Just a little something. What do you guys think?
It's a few basic shapes in Illustrator. What am I supposed to critique here?
I know you probably worked hard on this, but that's not how design works. What purpose does this serve? Who was it made for, why, what need does it fulfill? Why did you choose those colours, why is the stem so thin, why are there random shapes cut out of the pedals, etc.
>>267765
Petals.
>>267767
I don't know man I'm a designer, not a fuckin' botanist.
>>267768
>I'm a designer
No you're not.
You posted this already.
In the already existing critique thread.
This is a slow board, there's no benefit to you spamming your shitty, half-formed "little somethings" here. You hack. You fucking hack. Oh and your flower looks like abstract garbage, and I'm not even going out of my way to be mean by saying that.
>>267771
wew lad so mad
>>267777
take the critique for what it is cunt
stop souring the vibe
>>267768
This is so ignorant. You study and learn things you want to re-create so you can achieve great results. If I wanted to draw a flower with care I would research everything I could about it so I could be faithful to it. It's the same way people study anatomy to be better at drawing.
>>267850
I'm not >>267768 but shut the fuck up with your bullshit.
The dude misspelled petals. What the fuck ever.
>>267853
He's right though...
>>267853
It's not even about the typo you dunce, look at the picture. Does that look like a fucking rose to you?
Thoughts please.
>>267881
This is a troll thread anyway. There's no way OP can take his shit seriously.
>>267765
All these questions are pointless on something so disgusting as OP's "flower". It doesn't even deserve critique or consideration, its THAT BAD.
Yeah, OP, that is one of the worst things I've seen in days, and I work with some clients that are old ladies who pencil sketch stick figure shit like this by hand daily. Give up.
>>267881
the filename literally says it's a rose
>>267957
Pls stop
