>>263492
>mysore 2016
more like eyesore 2016 amirite

It's fugly, but since it's for India (I assume) it doesn't really matter. Either way, I hope you didn't pay for that shit.

Actually quite nice. But it does need a talented designer to polish it up.

Typography is complete shit tho

>>263492
Yeah, no...

I'm going to need to you step away from the keyboard, go outside, walk to your local bookstore, pick up a book on graphic design, head to your nearest park, sit under a tree and read that book, then walk home, eat dinner, go to bed, wake up in the morning, and try again.

>>263507
It's not nice, the concept might be endearing but the execution is horrendous.

Thanks guys. Looks like it needs more work on the design itself, but the concept is OK.

>>263492
It's unreadable.
One suggestion - print your design, put it on a wall, and walk to an opposite end of a room. If you can read what's on the sign? Great! If not, start over.

Like, I can't tell - is the upper part supposed to be letters? I can't tell if it's just abstract elephant, or it's supposed to say "IDG" or perhaps "IDY" or "IOG" or "IAG" etc.

>>263492

It looks like the elephant is meant to be made out of 3 letters - I, O and something unintelligible (Q?). The composition is super messy and is in a very awkward middle ground where it barely looks like an elephant and barely makes out letters