[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
Vintage computers
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /g/ - Technology

Thread replies: 24
Thread images: 7
File: IMG_20160719_005243.jpg (2 MB, 4096x2304) Image search: [Google]
IMG_20160719_005243.jpg
2 MB, 4096x2304
Okay so I dont know if any of you will remember me but I was the guy having doubts about picking this 286 AST computer a while back in the retro computer thread and now have some time and here it is and is a beast of a machine, just the size of it makes me thinks it was meant for industrial use

Vintage computer thread !
>>
>>55639979
Pretty badass
Gonna put it up your butt?
>>
>>55639979
Nice
post guts
>>
File: IMG_20160719_005320.jpg (1 MB, 4096x2304) Image search: [Google]
IMG_20160719_005320.jpg
1 MB, 4096x2304
>>55640295
>>55640312

the size of it scares me
>>
File: IMG_20160719_011216.jpg (2 MB, 4096x2304) Image search: [Google]
IMG_20160719_011216.jpg
2 MB, 4096x2304
>>55640312
>>
>>55639979
>just the size of it makes me thinks it was meant for industrial use
Fairly sure that was pretty much the standard size back then. I had a desktop 8086-based computer from Mitac that was about the same size.
>>
>>55639979
Is the keyswtich also the only powerswitch?
>>
>>55640463
noice
what's the manufacturer of the hard drive? the front panel design looks enterprise(TM)
>>
File: IMG_20160719_013043.jpg (2 MB, 4096x2304) Image search: [Google]
IMG_20160719_013043.jpg
2 MB, 4096x2304
>>55640534

there is a main power switch back on the power supply, but yes turning it on is with the keys
>>
>>55640544

its a Fujitsu limited edition from 1986 40mb and is operational
>>
File: IMG_20160719_014936.jpg (2 MB, 4096x2304) Image search: [Google]
IMG_20160719_014936.jpg
2 MB, 4096x2304
>>55640632

forgot picture
>>
File: IMG_20160719_012923.jpg (3 MB, 4096x2304) Image search: [Google]
IMG_20160719_012923.jpg
3 MB, 4096x2304
and this is its RAM
>>
>>55640652
>tfw I knew it deep down
I wonder how the '80s 5.25'' models compare to the shit they made in the '90s, their 3.5'' stuff was slower than shit

pretty cool box though, keep that shit safe and going, don't forget to go over to winworld and see if there's anything cool to run on it too

what was it again, like a 286-16?
>>
>>55640738

i dont know all I know is that is a 286 anything in more detail dont know

well I mostly picked it up cause I was interested in the CGA/EGA 14" monitor that camed with it cause these are RARE as fuck at-least here In Europe
>>
>>55640691
The two right-most connectors are the ordinary ISA connectors, right? Any clue what the left-most connector is?
>>
>>55640691
Shit, were RAM controllers still rocking inductive delay lines in 1988? With those huge QFP packages on the motherboard and all, I'd have thought they had moved beyond that since long. Was this some kind of budget build?
>>
>>55641031

dont know it plugs in the motherboard so maybe a advanced ISA slot, IBM model 80 has them to
>>
>>55641031

Its vesa local bus.
>>
>>55640691
For anyone who's interested, here's the datasheet for those memory chips:
http://pdf1.alldatasheet.com/datasheet-pdf/view/125574/HYNIX/HY53C256LS/+02W587V.VMpZcKczvIzEGU++/datasheet.pdf

tRC is 175 ns, tRCD is ~50 ns. It's pretty amazing how RAM latency hasn't even improved by an order of magnitude in 30 years.
>>
>>55641582
It is most certainly not. The VLB connector pad pitch was much higher.
>>
>>55641603
And by higher I mean lower, of course.
>>
File: b-386dx25-dtk.jpg (118 KB, 587x675) Image search: [Google]
b-386dx25-dtk.jpg
118 KB, 587x675
>>55641031
Lots of boards had those extra connectors for RAM expansion cards, always wondered what they actually looked like though.

>>55641102
>Was this some kind of budget build?
It was probably a pretty decently mid-range system especially with that huge hard drive. 286en weren't budget-tier until around 1990.

With early PCs the easiest way to tell whether or not you're looking at budget shit other than going off of the date codes themselves is the level of integration and size of the board, the very last 286 boards had 1-chip chipsets, maybe a ROM and two to four smaller DIP chips. Opposite goes for high-end shit like pic related where pretty much everything is implemented in discrete 74xx series logic or custom ASICs
>>
>>55640815
take a picture of the CPU desu, probably the little Intel i-logo'd socketed chip below all of the labeled BIOS ROMs
>>
>>55640691
sanic ram
Thread replies: 24
Thread images: 7

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.