![timespy-3[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/5NiGoD8.png "timespy-3[1].png")
If the GTX 1060 loses to the 480 in DX12 and Vulkan, isn't the 1060 just a shitty meme?
>>55577327
not only that, but it will not be sli'able aswell
>>55577327
no gtx 1060 will oc to 2000mhz without any issue while rx 480 will struggle with ocing more than 1400mhz.
>>55577327
-60 series nvidia cards have *always* been gimped, or performed sub-par. Maybe this time will be different, but there is a plethora of evidence to suggest the gimp has begun already.
>>55578603
>>55578603
That's not how technology works. Go back to high school
>>55578603
2304 cores of RX 480 vs 1280 cores of GTX 1060. 1060 needs all the clocks it can get to match the RX 480. As if you never learned from the days of the pentium 4
>>55578603
This. Just like the FX 9590 is the best CPU on the market because it ships at 5GHz.
>>55578603
>higher clock speeds
>small as fuck memory bus
>literally choking as the card screams for more memory bandwidth
Yeah sorry lad, but running those high clocks and having no bandwidth is like trying push Cat 6 speed down Cat 5 cables nigger.
>>55578603
jesus christ
of course it is
nvidias low end is only for their poorfag fanboys, they really only care about high end
>>55579989
Yes, jesus christ. This is what lurks around on /g/, and some times people com here for advice and they get answers from retards like this -> >>55578603
>No DX11 version of Time Spy to compare against
Hmm. If only we could see what the gap is compared to DX11 in the same benchmark.
>>55580360
>DX11
>5 year-old API
>Ha! AMD Might have the edge in DX12, but it can barely handle Descent 2 on maximum without going below 1500 FPS like my awesome Nvidia card!
>>55577352
>sli budget cards
shiggy diggy doo
