>>54366296
cant wait until they "invent" Apple FLAC...

>>54366311
NEW IPOD IS NOW FLAC COMPATIBLE
AS LOW A PRICE AS $1299 DOLLARS

>>54366296
>>still no flac compatibility
>JUST
Because FLAC is FOSS and its status as far as IP infringement is unknown. Its sponsors say they won't sue anyone who uses their IP but they won't indemnify anyone against third parties whao may claim that FLAC infringes. See how Microsoft was able to extort all the Android phone makers (apart from, notably, Google) for undisclosed IP infringements.
Microsoft didn't need to go to court; just the threat of litigation was enough.
Once enough people start using FLAC the sharks will gather.

>>54366311
ALAC literally exists since like 2005

>>54366311
That would be ALAC, which exists and is supported by all current Apple products.

>>54366296
>flac meme
ho boi