Is this the worst album cover art ever?
ITT: relevent albums with shitty cover art
no it is not
>>243090
Okay, the idea basic idea is solid.
But it looks just like a quick mock-up in Photoshop.
And that typeface? Are you kidding me?
If it's supposed to be ironic, it somehow missed me.
>>243091
Its avantgarde... You just dont get it
>>243091
I'd guess someone didn't want to give money for the final work
>>243094
Yeah, I'd like to believe that, but "its avantgarde" is no excuse for shitty design.
Like I said, I like the idea of particles orbiting in "atomic" patern - its nice reference to the producers name. But the execution? It looks like someone just used Brush tool with random hardness setting and went with it.
And the composition is totally off.
I have nothing against art, that is trying to look "noobish" on purpose, but ithas to hold at least some basic estetic values.
this album is good
>>243088
Probably not the worst but yes, it certainly sucks.
might've been better with colors inverted (and maybe a splash of neon colors)
>>243155
It's ridiculous how much you improved it with 2 relatively easy steps. fuckshit.
>>243702
It's just iteration. You can always push a work to make it better.
>>243088
Man, this shit is shit.
