>>973233
a lot of my shit is under resolution limit so I'll have to reorganize and come back soon
Honest question. Did these type of things happen in the old days? Not male slave owner but female.
>>973384
Well in the USA blacks were treated poorly, but in Europe(where slavery was illegal) black women were accepted as respected mistresses by loads of European gentlemen, there is even a documentary on youtube about it.
So I guess there must have been white women who partook in it as well.
Black women were far more common in Europe than black men.
>>973387
>here is even a documentary on youtube about it.
Post it anon.
>but in Europe(where slavery was illegal
But it was legal in America?
>Black women were far more common in Europe than black men.
Which is weird as they would have given birth to half black sons.
>>973396
>But it was legal in America?
Uh, Yeah
>>973400
That's weird. My teachers taught me that America was always ahead of the world in social movements and it was our influence that created a butterfly effect throughout it.
Do you have a source for this?
>>973401
My teachers taught me that America was always ahead of the world in social movements
lol no, certain European countries banned slavery before the Atlantic trade even began.
The Croats did it in 1415, the Poles in the 16th century .etc.
The UK Empire did it over 60 years before the US, which is why there were loads of black women treated as proper female citizens by European men in the British Empire.
The mother of Mary Seacole was one of them and she is a product of that relationship;
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Seacole
There were loads of such black women with white men.
>>973444
>What was the attitudes towards Black males/white females during that time?
Not acceptable.
White men were alpha men back then.
Any form of challenging their complete top status was a big no no.
>>973401
Lololololkekekekekek
Dumb as fuck brainwashed americunt!
You lot are all thick as pig shit.
>>973862
That's what happens when you let Texas write the textbooks.
>>973401
part of the reason we won the civil war was Europe could not support the Confederate "slavery forever" States of America since most of them outlawed it. if they did they would be hypocrites. so instead they stayed out of it or supported the north.
Does anyone have the link to the photo on the top of the page?
>>973328
sauce ? name?
Thx
>>973410
Britain banned slavery in 1833/1838
>>973368
anything on this?
i got a new fetish
>>973234
fishhooks are against unified MMA-rules!
>>973401
Most of Europe banned SLAVERY. Note that serfdom were still in effect in Russia till the revolution if memory serves.
We were also often racist as fuck. Look up the Belgium genocide in Congo.
We are talking millions of dead.
