Need help with the anti commie political logo, thinking I want to show motion from the hammer into the commie star?
>>257538
>>257538
>>257538
first thing I thought is making the star more clearly smashed.
right now it just looks like you put some scratched filter on top of it.
Maybe break it up more? Then use some tilt perspective so it looks like it's laying on the ground or something.
the motion >>257543 looks kinda silly
>>257538
This is not /pol/ you biggot.
>what are motion lines?
Got to give you some credit for turning a Fasces into a hammer though.
>>257549
Right just want to do it right - the movement effect I want to be simple to recreate for a logo and shows fast swinging
m-muh borders
1) The word border is fucking heinous, and detracts from the shit you're trying to communicate. Yeah, yeah, sure, you can bitch and whine about the concepts you want to talk about, but when you're trying to make "Smash Cultural Marxism" your focus, and your eyes aren't immediately drawn to it, you're failing.
2) That hammer icon isn't going to scale down very well. You have a lot of bullshit details that don't do anything for you.
Otherwise, what was already mentioned applies, and political designs tend to be shit anyway. Now go back to /pol/ and spew your shitty vomit elsewhere.
>>257561
Alternatives? Criticizing is easy, creating is hard.
>>257574
Here's an alternative, you fucking knob.
> go the fuck
> back to /pol/
Millennial conservative count-culture needs some new visual identity instead of anti-fa and neo-nazi knocoff symbolism.
Pic related movement is doing it sort of right, the yellow seems friendly and the graphic design is of decent quality, but still too much reminiscent of fascist symbolism imo.
>>257592
>>257592
Yeah, you need to sneak it past them so the kids don't actually know it's just an edgy version of your meth head uncle's politics.
>>257589
Shame you're such a cuck, you've got talent.
>>257596
Thanks, I'll remember that while my Hispanic girlfriend and I go vote for Sanders with our gay friends. Later, we're gonna play the new Tomb Raider and listen to Run The Jewels.
>smash
Leave this out completely imo, this is the kind of shit that SJWs and leftists are using.
Just focus on the "tradition,family..." aspect of it.
Jesus, this board gets worse more and more every day.
>>257605
People believe different things, you'll live
This is the current logo
>>257626
Again, with the outer ring of text. Fucking get rid of that, the rest of it is fine.
You didn't listen to a fucking word, did you?
>>257627
Also, secondarily, the stroke on the inside ring's words is really gross, but at least that interior portion of the logo is at least vaguely ok.
Update, thoughts?
>>258160
Yep, looks like you're still racist.
>>258160
I dont like the vertically compressed star. I dont like the swoosh lines behind the hammer, the original one without was ok, it was more readable and less clustered.
Think about this way, its should be readable(not the words but the general silhouette and forms) as the size of a thumbnail or postage stamp across the room.Generally when you do stuff stand up from the computer and take a look on it from further away. I also sometimes put things upside down to see(feel) if something works or not.
>cultural Marxism
>smash
Fuck you, OP
>>258362
>>258363
>>258478
>>258478
I like the one in your opening post the most despite what the others said, as I said in >>258182
Just wrap it up and stop tinkering around.
What about this?
(Because you apparently share the same ideas)
Get rid of the star
Get rid of the hammer
Replace with broken hammer a sickle. (sic left)
Get rid of wrapped around text.
Increase size of "smash"
>>258505
That is a specific symbol to a defeated political party in WW2 Germany.
I dont even think about that time, or any of those politicians...no one I know does
Nationalism is a great thing because it protects the people in the nation.
Socialism is only needed in as much as it is used to protect the nation - that is a good thing- Why? Because "Globalists" International Capitalists undercut people of the nation they operate in. In legal policies and financial systems.
>>258509
Good idea
have a great day!
>>258509
>>258509
>>258509
b
>>258509
Fasces Handle Hammer
>>258509
Broken H&S
>>258553
>smashing a hammer
>with another hammer
That's some shitty iconography, you have there.
Having a tilted hammer anywhere in the logo looks like you're a Marxist organization yourself.
>but anon the handle is a fasces
No one but the people in your little club are even going to get the relevance, let alone even know what the fuck it is. Unless you use imagery that has broader, immediately understandable appeal, you won't attract anyone--your repugnant ideology notwithstanding.
It's funny really, in order to "smash" cultural Marxism, you must submit to it in a lesser form.
Try thinking of new ways to symbolize the act of smashing. A fist can smash, so can a brick, etc. Or, if you're open to rebranding, you might consider synonyms for "smash" so you aren't tied down to certain kinds of images. For instance, "Crush Cultural Marxism" has nice alliteration to it, and could be followed with a crumpled hammer and sickle in a tightly closed fist.
Or you could just cut to the chase and make your logo a pile of dead black children.
>>257538
The hammer and sickle represent the working class. Got a better logo for you.
>>257538
Also your hammer is heavily reminiscent of the fasces symbol.
My 5 min effort and I'm a Marxist.
>>258727
Yup like the Lincoln memorial
>>258756
pitiable
>>258722
Being that this thread is 50/50 half-hearted critique and discussion of ideology:
I despise OP's point of view. But I want to be the guy in that image. Minus the baldness and obesity, of course. But I want wealth that removes me so far from common society that I forget what it's like not to have whatever I want at a moment's notice. I want power. Immortality.
I'm liberal in voting and mentality, and I don't think that we should be subject to a political system in which the elected officials are subject to the whims of the moneyed elite. But you can be damn sure that I want that obscene lifestyle, and I'll claw and scrape until I achieve it or I'll work myself to death in trying.
No, I don't believe any politician, Trump or Sanders or anyone between, will either aid nor hinder me. I don't expect them to. The choices a president makes are, in reality, so far removed from the ground floor of the general public that they're about as relevant to one's personal success as those of television characters.
Disagree if you like, but I operate under the assumption that an understanding of human nature and how to achieve mobility in society is more important to completing my goals than the distant influence of a ruling party.
>tl;dr NO U
>>258790
Op here
A lot of pie in the sky generalities, unfortunately you're a voter -
Read "real politik" philosophy, then things will start to make sense - like when biologists read Darwin for the first time.
>>258756
This is great.
>>258835
Thanks for the advice Derek Vinyard. If I want to manage day shift at a liquor store, I'll be sure to pick your brain for interview tips. My current agenda is a little more ambitious, (pie in the sky, as you said. Your dream of white utopia is pie in the stratosphere), and my goals might require me to actually work alongside or even employ minorities and women. I could try to build a workforce of paranoid racists, but my city already has a military surplus store.
Look at us, chasing dreams. Ain't that America?
>>258864
>Your dream of white utopia
Nope.
Cultural hegemony is what you should strive for. If you're in some "multicultural dream city", move - ASAP.
>My current agenda is a little more ambitious
Sounds exactly the opposite: quote compromising/ed
> Ain't that America
Fortunately we are not all in America.
I suggest you escape to a place that is as "white Utopian" as you can find. There are places in the US that are too forgone. you just haven't accepted that yet.
Move , and move now. Once a territory or region is "multicultural" the chances that you can reverse it are none.
Diversity is sand in the gears. Its nothing but a problem.
Now, back to the logo...
>>259046
>>257538
It's too complex. Simplify it, and of course, lose the text.
Symbolism must divulge its message by grapheme alone, not with accompanying information.
>>258160
this is shit. the old logo was shit already but still better than anything you ever did.
Have you ever swung a hammer you retard? do you know what motion it makes?
this is the reason why i never will be afraid of racists. because they can't achieve the simplest tasks.
