any amd cards out there that are better then a GTX 980?

Thread replies: 6
Thread images: 3

Anonymous
2016-07-18 01:14:26 Post No. 55625189
[Report] Image search: [Google]

File: windows-10-02-e1463708152215.png (302 KB, 580x325) Image search: [Google]

302 KB, 580x325

Anonymous 2016-07-18 01:14:26 Post No. 55625189 [Report]

any amd cards out there that are better then a GTX 980?

>>

Anonymous 2016-07-18 01:18:10 Post No.55625232
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-07-18 01:18:10 Post No.55625232 [Report]

R9 290x
R9 390 / 390x
Fury
Fury X
Rx480

>>

Anonymous 2016-07-18 01:30:04 Post No.55625391
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-07-18 01:30:04 Post No.55625391 [Report]

>>55625232
You mean fury, fury x and 390x? Maybe the 480 when other coolers come.

>>

Anonymous 2016-07-18 01:35:46 Post No.55625447
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-07-18 01:35:46 Post No.55625447 [Report]

>>55625232
>390
>RX480
>Better than 980

I'm an AMD shill but even I see that's nonsense. The RX480 may equal the 980 at best when overclocked with 3rd party boards/coolers.

>>

Anonymous 2016-07-18 01:59:11 Post No.55625704
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2016-07-18 01:59:11 Post No.55625704 [Report]

File: 459849853.jpg (55 KB, 700x700) Image search: [Google]

55 KB, 700x700

>>55625391
>fury x
Pfft, that's a babby-tier card, won't even beat the GTX 1080. Unlike, of course:

The AMD FirePro S9300X2:

>8GB of HBM (Fury-X only has 4)
>13.9 TFLOPS (Fury-X only has 8.6)
>Passively cooled

>>

Anonymous 2016-07-18 02:05:23 Post No.55625779
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2016-07-18 02:05:23 Post No.55625779 [Report]

File: 1467523200250.gif (2 MB, 401x302) Image search: [Google]

2 MB, 401x302

>>55625704
why passively cooled what the fuck. raja stop smoking rocks please, this isnt a smartphone