Cross Eyed Images
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /h/ - Hentai
You are currently reading a thread in /h/ - Hentai
Post stereoscopic images here, try to find new stuff that isn't in the old thread >>4194452
This is easily my favorite image.
The cock is drawn so wonderfully that I'm almost gay for it. Maybe even full gay.
>>4240895
Mirrors don't work in 3D.
>>4240901
Mirrors completely works in 3D. Just use the reflection has an actual object.
>>4240895
Is this good enough?
>>4240904
It's just a simple copy paste... no depth at all.
>>4240904
It always amazes me how people think 3D works. Please be a brick joke.
>>4240907
how is it done although? do you guys do it with some kind of program or something?
>>4240987
The easiest way that I've seen is done with photoshop or a similar paint program that supports layers. I don't actually have the tutorial image, maybe another anon has it.
>>4241021
This one ?
>>4240895
Well I made a quick version 1, will post a better version "soon" (might be tomorrow, might be a few days)
>>4241094
Also made a slightly improved version of one I posted in the earlier thread.
I dont understand, how am I supposed to look at these
>>4241094
wasn't satisfied with that one, already made one with much more depth, but still needs a lot work to be finished - later.
>>4241053
Yeah.
Firstman's work looks awful. He uses images save off google which in turn has been resaved 100 times as a jpg.
Look at this shit from the last thread >>>4237798
>>4241409
the good news is that you can easily tell which ones are his
>>4241409
Funny, this >>4231286 one looks good but made for ants.
>>4241460
>hurr durr better convert this nappy headed hoe to 3D
C'mon man, really? 1st man please.
>>4240158
fixed
>>4241466
>Using Oculus-book.
>>4240160
anyone got the original of this?
>>4240158
bump
>>4243712
Do the a deals a deal picture of just the brunette. And make it into a 3DS picture too.
What are those images for? I dont get the pont of it...since there's this picture from OP I kinda can guess what's itsupposed to do...so do you have to look at the center of the image or what? I don't get it...or do you need some software ti watch it, or put your phone in those carton glasses stuff??
srsly help me xD
>>4243744
I actually just wanted to know if you get this effect by simply starring at the image :D
thanks for the link, though
>>4243752
Yes you can, http://starosta.com/3dshowcase/ihelp.html
>>4243764
haha, that's fun xDD
though, my eyes hurt now and I cannot keep this up for long...one second...maybe even less.....
does it keep being blurry ? I mean you want to focus away from the screen right? so can iteven be a bit sharper?
>>4243989
>xDD
What are you twelve?
You improve with practice, don't strain or overextend yourself for too long, treat it like running or some other type of physical exercise.
editfag from the last thread here, taking requests
I'll also probably/maybe come up with some originals of my own choice later on
>>4244417
>>4241114
Thanks dude. I appreciate it.
>>4244523
Here, I'm not one to judge.
>>4244559
Thanks, I didn't know if you would actually make it.
>>4244559
this shits the best
>>4244557
You're welcome. But I probably won't work on it any further, too much work at the time to make it perfect.
Instead two new ones.
>>4244646
And...
>>4244647
And the next one
>>4245269
Needs more aspect ratio
>>4240184
I FUCKING DID IT.
I was never able, EVER, to see these kind of images properly. But using my finger as a point of reference and getting it close to my eyes (until I saw the background images merge) I was able to achieve it.
>>4245309
Congrats mang
>>4240158
dumping my collection
>>4245326
>>4245328
>>4245329
>>4245332
>>4245334
>>4245336
>>4245339
>>4245341
>>4245342
>>4245304
As in...? I'm quite happy with the aspect ratio, since its one of my fewer pictures that aren't that wide and thus easier to look at.
On a related note: My latest work
>>4245328
Fake one : It's a simple copy paste.
OC
HOLY SHIT I FINALLY DID IT
Is this shit bad for me because my eyes kinda hurt now.
Also can someone please make my waifu 3D?
>>4245374
Dunno, did it quite easily on at the first run, only had to google, how to do it. Doesn't hurt my eyes
>>4245374
I've never had any issues crossing my eyes, and by now I can cross them pretty much instantly. Been doing it for months on end, and I haven't noticed any impairments. But the first time around, and also when doing it for a longer time than what you're used to, your eyes do start to hurt a bit. It's probably wise to take a break at that point.
This still doesn't work for me in PC, only works when I'm on mobile
I can't manage to focus on the thir image, FUCK
In a few years, people will look back at this stuff and shake their heads in disgust. Just like we do at flip books when comparing them to actual animation.
>>4245819
You don't "cross" your eyes to look at that kind of stuff. You uncross them, so they both look straight at the image in front of them, instead of focusing on a single one.
I'll never get why people think they cross them. Your left eye isn't trying to look at the right-side image.
>>4248791
>Your left eye isn't trying to look at the right-side image.
You sure about that, buddy?
>>4248791
http://www.angelfire.com/ca/erker/freeview.html
>Learning to Cross Eye Freeview: In cross eye freeviewing the image for the left eye is on the right and the image for the right eye is on the left. You stare at a point about 1/2 way to the screen so that your eye's gaze is crossing at the half way point. Thus the left eye sees the correct image which is on the right. As you cross your eyes the image will go double. When your eyes are crossed the correct amount the middle images will overlap and be in 3d. The two outer images will remain and will be in 2d.
>>4248791
But anon, it's called cross-eye for a reason because that's exactly how you view it. Here look at the picture, if you cross your eyes the bottom one will pop out and the top should be inversed and the reverse should be true for a parallel, or as you called it "uncrossed," picture.
I don't understand how you could view everything parallel ITT and not notice that every picture has the background popping out and the parts closest popping in.
>>4248785
But people don't shake there head in disgust about flip-books? They still serve a purpose as entertainment for children. I think that free-view stereoscopic will still hold in the relative popularity because all you need to view it are your eyes and a screen. VR peripherals can be used for this, but their main purpose is not usually to be a glorified stereoscope or View Master.
>>4243380
wow - this is... godly.
Gonna save this
Hey fags, I made one of these. I feel like I'm finally giving back to the community.
>>4241114
Nice job. Personally I like the first one a little better though. It has less depth but in the second one her right heel and ear in the reflection don't match up quite right.
>>4251523
saved
>>4243380
This always ends up being incredibly blurry to me. Do I just keep practising? I've gotten down the 3D
>>4251547
From what I've seen, less depth is often a good thing. It seems people get too caught up in injecting as much contrast as possible, rather than making it as realistic or believable as possible. Hair is probably the best example, bangs shouldn't be two feet away from her face. Another example would be breasts that are extruded cylinders, rather than actually round.
>>4251580
The same happens to me if I try it with my laptop. I got no problem when i use my phone tho. Does that happen to anyone too?
I can't cross my eyes. :(
>>4251580
it really is a practice thing, don't know if its actually good for your eyes though, it always makes mine tired. But with the higher quality ones just try to line it up long enough and you eye will catch on to it, you can get it so you could actually forget you're crossing your eyes
>>4252359
In the short term you may fatigue your eyes if they aren't used to it. I haven't found anything that says it will cause long term damage.
this gem if somebody wants to do it
>>4253566
O god yes
>>4253566
will deliver, already started working on it ;)
>>4245364
So I'm back after a break. Delivering the request of
>>4253566
Great picture for this kind of thing ;)
>>4256206
>>4256206
And another quick one. Not really satisfied with the end result, but probably won't bother to continue working on it.
>>4252566
This one is amazing
>>4252359
I used this picture to practise, and now I can see pics perfectly within 10 seconds. It's like a whole new world to me.
Hey. I don't know what you are doing, and how to play those pictures. Maybe do I need 3ds? I don't have 3ds...
>>4256912
Your left eye has to look at the right pic and right eye at left pic. Slightlh cross your eyes until the tqo pictures lap together. No, ylu don't need a 3DS
>>4256206
Maybe due to its size, but this one was surprisingly hard for me.
>>4257507
yeah wider pictures are sometimes pretty difficult. It helps if you move away from the screen a bit. Alternatively this resized version might work.
>>4257134
Sorry not my taste so I won't do it.
>>4257583
oh and I found an uncensored version of this pic, probably will do an updated version relatively soon
>>4240158
HOLY FUCKING SHIT
THIS IS AMAZING
tip to anyone who doesn't get it, just cross your eyes until the images combine
looks like all those years of practice crossing my eyes as a kid paid off
Anyone have manga pages converted?
>>4257720
>>4257836
>>4257837
>>4257842
>Keystroke Keystroke Keystroke Keystroke
what do you mean by this?
>>4257844
It's the sound effect that fappers make when browsing gelbooru
>>4257844
>>4257846
okay
>>4257842
What, you don't have a fetish for jpg artifacts, watermarks, and bad scans?
WIll stereo images be viewed like in this in a few years? Or will they be replaced by VR-gfs?
>>4259954
>he thinks VR will take off
PffffttHAHAHAAHAH
>>4259954
Depends on how many years "a few" is.
>>4257836
Manga turns out surprisingly well
>>4257583
After some effort, I can do it now, but thanks anyway for helping a brother out!
>>4244523
Fuck you anon, you spooked my erection away
Doing mangas like this is a lot of fun, actually.
>>4263520
This is just great
Being blind as a bat makes these so easy to do when I take out my contacts.
>>4256906
I feel like fucking robot being able to control my vision like this
>>4244646
kept thinking i was focusing my eyes wrong because it was still kind of blurry.
then I realized it was censored.
you faggot.
>>4263520
Holy shit this one turned out amazing
>>4263520
Do you think this works on all doujins? And if so, are you willing to do one in exchange for a translation script?
>>4266781
In theory it should work for every doujin, though my rather limited set of PS abilities puts a limit to what I can and cannot do. The fan-colored page was easy to do (if a lot of work on the retouching) because the colors aren’t hard to copy. Take the attached picture as an example. It’s unedited in that I only put in the depth aspect and have not yet filled in the resulting white space, and I don’t really know how to simulate the dot-structure the artist uses in the background. (Most notably in the top panel.)
That’s pretty much the ceiling I hit so far.
But here are the other two doujin pages I tried. All from Sahara Wataru
>>4266884
Not him and I don't use Photoshop because I'm a weaboo and use Clipstudiopaint instead but in Clipstudiopaint you can generate the dot-structure you're talking about on demand. They literally have a feature to generate dot-structures built into it. Pic very related.
If anybody wants to do this on easy mode, buy a google cardboard and download the "clover" app. The images work perfectly together with the VR set.
>>4266980
>Buying something when you can just cross your eyes
>>4267104
>spending $5 for easy mode
>>4267164
If you put in any effort for practice, crossing your eyes becomes so easy. For instance all of the challenges at http://www.spotthedifference.com/explorer.asp are trivial, even the moving ones, until they start introducing the word and mirrored challenges.
>>4267203
>http://www.spotthedifference.com/explorer.asp
Pretty sweet application
>>4257660
>http://www.spotthedifference.com/explorer.asp
>>4256906
guys i can barely do it, i know it takes time, but right now i see THREE perfectly clear images, the middle sticks out more, but the left and right give more vibrant color, using the watch index finger trick then trying to focus, ends up as.... 3.
>mfw this thread
>>4269295
if that's yf then you're doing it wrong, you're supposed to cross your eyes not go wall-eyed
>>4271304
Requesting original if you'd be so kind.
>>4272113
I don't know if that image is up to quality but you could just cut it and take the left half, which seems to be unedited.
Why is this so hard? Fuck me.
>>4273391
With pleasure!
*unzips dick*
These are cool.
I am new to this, and they are still blurry when I'm doing this on my laptop, but its fine on my phone.
Does anyone have more webms/gifs?
Quick question about these
I never really managed to do this
Am I supposed to merge the two images into one in the middle
Or am I supposed to get it so they overlap on both sides
>>4275444
http://www.angelfire.com/ca/erker/freeview.html
http://starosta.com/3dshowcase/ihelp.html
>>4275367
I made this for retards like me who cant cross their eyes. I can take some requests but not all images will look good this way. dunno if people are interested.
Does anyone else find the images appear much smaller when crossing your eyes than when looking at them normally? It's as if they are half the size or something.
>>4275548
so awesome do the ones you like from this thread
>>4275548
That is great except for the nose imo, just needs a little touch up
>>4275603
I don't really 'make' them. I just make already cross eye images in to a gif. I can't do much about that sorry.
>>4275548
Tried to improve it : Feet free to make a gif out of it.
It would be nice to view these images on 3DS as stereo images.
Oh well.
>>4277382
Most of these aren't well made see >>4275548 for example, her right eye lashes for some reason are higher than her nose and other eye. Like what was the converter's train of thought? Wouldn't look any different on a 3DS. And even if they are well made like >>4277230 (No more weird depth relations, pic related) the image itself isn't in 16:9 ratio. Literally none of these are. >>4243380 This one you'd either get her face and miss the penetration or get the penetration and miss the face.
>>4277419
Since I'm bored I made a gif better explaining the aspect ratio problem.
With this image on a 3DS you'd either only see his penis ejaculating which is full homo or just her face which is rather boring.
>>4277433
What if you make the image sideways?
>>4277541
Why are you only able to view one at a time? It the lower screen on a 3ds in bad quality? Is it not possible to include controls to zoom out or manipulate the image in some way?
>>4277705
I don't know why, it just isn't possible. Add zoom out and pan to the images? Seems like to make that possible you'd need to be a hacker.
>>4277419
Why not resize the picture and adding black borders to get the good ratio ?
>>4278012
The screen is too fucking small, you could hardly see anything if re-sizing and it wouldn't look nice because 50% of the screen would be wasted space. Here is a mock-up, how it would look in real life. In conclusion, landscape images look better on 3DS while portrait images look better crosseye'd.
>>4278025
I suppose the only way is to make the picture rotated to 90°... which can be weird to look at and actually need to redo the stereoscopic process.
If you want to easily make side by side images, just go to http://www.ofoct.com/combine-images-side-by-side and upload the image two times and click merge, I have tried it and was happy with the results. Enjoy!
>>4279533
And this is why we got some false stereoscopic pictures by learning stupid tricks like that... copy paste a single picture don't create any depth at all ><
>>4279533
the placebo effect is strong with this one
>>4279553
But what if I am using Cardboard? Is it still worth it to take the extra time to create a stereogram?
>>4279640
It's worth it, fire up Photoshop and start getting gud at making these stereograms.
>>4279648
What images are good as in "starter" images? You know, the images that can be easily made into stereograms.
>>4279685
Those 3DS images don't seem to have a background most of the time. So anything without a background.
wow that a even retard way to fap
>>4280200
You don't happen to have a source for that, do you? Doing a google search just comes up with "clothing"
>>4280221
Anon are you okay?
>>4260722
The two images look different and is throwing me off one of the heads looks smaller
>>4247636
This image makes no sense. Look where her boobs are in relation to her shoulder.
Any websites where I can find videos/webms/gifs like this?
How can I make this type of images?
>>4283415
And for the animated one, Blender (used for all animated one here) or any 3D modeling program.
>>4284168
Well... as far as I know, it's not really animated : it's just some sort of tricky camera move. Plus, you can't get the camera move and the stereoscopy together.
Just discovered this, anyone with a very large image ?
>>4284901
or i could fucking zoom
WOW SHIT! IT WORKED
>>4284828
you can animate still pictures with it by manipulating depthmap
gave me a picture you want to see animated and I'll try to make one
>>4284901
Are you planning on trying this on a dual monitor?
>>4284970
Feel free to use anyone you want. I'm just curious right now.
Used to think this whole cross-eyed thing was retarded until i just now figured how to use it. My dick is gonna fall off soon.
>>4285280
I keep crossing my eyes in the other threads!
>Shit! It does NOTHING!!!
Request
>>4256206
I'm back
Delivering
>>4285290
Not perfect, but there you go :)
>>4285965
And while I'm here I'll also drop this. It's not really finished yet, but quite alright ;)
>>4285965
Awesome, thank you!
>>4285108
not one from me but that would give the trick if you look at the depthmap: http://depthy.me/#/ip/DkRcj2m
>>4285965
I have to say that you're pretty good at this. Probably some of the better 2d to 3d conversions. I was wondering about how long do you spend actually making these?
>>4286062
Thanks!
Well it depends on
a) The picture: How many layers/objects, how the image is structured, there are many aspects how "difficult" an image can be
b) How much effort I want to put in. Most of the time I try to give the pictures as much depth as is possible, but there's always a trade-off between how much depth can be added without having to spend an eternity retouching it afterwards.
So for
>>4285965
This took only 1-2 hours in total. Picture was relatively easy, I wasn't hellbent on too much depth so I circumvented retouching completely.
But for most pictures it's probably more like 4+ hours, the one I'm posting right now probably took the longest so far because of retouching, I'm guessing somewhere between 6-10 hours? But I have some pictures in my to-do folder which will probably take longer, have to see when I find the time/motivation to do them ;)
>>4286443
4+ hours for a single picture and 6-10 for the last one? Damn :/
That basically the time I needed to do animated one.
>>4286443
artist name?
I laughed so hard, I can't fap to this right now, Thanks op.
is there a tutorial out there that isnt complete shit on how to do this on photoshop? i have plenty of pics i wanna convert for google cardboard.
>>4245369
good job
>>4287602
>>4287676
Or, if you are crazy enough like me, by using Blender.
>>4290544
Are you able to make both images from this? It might be easier to control the depth of everything and make details than in the photoshop tutorial.
>>4290544
Are there any examples, I mean some stereoscopic images made with that method?
>tfw I sort of want to try this but none of images from my archive are allowed in /h/
where do some of sick fucks share their craft?
>>4290903
How sick is it?
Gurochan might be your thing?
>>4290907
loli ss and homo shit
I haven't seen these 3D images in boorus too
>>4290921
Well the only places that accept loli are /b/ and /trash/.
/d/ might be fine for homo stuff as well as /y/ and I don't know offhand what ss is for or what places it would be acceptable at.
If you were planning on creating a bunch of 3d conversions I'm sure those places wouldn't mind, although /b/ might be too quick.
>>4291042
/ss/ = straight shota
>>4291042
/ss/ is loli but with little boys instead of girls. And just like loli it's only allowed on /b/.
>>4291132
>only allowed on /b/.
And /trash/
>>4290817
>he doesnt know how 3D works
If something is already in 3D then you can. Look at your index finger. Close one eye, then do the same for the other. You'll notice your vision looks slightly different. So you ARE able to make both images from a single 3D image.
>>4292809
>to make both images from a single 3D image.
In order to do 3D, you just have to do 3D... best logic ever !
>>4292809
I was referring to the artist doing the conversion controlling the depth of the image. It looks like if you modeled the image in blender it would be easier to change the depth of the images it creates, rather than dealing with multiple layers of objects and correcting any whitespace that's created like >>4241053 shows.
>>4290544
Any hints on how to do this? Looks interesting.
Requesting this fine piece of art
>>4293554
>>4296412
The way I did that was to act like you gonna make a hybrid animation (or puppet animation if you like). From that, I have different body part on different layers.
Once done, I import those layer using a personal script and, instead of applying the texture in a regular way, I use a virtual projector placed on the same location/rotation than the camera.
From that, you can use the edit tool to generate basic depth and sculpt tool to add a bit of volume and rounded shape on your layers (like breast and thick legs).
I suppose you can skip the layering part using a single picture with some depth but it's better to get at least 3 layer (background, body and breast) in order to get some basic acceptable results.
I got bored in the cleaning phrase, also looks like images with lots of bloom and blur aren't that easy to clean, especially if you don't know jackshit about art.
>>4243380
I will do this, for my dick!
I have to do this.
I did this, what do you think?
>>4298821
artist?
>>4248791
Nigger you do cross them. Believe me I'm a master at this.
>>4299628
it's not /h/ but an okay WIP.
Head needs work along with the background popping out at places and the legs seem kind of flat. There's some more but I'm sure you see them.
>>4300056
Thanks anon, i really don't where i can get feedback for something like this.
>can match two images but the depth is in reverse
Kill me.
>>4301575
Well it's a western gif so no.
>>4301606
Just reverse the left and right pictures then.
Plus, I'm quite surprised that there's not a similar thread on /aco/.
>>4301878
Make one if you have the content. I don't really want to go there.
So I finally managed to do it by using a pencil to cross my eyes. How the fuck can you concentrate on fapping without letting your eyes relax?
>>4302362
After some training your eyes will lock in automatically and it stops being so tiring.
>>4302372
nice. Guess Ill have to train to get accustomed to it
Mfw file is too large to upload.
https://imgur.com/pO6A4DP posted it here instead
