It is 2016 and everyone has an HD Video Camera in their pocket but NASA has NEVER supplied those who have given over a trillion dollars in tax funding, a view of their home.
This isn't asking a lot. NASA already has the International Space Station in orbit just 250 miles from earth.
I say, buy two HD 4k Camcorders and get them space ready. Then set em up and stream live 24/7 to all of humanity.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5HcoU5HTsJ0
>>54186778
http://www.ball.earth/home.html
Those cameras cost tens of thousands of dollars, and weigh possibly 20-30 pounds, meaning they'd cost upwards of $120k each, likely much more considering NASA has to purchase launch capabilities from an outside entity. NASA's shoestring budget means they have to save every penny possible for high priority projects, and needless to say pacifying some conspiracy theorists is not a high priority.
This is not to mention the fact that the bandwidth from the ISS is extremely limited, and even live missions can only be streamed in 360p if at all, so your high-quality 4k video would be useless. You'd be lucky if you were able to get one day's worth of worth of video downloaded each month, making your several hundred thousand dollar camera setup useless.
But I doubt you'll respond to any of these points, and instead you'll call me a brainwashed drone and dismiss my points.
And we will never see it;
Because Earth is Flat.
>>54187332
kill yourself back to >>>/pol/
>>54187413
Notice how the lightning seems 'real-time', while nasa says it's a time-lapse.
Nasa has been selling us fake space missions and beautiful CGI of our earth, planets and solar system.
>>54186778
Upcoming 24/7 livestream directed by Stanley Kubrick?
>>54187130
>Those cameras cost tens of thousands of dollars, and weigh possibly 20-30 pounds, meaning they'd cost upwards of $120k each
>NASA's shoestring budget means they have to save every penny possible for high priority projects
Nigger, the brought a fucking gorrilla suit to the ISS. Don't tell me $120k for a camera is bad investment.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/science-video/12171184/Is-that-a-gorilla-on-the-International-Space-Station.html
>You'd be lucky if you were able to get one day's worth of worth of video downloaded each month, making your several hundred thousand dollar camera setup useless
I'm sure some of the thousands of sattelites orbiting Earth could help with the data transmission. Please don't tell me it's not possible!
>>54187617
I think it would be almost impossible for them to pull something like this in our days.
There will be literally tens of thousands of civillian eyes analysing the ISS' path/compare it to the live feed and with the sunset times and the position of the stars as they appear on video, and people would soon realise things don't match up.
If i was nasa, i would avoid the the 24/7 live feed subject matter as much as possible.
>>54187413
He looks like someone jammed a bottle though his head
>it's an /x/ thread
Fuck you guys, I just wanted to see video of earth from space
This is a video where astronaut Don Pettit makes a strange presentation of the Cupola.
He sounds like a retard trying to explain SSD write cycles to some abbos
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KSzuiqVjJg4
>>54187914
I'm also trying for a few months now to find photos/videos of Earth from space that do not look like CGI.
I have failed to find any that don't scream fake
Why do you need a live feed of Earth op? You live on it right now. You can go out of your basement and watch it real time, you know.
>>54188130
One would think that after paying ~$19Billion every year for NASA, the americans would like to see some Live real footage of the Earth.
>>54186778
NASA"s #1 Job today is about Hiring Non whites and spamming Global warming
In almost 60 years of NASA, there is no footage of astronauts inside the Airlock _with the hatch open_
No first-person video of them leaving or returning to the Airlock.
>>54188499
True which is odd.
Also everyone in this thread check this out: https://www.urthecast.com/live
>>54187954
>strange
dude you have severe autism
there's nothing strange about that
he wanted to present the cupola and got asked a question about the shitty mechanism for the window shutters
>>54186778
no one honestly needs that
there are videos and pictures posted every fucking day
>>54188499
>>>/x/
>>54188284
>she will get tripple stuffed by Darnell, Tyrone, and Jontavious in your lifetime
Why even live bros?
>>54188530
Because even if she didn't you'd still be too beta to hit, m8.
>no one honestly needs 24/7 Live feed of Earth
>there are videos and pictures posted every fucking day
exactly. except it's something strange about them
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=utCthS3vDxc
>>54187667
Actually bandwidth to the ISS is a serious issue. A live stream just for the sake of having a livestream is a project for millions of dollars. Given how many of these PR stunts that NASA have pulled off, they would certainly have a live stream if it were financially viable. Clearly it isn't right now.
>>54187779
>There will be literally tens of thousands of civillian eyes analysing the ISS' path/compare it to the live feed and with the sunset times and the position of the stars as they appear on video, and people would soon realise things don't match up.
You can easily do the same with radio, there's a 24/7 ham radio in the ISS, you can easily track them with that
You're retarded
>>54188646
https://www.urthecast.com/live
Scroll down a little.
>>54188646
Bandwidth to anything in space is a serious issue, the DSN has been overwhelmed for years now
>>54187130
>the fact that the bandwidth from the ISS is extremely limited
You're making a funny joke, right?
The fucking MOON has 20mbit, the ISS orbits low enough that you can probably get a goddamn 4G signal.
>>54188238
This still makes no sense. Why? Why waste money on looking at stuff that you can see with your own eyes anyway while you could spend money on more useful or interesting things (such as actual experiments in space and sending robots on other celestial bodies). I mean, ask anyone on the street if they'd want this. They don't, they would just shrug because that idea is useless.
>>54188626
>except it's something strange about them
Ohh suuure.
>>>/x/
>>54188784
>>54188752
Sorry m8 that looks like CGI to me
The ISS is fucking real ok??!!!!!!!!!
Fuck you crazy flatearthers and conspiracist therists motherfuckers you are posting this crap all over the place!!!
>>54189219
Why are you so upset? A few people do not believe what NASA tells us, yet there are so much more people that still believe NASA. You are part of the majority. You should feel comfortable.
>>54187413
I don't think the earth is flat, but I'm 99% sure there is some sort of heavy covert operations going on with NASA, and that video looks fake as fuck, It looks like a high quality best of the line animation, but still uncanny.
this used to be on 24/7, now it streams only once in a while
http://www.ustream.tv/channel/iss-hdev-payload
>>54189347
Exactly my thoughts. Most nasa/esa/jaxa videos from space look like animation.
I mean, I KNOW they faked the moon landings since they was totally impossible to achieve, 6 times, with 1969-1972's technology
I would be surprised if this was the only time NASA have lied about something, and i wonder..what else could they have faked?
wtf has /g/ become
>>54189592
Well, the ISS is the most advanced piece of engineering ever created by mankind, so it totally belongs on /g/
>>54188626
just watched the video
what's strange about it?
>>54189720
certainly, but not the rest of the tripe in this thread
>>54186778
>>54186846
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/station/research/experiments/917.html
http://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/HDEV/
>>54189722
Man, i'm not some tinfoil flatearther, but when i watch NASA's videos of earth from space/iss, i have that odd feeling they are rendered with the same software.
If i wouldn't know they are from NASA, i would totally be sure they are cgi.
But they have to be real, i don't see any reason at all why they would fake footage of earth.
>>54189538
AS11-44-6642 (21 July 1969) --- The Apollo 11 Lunar Module ascent stage, with astronauts Neil A. Armstrong and Edwin E. Aldrin Jr. aboard, is photographed from the Command and Service Modules (CSM) during rendezvous in lunar orbit.
>>54190075
Something does not belong in that pic
>>54190089
>HOW DOES JPEG COMPRESSION WORK
kill yourself.
>>54190089
Note that the artifacts are everywhere consistently, there isn't one part of the image that has other artifacts (different resolution of the jpeg "square", different rotation, etc).
>>54190089
This will happen with literally any JPG photo.
Here is a picture of a blue dot on a black background, saved as a JPG, opened in photoshop. After the levels are changed, you can see the "blocks" used in JPG compression.
t. autist
>>54190089
>>54186778
Implying anything they have done is real.
>>54188030
What are a few giveaways of fake videos, may i ask?
>>54190338
his massive autism
http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/nmc/spacecraftDisplay.do?id=1969-059C
They landed on the moon in THIS? Look at those bent thin metal plates.
If you were to build a small doghouse, would you allow those gaps between the metal sheets on the roof?
This is ridiculous! The 'Lander' is covered in kevlar and gold fucking foil.
Not to mention the complete absence of a blast crater underneath the module and no dust on the landing pads.
How can you believe this shit?
>>54188499
There is indeed, which shows just how ignorant to the facts you really are. there are multi hour archives of headcam spacewalks that show the astronaut preparing to exit, and exiting the airlock.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=abKr-xHBLvM
footage begins at 37 min
>>54186778
>NASA has NEVER supplied those who have given over a trillion dollars in tax funding, a view of their home
They sent loads of 70mm cameras on the Apollo missions, that's significantly higher res than 4K.
>>54190381
He's an astronaut. Do you think he's going to be some sort of normie fag?
>>54190450
autist != astronaut
>>54190385
>If you were to build a small doghouse
If I were to build a small doghouse it would be on Earth with 1G of gravity and an atmosphere. Structural integrity is almost meaningless in space.
>complete absence of a blast crater underneath the module and no dust on the landing pads
How fast do you think it landed? Protip: not very.
>>54190385
Indeed no dust on the pads.
And no blast crater, or at least some fucking burn trace on the ground from that fucking engine.
Yet the astronauts' footprints are clearly visible in the moondust.
Americans please explain how this is possible
>>54190496
There is clearly dust on that landing pad.
here you go
http://www.ustream.tv/channel/live-iss-stream
>>54190538
I concurr
>>54190494
>Structural integrity is almost meaningless in space.
I really hope you are not an astro-engineer designing stuff for space use.
>How fast do you think it landed? Protip: not very.
Regardless of the descent/landing speed, the engine's thrust would have burned and/or moved at least some amount of dust.
Yet no trace is visible.
>>54190629
>flash plugin
>ishyggydiggy 2017
>>54190089
>That one website that claimed it could detect photoshops
>People on various sites such as 4chan believed it
>People on forums were permabanned because people believed the results
>Now we're using it for NASA photos
>>54187779
Do you really think getting into orbit is that hard dude?
>>54190762
It's true. Long term satelites and spacecraft that are not intended for reuse or reentry do not need much consideration in terms of structural integrity. The launch vehicle however is much more dependent on not being torn to shreds by the multi km/s fast air rushing it in addition to high g forces.
>>54188742
Is is way too retarded to track It with ham radio
>>54190845
yeah, wtf. it isn't something to just scoff at, but getting into orbit isn't as fantastical as some of this hoaxer tarde seems to believe. it all comes down to "simple" engineering in the end. you only need just over 7.5 km/s for an orbital radius of 6500 km.
>>54189219
The only way to be a flat earthier is to have a really small world. These people have brought no meaning into their lives
>>54189347
>99%sure
Yeah no one cares, wacko
![iss_2981[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/QXkTXtB.jpg "iss_2981[1].jpg")
>>54190892
why not just photograph it? this french due has ben doing it for years
>>54190089
>hurrr the first potogrufy in spayse look different from all potogrufy beefor
>>54190855
>Long term satelites and spacecraft that are not intended for reuse or reentry do not need much consideration in terms of structural integrity
Please stop, you are making a fool of yourself
By your logic, until today NASA put fragile, structurally mediocre sattelites and lunar modules on top of very strong and well engineered launch vehicles.
Way to go american! You make your country proud.
>>54190947
You can literally see the ISS crossing the sky every now and then, it's bright and fast as fuck.
>>54190947
hell, every few days get to see the iss roaring the night skies. You can get emails warning you of the next pass.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-khxhnVp6OE
>>54190908
you are asking too much from them they can into basic fucking physics
>>54190976
most launch vehicles don't reach massive G numbers, only those that use solid booster, even then the most dangerous thing for your cargo is the massive noise waves and the aerodynamic forces. That's why they use 2+ million fairings.
The earth is round it casts a round shadow on the moon, but yes we should have 24/7 iss footage.
>>54191063
flat earthers think earth is a disk so the round shadow it fits on their fantasies.
>>54190496
do you niggers even zoom?
>>54190538
>>54190635
quite right
>>54190988
This. I managed to saw the thing zooming by the sky last year. The kids were losing their minds over what appeared to be a star moving that fast.
>>54190762
>Yet no trace is visible.
I don't think you understand just how thin the layer of dust on the surface of the moon is. However, you can still clearly see a difference in the surface under the lander and the surrounding area. Note that thrust from an engine is obviously going to spread dust in a much different fashion than simply standing on it, which will displace it around the foot to form a prominent footprint.
>>54191100
yeah flatearthers are the worst of all conspirators. Do I believe the Earth is round yes, I can't say I know the Earth is round because I haven't seen it from space. Still all of the other planets and satellites in our solar system are observable and round so why would the Earth be any different?
They're just unable to think and reason. They're against the NWO and all this shit but they're just as bad, if not worse. The underlying problem is humans not being able to think and observe for themselves. Whether they are brainwashed from the TV or believe every YouTube video they watch about reptilian humanoids controlling the planet.
![c074b[1].gif](https://i.imgur.com/9s4E9bL.gif "c074b[1].gif")
>>54190385
you think that's finicky? originally they wanted to land with a non-pressurized open lander but some of the more conservative mission planners where horrified because the idea of landing on another world "naked" and without a proper "ship" was too bizarre for them. But still is more than possible since the moon is a fucking vacuum. they even had plans for a 1 man lander without barely any fucking instrument if the saturn V development was a failure.
>>54191283
http://www.astronautix.com/craft/lmllight.htm
just look at this, and it would have worked without any problem. They just went with the eagle more conservative design because the saturn v was a fucking beast
>>54188556
REKT
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=njCDZWTI-xg
>>54187332
THIS
>>54191224
you can go oven the horizon and not fall off, or look over the edge though. that's how you fucking know.
flat eathers have never flown or travelled beyond 15 miles of their origin.
there would be no horizon on a flat earth, only endless ground before you, until you got to the edge, in which case you'd be able to stand at the edge like a sidewalk, or a canyon
>>54190385
You're a fucking retard. It was made from the best materials and electronics at that time.
There is no fucking crater or dust spread around since there's no atmosphere on the moon. The engine doesn't affect the dust!
>>54191370
i now a flatearther that now lives in australia and he's from usa kek
>>54191332
>negro feminist beta naked on controller
y u do dis?
btw fun fact about the moon, regolith apparently smells fucking awful
Father of nasa Wernhern Von Braun's tombstone.
>>54191515
Psalms 19:1: "The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament sheweth his handywork"
Someone either trolled von Braun post-mortem, or was it his choice to have this on his tombstone?
>>54191577
>>54191577
>All scientists are MRA atheists
You know Newton and Maxwell were both religious, right?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KZLl3XwlAIE
Atronauts playing golf on the moon, because who gives a fuck about accidentally tearing or puncturing your suit in case of falling.
>>54191616
There are 2 requirements to be an Atheist.
1. Profess there is no God
2. To hate him.
>>54192161
As the days go by the second requirement becomes more and more enforced too.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T8-YdgU-CF4&list=PLltxIX4B8_URNUzDE2sXctnUAEXgEDDGn
Flat Earth Clues
There are no tracks before or behind the wheels, while footprints can be seen all around and under the rover.
This proves once again that we are looking at a staged photo and the rover was simply lowered into place.
>>54192381
How is this possible?
>>54186846
>he doesn't know web design
>normies will write him off as a nutcase
This is why 4Chan shouldn't start these sorts of campaigns.
>>54192416
Yet in this photo the tracks are clearly visible
>>54192381
Don't you think it would have been easier to drive the rover around a Hollywood set instead of lowering it into place? How do you explain the photo of the moon with the earth far off in the background? Was that a Hollywood trick too?
>>54192468
if that rover is on the moon, where are the tracks? how did it end up in that position?
“You can’t have a baby in one month by getting nine women pregnant”
― Wernher von Braun
>>54192503
The wheels fold out. It was light enough for one man to lift and set into place.
>>54192381
>This proves once again that we are looking at a staged photo
Do us all a favor and fucking kill yourself you waste of sperm.
>>54191577
Kill yourself
>>54192602
Actually Neil Armstrong unfolded and lift the rover single-handed, while snapping some random studio-grade pictures of the surroundings
>>54192697
It was the equivalent of 76.8 pounds on the moon.
>>54192381
So it's all fake? All SIX missions? We never got caught? It's real, it's just hoaxers showing their ignorance and lack of education. It's in the history books, is that a lie too? Most hoaxers refuse facts and evidences, but believe nonsense videos on YouTube filled with lies and misinformation. The Russians new it was real, plus the missions were tracked. Just because hoaxers think something was fake, doesn't mean it is. There are loads of lies on the internet about the landings. They are a fact of history, not opinion. People need to get over it and admit they are wrong.
>>54192826
Disinfo shill. Ignore.
>Do I believe the world is flat?
>I do.
Stopped watching.
Get your shit together OP.
>>54193426
kek
>>54186778
Kill yourself to be honest familia.
>>54193426
Lost.
>>54190496
Negro, please!
We gave NASA silly amounts of money to go to the moon, if they indeed faked it i promise you that it wouldn't be able to be spotted by curry fucks like yourself
>>54186778
good troll.
Get off /g/ pls
>>54191515
The father of the V-2 rocket as well.
>>54193426
If you look close enough you can see my sides, launching from orbit
>>54191105
yep, it's moon dust
So WIndows 10 spying on your ass isn't enough?
>>54193855
Nobody, not even nasa, could have predicted the technological advancement that we live now.
They never imagined that almost 50 years later people will have personal computers, and that their fake space and moon footage will be availble for anybody to see and analyse.
Nasa have painted itself into a corner, and sooner or later everybody will realise that they have deceived us.
Also be on the lookout for a possible meteorite/space junk fake destruction of the ISS in the next few years.
When it happens, remember you read it on /g/ first
>>54192280
Makes you think.
>>54186778
http://www.ustream.tv/channel/live-iss-stream
>>54194612
>Flash player
not even once
>>54186778
you need a continuous source of energy... or, do you think they have AC like you do in your home?
I doubt they have abundant energy out there. just recently, solar panels and batteries have become better, and the ISS is rather old.
>>54189720
>the ISS is the most advanced piece of engineering ever created by mankind
no
>>54187413
it's processed as fuck for contrast
and it looks like they may have ran motion interpolation on the footage, some parts seem to lag behind
really, most nasa imagery is super-processed
>>54189538
with technology of that day, the SR-71 was built, a plane that's ridiculously advanced even by modern standards, pretty sure NASA at least had a chance of going to the moon
the earth is flat goy!
When Nasa build something they want to send out of earth, they make sure said something is going to last, which means they could live with using something that is considered as obsolete in the consumer market.
Take Curiosity rover for example. For all its advanced instruments that it carries along (soil sampling/analysis, navigation, communication, 1080p camera, spectrometer, and who knows what else inside that motherfucker), it is only powered with something equivalent to Pentium II.
>>54196067
Dude in the embedded IC world, RAD750 is the top of the line processor.
I worked in a fab that produced embedded IC and I can tell you this; the processor that's used in your average Garmin flight instrument unit is literally one-fifth the processing power of RAD750 and has none of the radioactive shielding bar the black packaging itself
>>54192416
You retard this is not taken on the moon. It has to be on earth on a training session, just after they lowered the rover on the ground, since theres no tire tracks
>>54196390
>radioactive shielding
that seems counter-productive
>>54195368
Friend. I salute you but we are outnumbered and even if we send these retards to space, they will say it's just hypnosis or IMAX. Leave it be. All is lost.
>>54194653
>no
Out of genuine curiosity please name some more advanced engineering
>>54191515
>>54191577
von braun was a lutheran when he lived in germany, but after coming to america he became intensely religious, becoming an evangelist.
>>54186778
>NASA has NEVER supplied those who have given over a trillion dollars in tax funding, a view of their home.
uwot?
http://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/HDEV/
There are downtimes when the ISS is over areas of the Earth at night and when it switches receivers.
Oh, there is sound also, so be warned if some russian starts yelling.
>>54194653
Rly? solar pannels JUST got better? what are they using out there then? also, nuclear power? and, what is in your opinion more advanced engineering?
>>54189247
So you use satellites daily, but cannot believe that ISS exists?
It literally just a big satellite.
>>54200262
>http://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/HDEV/
This shit really looks like animation.
>>54186778
>Streaming 2x 4K from space
>FROM SPACE
The cameras aren't the issue, the bandwidth is.
>>54201753
That's nice?
While they do have plenty of high end cameras there already, bandwidth may be an issue.
Not to mention the severe psychological effects from being on camera 24/7
>>54187667
Lol lets turn tdrs into a wan. Thats totally a good idea. Especially a government regulated one.
They should set up a live feed of the moon already
>>54192103
>implying you wouldn't fuck around and have fun like that
>>54192576
So this is assuming you are a man?
In that case no you cannot have a baby.
Continuing down the rabbit hole, if by having a baby is having it pushed out of the womb, you can have it in minutes, not month. And if by having 9 women pregnant, you can have more than 9 babies in minutes, assuming they were conceived at a particular time that by some freak sheer luck they all pushed them out at the same time and none dies.
Phrasing and also relativity son.
>>54192381
Holy shit, look at the flat horizon reflected on the visor. Moon confirmed to also be flat. Dark side of the moon my ass, dark side of the cookie planet.
>>54192103
these were suits designed to survive falling over in, staying uprright while moving is hard enough to the untrained, and they were setting up experiments and collecting samples and stuff where they were almost certain to fall over.
>>54202560
Where are the tire tracks?
>>54196616
>this is what our tax is funding
instead of driving cars on the moon we should be colonising mars
>>54205176
NASA doesn't do moon missions anymore
>>54205229
so why has this image only just popped up then?
>>54205352
because it's clearly fake
>>54193947
le ebin windows spoying on your ass momo
>>54205426
i dont think so
>>54197856
Maybe for consumer market, but when you're sending shit to a place with little or no atmosphere, you'll need that extra protection.
>>54206542
i mean you wrote "radioactive shielding", rather than "radiation shielding"
what you wrote suggests that the shielding itself was radioactive
>>54206594
you know, not being able to understand whats implied (verbally or written) is a sign of autism
