Drones
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /g/ - Technology
You are currently reading a thread in /g/ - Technology
Hey /g/, I'm looking for a 250mm quad drone frame because I'm finally starting with drones and I'm trying to build my own, but most frames are coming from sketchy Chinese sources that'll take 2 months to ship, anyone wanna help me out? If I can find a 250mm quad frame I have a friend that can hook me up with the motors and props. Looking for a decent frame under $50.
>>54563599
why build your own when you can just buy a dji
>>54563599
Awesome OP, I started building my own too. Mine has removable/repositionable arms and is currently 160mm, but I will probably convert it over to 200mm.
Anyway, I have found www.banggood.com to have excellent prices as well as very fast shipping, and the quality of the frame I got from them is very nice.
Heres a link, they have a bunch of 250mm frames for well under $50:
http://www.banggood.com/search/carbon-frame.html
As a side note, I ordered from hobbyking as well and that order took about a month to receive. banggood only took a few days.
What other components have you went with?
>>54563657
cuz freedom
>>54563599
>drone
End you'reselfe
>>54563599
>drone
>implying quad copters are referred to as drones without the ability to fly themselves from power on
>>54567939
this
>>54567939
>>54569020
OP here. They're used interchangeably to people who aren't the edgelords of the century, just making sure everyone knows what I'm talking about.
>>54565335
I've seen the ZMR250 everywhere and seen pretty decent things about it, so that'll most likely be my pick. I'm not 100% sure which other components because he has a pile of different makes and models to show me, right now I'm just trying to get a frame down.
>>54565335
Goddamn thats a shill if i've ever seen one.
>>54569658
if you ever bought quadcopter parts youd realize what I said is true. But I guess youre just a troll
>>54569020
>>54567939
you think "drone strikes" are carried out autonomously? protip; theyre not idiot
