Can someone explain these graphs to me please?
>>55605593
Yes. It's like dicks. Longer is better.
Very simple, are you people retarded?
>>55605635
kek
>>55605593
Relative performance of X is better than Y.
>>55605593
Approximately 2x the performance and over 3x the performance in VR.
Are you retarded?
>>55606652
By how much? fps?
>>55605593
It means Nvidia 900 series gimping drivers will be available soon.
>>55605593
Literally could have read these graphs in 3rd grade.
>>55605593
It's not that hard, it is relative performance.
>>55606757
This is fucking retarded, frozen is clearly a 6.12.
>>55606781
So if i play tomb rider and i get 50fps on the 960, i will get 100fps on the 1060?
>>55606799
After Nvidia artificially gimped the 960 in their drivers, yes.
It's whatever you want it to mean.
Some want it to mean that one GPU is massively better, other want it to mean nvidia are full of shit.
>>55606817
That is the best graph yet LMAO...
I've been stuck in the 960 2GiB meme for a while now. I want out and onto the 1060
>>55605593
Jesus fucking christ. I'd never buy AMD but come on nvidia you must know we're smarter than that...
can never forget this gem
>>55606799
Virtually yes, in the same scene same settings etcetera.
Relative performance charts are better than number charts, mostly because you can't compare number charts unless the game has a built in benchmark that is 100% similar every run.
So far everything Nvidia has said about Pascal has been true, even that huge almost 3X VR bar.
Everything Microsoft says is also true
They even have bars!
>>55606965
kek, linux won't even recognize my 8 years old Wifi card and you think Microsoft are lying?
everyone knows Linux is shit when it comes to compatibility m8.
>>55605593
>>55606965
How do you expect them naming every printer they support on a piece of marketing?
>>55605593
Marketing bullshit?
