchified northmen introduced french, and thereby more Latin, forms of feudalism with your classic dukes and barons. Big castles, horses, chivalry, all that good stuff.
It also would fuel the blossoming french-english relationship as sharing a land border would.
But yeah William the Conqueror also killed a bunch of rebels and burned some...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>18697
The Normans are what made England relevant.

Greeks

Ancient Rome on the account that the Punic Wars were just damn awesome.

>>18694
Old Sumeria personally. I guess mostly because of the mystique of being the crib of human civilization. It makes even what little we know right now feel more weighty.