Archived threads in /his/ - History & Humanities - 11. page
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
>The queue on the opening day of the first McDonald's restaurant in Moscow, 1990.
>>1422796
Burgered.
Soft power sure is something isn't it?
>>1422796
Holy fuck, I just lost a lot of respect for Russians.
Then again, they were probably starving from being under gommunism for so long.
What are some good explicit rape paintings like pic related.
>>1422765
This is a serious thread. Please don't post that.
>>1422772
For u.
>>1422765
Sauce that shit famalam.
Can we talk about the 14th amendment?
Was it successfully ratified?
Is it legitimate?
??
Yes. Why wouldn't it be?
>>1422526
do you think this could be used to tell California to fuck off with their gun restrictions?
Was cao cao really a villain?
He was a grade A dickhead
Only to Shupporters
Was Lu Bu really a traitorous, disloyal cunt?
>but muh Zoroastrianism!!!
Does anyone really believe this fucking meme?
>>1422176
Wtf are you even talking about?
>>1422176
Cult of Aten, too.
Even Freud agrees.
Stay buttmad christard or chaim.
![13631655_10153759731998603_5193228249735168958_n[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/nAGNMjx.jpg "13631655_10153759731998603_5193228249735168958_n[1].jpg")
Which fallacy does the first reply exhibit? Fallacy of composition, fallacy of association, hasty generalization, some kind of confusion of sufficiency and necessity fallacy?..... "It did not happen to me, therefore it doesn't happen." what an asshole
You should be concentrating on the post by Trump, and the original post of this thread, which are textbook examples of the Faggot OP Fallacy.
>>1422077
Playing violent games may be a part of what creates the school shooting classics America knows and loves, but it's absurd to pin all the blame on them.
are you legitimately butthurt over somebody on twitter making fun of your hero? and why post it on /his/?
>Nothing is True
1 Thessalonians 5:21
Everything is Permitted
>Galatians 5:13, 17-18
>>1422010
Would you classify the first statement as true?
>>1422027
Nothing is True is supposed to contradict itself into getting you to test everything, even the statement itself, do be discerning of truth.
Taking it as a renouncing of objective truth is retarded and completely missing the point
>>1422027
Obviously not. Nothing is true, therefore, everything is permitted.
How will humanity deal with the looming energy hyper-crisis?
We won't.
>>1421925
how is this /his/ related
N U K E
U
K
E
Has there ever been a successful government that has been far left/progressive?
As only a casual reader of history, it seems to me all populist or "people's" movements all eventually implode because the ideology is inherently self-defeating. Am I missing something?
Also, I don't want to make this a modern "left vs right" debate, please. this isn't /pol/.
>>1421851
Define successful, far-left, and progressive.
There are plenty of very famous reformers that fit into the Whig historical narrative.
>>1421851
Bismarcks Germany
>>1421851
>far left/progressive
The problem is that today's definition of "left/progressive" is entirely different from that of history. A libertarian is often times considered to be right-wing today, yet libertarianism was extremely leftwing/progressive when it was founded during the Enlightenment. Therefore, this whole dichotomy is stupid and serves no purpose other than fooling the populace into picking left or right.
The United States and the French Republic both considered...
Comment too long. Click here to view the full text.
![2000px-Six_Day_War_Territories.svg[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/HyFbPkr.png "2000px-Six_Day_War_Territories.svg[1].png")
