AMDFAGS ON SUICIDE WATCH
>>55535967
fresh meme
Reminder that the MSRP for the 1060 GTX 6GB version is only 10€ above the RX 480 8GB.
>>55535967
Post the rest OP.
>>55535967
Source?
ayo
*fires up ashes of singularity*
you wanna
*checks pcie slots for fire*
delete this
*look over list of dx12 games again*
>>55535997
http://videocardz.com/62122/nvidia-geforce-gtx-1060-official-performance-leaked
![original[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/6iLQOAy.jpg "original[1].jpg")
>>55535967
holy shit rx 480 really blew nvidia the fuck out this is how desperate they are
>>55535993
>>55535967
are these averages or minimums? because in either case they're vastly off for the 480, to the point that i'd say the bencher was skewing the results for all the cards.
It's a really cute fake, but they could've at least tried.
>>55536026
Check the 2xSSAA, dumbass.
>>55536004
>Numbers from Nvidia
>Reliable
Pick one.
>>55536032
yeah because that would double 960 performance right?
fuck off retard.
>>55535967
Hah bullshit, go watch youtube reviews of the 480 and you'll see it's well over 60 fps in GTA V
>>55536038
That's obviously the 4GB version of the 960.
>>55536051
Not if you're running these exact settings.
>>55536070
>this piss poor damage control
i assume you get paid on a post count basis and not how much effort you actually put in to shilling?
>>55535967
What's the 1060 gimp price point?
>>55536026
Techpowerup is a shill company. I can't take any review that doesn't include details and settings seriously.
>>55536087
>taking currynigger 'leak's more seriously than an nvidia shill site
>>55535967
Ay nigga, is this with the updated firmware? Apparently the rx480 has improved performance with the new update. I'm waiting for that Sapphire Nitro aftermarket.
>>55536070
You can see it's hovering around 60 even on 1440p
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gp7Ko7LYUaE
>>55536077
Nice ad-hominem, faggot. Here is a benchmark of RotTR with the 4GB version. It checks out.
http://www.pcgameshardware.de/Rise-of-the-Tomb-Raider-Spiel-54451/Specials/Grafikkarten-Benchmarks-1184288/
>>55536108
i thought vram didnt matter
i rate 3.5/4
>>55536101
It's probably with month-old drivers at settings that are unrealistic.
Literally no sites have even reported the 480 performing this badly, either the benches were rigged or this is just somebody having a giggle at videocardz' expense.
>>55536106
>MSAA
>off
These new benchmarks were tested with 4xAA.
>>55536101
>Apparently the rx480 has improved performance with the new update
By roughly 0.5%.
>>55536148
eta till nvidia drivers improve performance instead of just gimping old cards
>>55536123
So you're telling me 4xAA eats 30 fps on 1440p for the 480?
>>55536108
Its not a 2xSSAA. Check out 970 fps, same as in techpowerup review. Only thing that still checks out is you being a retarded shill, mate.
>>55535967
>>55535993
I would need to underclock my 480 on the old drivers in order to match these results.
Can't wait to see 1.4ghz aftermarket 480s that cost $269us matching/beating the $299 1060.
>>55536148
If by '0.5%' you mean 'an average of 3.6%', sure thing.
Next month it'll be another 2-3%, the month after that it'll be another 1.5-2% and by the end of the year an overclocked 480 will be in striking distance of the 1070.
>>55536119
The hype won't die anyway, two days ago the 1060 was btfo apparently and now these in house benches from a 54.4fps ---------------------54.5 company
>>55536148
Sauce?
Holy shit the 480 is getting destroyed in both DX11 and DX12
RIP 480
>>55536190
AMD only gimps their cards, the 480 will only get worse over time
>>55535967
These things put 1060 roughly 15% ahead of RX 480 at 1080p. Considering 980 is about 10% ahead of 480, and nvidia claimed that 1060 has 980-level performance, these numbers seem fairly realistic. With more AMD sponsored games on the list (Hitman, Total War: Warhammer, etc) the numbers would be a bit closer, so I imagine other sites will show a bit less of a lead for 1060, but a lead regardless.
>>55536196
The numbers in the pic average out to 0.5%. Obviously, if you increase the amount of games benchmarked, you'd reach a lower average, and a bit higher if you only look at tomb raider / ashes.
>>55536212
>>55536220
you nvidiots aren't even trying in your own shill thread
how BTFO can you possibly get already? 1060 is DOA flop
>>55536190
> by the end of the year an overclocked 480 will be in striking distance of the 1070.
>Being this deluded.
I'm rooting for AMD but you're a special kind of retarded.
>>55536232
>the truth is shilling
That's interesting.
Not sure how you can explain away how the 1060 is way faster than a 480, the benchmarks are very clear at this point.
>>55536162
It should, modern engines struggle super hard with MSAA at high resolutions.
>>55536162
MSAA can be extremely demanding.
>>55536265
Ok, how would you explain 960 getting same FPS in Tomb Rider with and without 2xSSAA according to the "benchmark"?
http://www.pcgameshardware.de/Rise-of-the-Tomb-Raider-Spiel-54451/Specials/Grafikkarten-Benchmarks-1184288/
what u guys are forgetting is that 2x480s >>> 1080
>>55536251
Says the retard who clearly never followed the history of the 7970.
>>55536303
I'd rather not hace crossfire microstutter bullshit. Dual cards, never again
>>55536302
Different locations in the game are more demanding than others.
Other graphical settings may differ between the benchmarks.
You generally don't want to do cross-site comparisons for absolute numbers.
>>55536302
I really hope you aren't trying to compare two different benchmarks to each other. You realize they're using different hardware and a different setup.
>1060 better than 480 in directx12
Should be obvious that this is horseshit.
>>55536162
this was a problem stated from the lack of rops
i dont actually know shit im just repeating what some other anon said
>>55536365
Yes and no
Crossfire is dumb, but DX12 isn't crossfire.
There's no multicard stutter in DX12 (or theoretically vulkan) because it uses SFR instead of AFR. Both cards render the same frame rather than alternating, which is what causes the microstutter.
How nvidia deals with the microstutter is by adding lag to frames to make it smoother.
>>55536427
would rendering the same frame give some sort of tearing, or is it in small squares?
>>55536401
>1060 better than 480 in directx12
It's actually pretty hilarious if true.
Nvidia beating AMD at their own game, the 480 has literally nothing on the 1060 anymore.
AMDFAGS BURNING THEMSELVES ALIVE
>>55536000
Checked n kek'd
the 480 is around 30% faster than the 960GTX in this benchmark.
all the other benchmarks show that it's at least 50% faster.
so according to this benchmark the 480 has a 20% lead over their own successor the 380 which is by the way faster than the 960GTX.
kek.
>>55536401
Contrary to your beliefs, nvidia cards do fine in select DX12 games. Obviously they wouldn't pick AMD sponsored games that run like shit on their hardware (Hitman, Total War: Warhammer) for their benchmarks, and instead opt for titles like Forza and Tomb Raider. At least Ashes is there, which isn't so AMD dominated anymore after nvidia's fixes, despite Oxide doing the same shit they did in Star Swarm.
>>55536427
It's called crossfire regardless of the rendering method, that does not change. And DX12 doesn't force SFR. AFR will still work with DX12, and will still be easier to implement than SFR. While titles using SFR will be more common than now, AFR will most likely still be the most common option, because devs can't be bothered to cater to a minuscule amount of people.
>>55536442
That shouldn't happen. SFR isn't really magic though, and will have much lower scaling than AFR. That 80-100% scaling you see with AFR in some titles (in average fps, not in actual performance)? Not going to happen with SFR.
Pic related. Mantle means SFR, DX11 means AFR.
>videocardz
Sure is damage control at nvidia hq
>>55536498
Your math is a bit off.
480 is about 50% faster than 960 according to those benchmarks.
>>55536037
I give this post a 3.5 out of 4
>>55536442
Well it pools resources. I don't know the specifics but it can't give tearing because they're both rendering the exact same frame.
Tearing is what happens when two different frames are being displayed at the same time- while the monitor is refreshing the screen (one line of pixels at a time), a new frame is delivered from the GPU and it switches to the next frame midway through the refresh, giving a horizontal tear. If you're at like 20fps and 60Hz, the monitor displays the same frame in a row 3 times and then bam during the 4th refresh a new frame is delivered. Freesync (and gsync through some roundabout way) only refresh the screen when a new frame is delivered. (which requires some communication between monitor and GPU, hence displayport or nvidia's module)
Tearing is just not an issue related to SFR or AFR.
The rendering resources are simply shared between the cards. Rendering is already highly parallel so the work just gets split even more
seriously this shit comes from the site that created the graph of 1060 being x1.4 and nvidia themself debunked it
i will say it one more time
whoever posts wccftech or videocardz is just a fucking retard
>>55536572
>and nvidia themself debunked it
Source?
So the leaks are officially from Nvidia? If you take their 1060 numbers against reviewed rx480 this is what you get.
Division - 480: 58.7 | 1060: 53.1
TR (before patch) - 480: 70.4 | 1060: 51.3
Crysis 3 - 480: 58.7 | 1060: 43.6
Ashes - 480: 45.2 | 1060: 36.0
Witcher 3 - 480: 50.0 | 1060: 53.0
GTA 5 - 480: 58.7 | 1060: 60.1
http://www.anandtech.com/show/10446/the-amd-radeon-rx-480-preview
>>55536632
I have no words to describe how retarded you are.
>>55536632
based nVidia
we won again
ayymd btfo
AMDrones on suicide watch.
>>55536359
7970 was AMD's flagship. But now you're saying that their midrange 480 can compete with nvidias high end 1070. Either you're that deluded or just a shill.
Marginally better now (in Goyworks titles), considerably worse 2 years from now.
>>55536507
So Nvidia is worse in games that use DX12 properly?
>>55536677
Yes, games like Hitman, that look worse with DX12 than with DX11, use DX12 properly.
>>55536685
Sure buddy.
>>55536602
nvidia own 1060 page.. look it up
>>55536692
http://www.pcgameshardware.de/Hitman-Spiel-6333/Specials/Episode-2-Test-Benchmarks-DirectX-12-1193618/
google translate
>Hitman in DX12 almost always looks worse than under DX11. This is primarily the timid streaming of DX12 which, unlike DX11, doesn't always apply maximum texture resolution. We suspect that this DX12 memory management creates many headaches for developers and that the current setting is a compromise to stifle a buffer overflow, and to nip potential performance drops in the bud.
>>55536695
Not seeing anything debunking it.
>>55536230
That's not what I'm seeing. Im cross viewing some reviews for these exact games and benchmarks, and on most of them the gap between the 480 and the 980 is slightly larger. Something around 15 to 20% on average, depending on what's tested.
The 960 gap does check out though.
>>55536706
Examples: DX11
Nvidiafags BTFO
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GfrAD3tRqGw&feature=youtu.be&t=24m34s
>>55536722
DX12
>>55536710
I used TPU for my 10% figure.
>>55536727
>Sapphire Nation
Sure is unbiased opinion here.
>>55536729
>>55536722
No way this is real
>>55536795
Sapphire/Zotac makes nvidia cards also.
What's so exciting about drooling over benchmarks for hardware you'll never buy / use to its fullest extent (for the majority of the people here)?
What's so great about company honor? Do you the people making the products you use don't give a single shit about you specifically? They only care about your money.
I've never understood the GPU craze on /g/, someone please explain.
>>55536837
shit gets real when you have 10k invested in nvidia
>>55536837
we want to feel like we made the better choice when we buy a card
now ged oud
shill
>>55536928
>better choice
>nvidia card
>dx12
pick one
>>55536810
It's a pretty fucked up game.
And unlike the episode 1 of the game, the episode 2 actually gives nvidia cards a bigger boost than AMD cards with DX12.
All AMD sponsored games go into the same pile as goyworks games anyway.
>>55536000
Ayyyyy
![hqdefault[2].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/Uii6gXZ.jpg "hqdefault[2].jpg")
>>55536000
NVIDIOTS GET OUTTTTTTTTT REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
>>55536837
Mostly it's just to show people how buying AMD is always the wrong choice. Nvidia always makes better products.
>>55536837
Just people laughing at the idiot AMD shills shitting up the place lately
>>55535967
DELETE PLS
If those benchmarks are real 480RX non-ref cards are DOA.
Here is the full source.
http://videocardz.com/62138/nvidia-geforce-gtx-1060-reviewers-guide-leaked
>>55535967
Damn nvidia have a winner with this one. I guess they believed all the rumors about the 480 being 980/390x performance hence why they targeted 980 performance with the 1060 to match the 480x (based on early 480x speculation). That tweet from that Nvidia marketing guy about how people will laugh at the 480x once reviews came out probably confirms this.
No one expected the 480x to be so bad.
DELET
>>55535967
I bet all my shekels that the 1060 was overclocked to hell like the 2,1ghz on 69°C meme 1080 nobody ever reached again in tests
>>55537345
>damage control
>>55537369
its a videocardz article pretty sure it was made up by him lol
>>55537379
>damage control
>>55537369
>>55537415
nvidia pr shill top kek
>>55537443
>damage control
Doesnt matter the 480 has opensource drivers so they already won by design
Everyone actually buying a proprietary gpu in 2016 should consider killing themselves
>>55537453
>>55537415
>>55537369
Damage Control to Lisa Su
Damage Control to Lisa Su
Take your rx480 and fry your motherboard
Damage Control to Lisa Su
Commencing countdown, Zen is on it's way (one *delay*, two *delay*, three *delay*)
Check ignition and may Pajeet's love be with you (two, one, it's another flop)
>>55537504
top kek
>>55536298
But somehow it improves the gtx 960s performance?
I'm looking at this and the reviewed 480 numbers and I'm seeing the the RX480 still on top? Why are the numbers for AMD on this but not on the reviews?
>>55537727
You might want to get your eyes checked.
The 1060 is beating the 480 across the board easily.
>30% more expensive
>only 5% more performance on avg.
yeah heh AMD is definitely on suicide watch, kek.
>>55537788
Well the numbers in these games on top tier systems doesn't line up with the pic posted which I assume is just another vanilla top tier system. All I'm saying. Suppose we wait and see.
>>55537809
>same price
>20% faster
Fixed that for you.
>>55537817
You're trying to compare benchmarks with different setups to each other. That never works.
Look at the one benchmark in OP where both are compared together, it's very clear the 1060 is far and away faster.
>300$ vs 229$
>60 fps vs 55 fps
you are çucked son. accept it.
>>55537820
Isn't it like 20 or 30 more MSRP which almost always means Nvidia is $50-100 dollars more on top of that. 1070 and 1080 as history shows even today.
>>55537847
1060 is $249
>>55537834
It's 249$ vs 239$ you fucking retard
How can people still trust AMD and buy their products @ release day is beyond my mind.
RIP AMD. I hope you get bought by intel so we have some competition on the GPU market. (and maybe you will learn how 2 low TDP).
so nvidia is saying that the 480 is perfoming worse than a 960 on witcher 3?
literally 65% down from every single review we already saw?
kek warcry is again shilling
>>55535967
>ashes of amdshilling
>don't outperform nvidia
wow.
>>55537873
>How can people still trust AMD
Seriously AMD is such a fuckup these days
>>55537855
20 more than 8GB version and 50 more than 4GB version. Looking at the pricing history it doesn't bode well for the 1060 pricing.
>120 posts, 46 IPs
Pajeet putting in some serious work today.
>>55535993
$300-$200 is not 10€
>>55537887
>RX 480 - 47.9 fps
>GTX 960 - 27.9 fps
I don't think 47.9 is less than 27.9.
>literally 65% down from every single review we already saw?
Different settings, dumbfuck.
>>55537965
>different settings dumbfuck
both at 1080
both with aa
literally the same thing
nvidiots just keep loosing each war
>nvidiots up to, during, and well after the release of the 480
>>55537887
there's a 20 fps difference favoring the 480. i can't tell if you're retarded or just trolling.
>>55537921
8 GB 480 is $240, not $230.
That said, you won't find a 1060 for $250 at release, because there are no cheap reference cards. Though likewise, you're not going to find $240 aftermarket 8 GB 480s either.
>>55537980
The benchmark you posted doesn't have 2xSSAA.
>damage control
>Nvidiots after yet another paper meme card launch
>No stock
>$100 over MSRP for no gains
>Panjeet wins
>>55536706
>and to nip potential performance drops in the bud
it's like benchmarking poetry
>>55538028
no shit thats nvidia recommended setting
no one will use ssaa because no one did use it before lol
I wonder how well the 1060 will do on DX12 and OpenCL. Doesn't the RX480 beat even the Nvidia cards that cost double or triple the price? Shameful really.
hahaha
Nvidia won all over again so fucking easy mode
holy shit I love it
AMD finished can't even provide a single high end card or cpu while Nvidia pulling out the Titan P in August
top keakaek
>>55535993
>MSRP
And where are the $349 GTX 1070? I'm sorry but the MSRP won't be happening anytime soon, the GTX 1060 will be at $300+, maybe around $265 2-3 months after release at best.
Here's for hoping the competition this generation gets good.
You can tell it's an edgy tween/teen by the use of Filthy Frank. Possibly middle school tween but we'll see.
>>55538136
>>55536298
Nvidia cannot into MSAA compared to GCN. As a rule GCN takes less of a hit enabling high amounts of MSAA than Nvidia's architectures do.
8xMSAA is still a card killer mind.
>>55536298
For you
>>55538259
ssa
msaa x8
hbao+
and vxao is just one hell of stupid filters
especially the hbao and vxao..vxao has a bigger impact for literally nothing
>rx480
>forced release to please autistic budget autists
>draws fucking 110w from pci-e
>pretend no problem exist
>reviews expose this shit tier gpu
>oh shit
>sorry guys he is a driver fix hehehehehe
>fixed pci-e but still draws more power from 6 pin that allowed
>dead mobo + psu within one purchase
>gtx 1060 official benchmarks leaked
>better in fucking everything
>no issues with power draw
>everyones happy and satisfied
can't make this shit up
AMDegenerates on suicidal care for years to come
>>55538074
>DX12
Depends on the game. There are 3 DX12 titles in the OP, however, according to some people, they don't count (except for ashes, the one that's barely even a game).
Then we have the 2 AMD sponsored titles that people love to post, Total War: Warhammer and Hitman, the latter not being a very good example of DX12 (see the >>55536706 and the following posts).
Then the less commonly posted titles, Gears of War, which seems to perform better on nvidia cards than amd (970 ahead of 290X), and Quantum Break, which performs better on amd.
>OpenCL
http://videocardz.com/62086/nvidia-geforce-gtx-1060-rumors-part-5-full-specs-2-0-ghz-overclocking
> Scans thread
> Uninformed NVIDIA shills
> Damage control in full force
Someone should keep an eye on these idiots
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gq3fvT9KUNc
Doom
RX480 loses to GTX 970 stock with Vulkan API
hahahaha
>>55538287
>480 forced release
revision C chip
>1060
revision A0 chip
lel
>>55538290
GoW performs better on AMD after they patched it.
>>55538290
no no they do count as of now till 1060 comes and people realise numbers were fud
>>55538317
If you use any AA beyond tssaa async compute is dasabled.
>>55538259
7970 dies too, though 680 dies a bit less.
Afaik, it's not really a case of architectures, but memory bandwidth. This is also a part of the reason why AMD cards tend to perform a little better at higher resolutions. Their cards generally have higher memory bandwidth than nvidia cards on the same performance level.
>>55538317
rip AMD
>>55538074
No they don't. How fucking delusional are Ayyymdfags?
>>55538407
It's all good man. Nothing wrong with liking exotic materials casually inserted in your anus to inflate your self importance. That's your fetish. We get it.
>>55538326
>revision C chip
>has no fucking idea what happened internally
>renaming a chip is a problem
Consumer chip from AMD is worse than A0. Lmao truly pathetic. Nvidia wins everytime.
>>55538359
Rofl. Get shit on twice as much then.
Why even argue until this shit is released?
>>55538459
>no idea
>480 comes out around 980
>gets updated goes even near it
>nvidiia release a graph
>suddenly the card is below 960
kek
D A M A G E C O N T R O L
>>55538327
From 1080 release, so I imagine it had been patched at that point. 980 Ti and Fury X perform about the same. TPU charts put 980 Ti and Fury X at the same relative performance at 1440p, so I'd say it performs equally on both.
>>55538474
Boredom of course.
>>55538482
>throws around buzzwords
>>no idea
>mentions 980 which unreachable
AMDegenerates at its finest lmaoFF
end your life
>>55538473
I don't think you understand what is being said.
>>55538528
kek
its already ahead of 980 on dx12 moron
oh i forgot dx12 is a benchmark api
>>55538533
I don't give a fuck you think. RX480 loses cringeworthly to a 970 stock in vulkan API. And makes async apparently completely irrelevant in some settings.
>>55538574
Huh, turns out stupidity can't be fixed.
>>55538574
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d8OLk2y6Aco
watch and cry
>>55538574
970 does well in Vulkan and DX12 compared to the 480 a card that is over half the original price? Really makes you think.
>>55538602
People already compared the RX480 result with other independent benchmarks. They are suspiciously low (well not that suspicious given they are directly from nvidia). Also some 1060 results imply it is almost (within 10%) as powerful as the 1070 for half the price. I call BS on the whole thing. No even nvidia is so stupid as to cannibalize its own 1070 sales.
>>55538602
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gq3fvT9KUNc
>>55538602
>using showplay record feature
bpahahahahaha
kill yourself
>>55538636
he is not aware of async. read the comments. he says sorry.
>>55538629
see >>55536032
>>55536123
and some other posts too.
>Also some 1060 results imply it is almost (within 10%) as powerful as the 1070 for half the price
Such as?
>>55538602
>doesn't show settings
>uses shadowplay to record on nvidia ingame foootage
>records gameplay from a camera on AMD
TOP KEK
>>55538602
Holy shit snacks the RX480 BTFO the 980. Meme magic is real.
>>55538602
>>>>>>>>>>VIDEO WAS REMOVED
BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
>>55538028
>That said, you won't find a 1060 for $250 at release, because there are no cheap reference cards.
All partner boards are being released on July 19th too, there could easily be a $249 1060 available.
AMD IS BANKRUPT AND FINISHED
>>55538706
>>55538602
he tried to shill this hard but failed beyond
RX480 is truly the most pathetic GPU ever made hahahahahahAHHAHA
>>55538602
>>55538728
N-no! This can't be happening!
>>55538707
I find it fairly unlikely, though if there are manufacturers who decide to make one with a shitty blower cooler, then I suppose it's possible. Most aftermarket models will likely go for $270-280, but I could always be wrong.
>>55538602
Amazing.
>>55538758
It just depends on how aggressively they want to price their card and how much supply vs demand.
>>55538602
>tfw still loses to the 980
>amd requests the video to be removed
like clockwork
They don't state which version of RotTR and I don't see Doom post post latest patch. Anyhow this is just bullshit rumor mongering until official benchmarks are out. Trusting these two clickbait sites is retarded.
>mfw Nvidia stock jumped to an all time high and just keeps going while AMD only dropped more and more after Poolaris
Its like everyone already knows
it was destined that the 480 would be blown the fuck out
OK
>>55538830
seriously its just an nvidia graph..
using ssaa that no one uses like since forever
lowering 65% the fps count at some games
literally being desperate
>>55538852
AMD literally bankrupt and finished?
>>55538862
>synthetics
>non-final drivers
cmon
>>55538852
>jumped to all time high
>august nvidia will loose licence of samsung and intel
>will jump to an all time below low kek
meanwhile
http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=AMD
someone is rising and rising and rising already 182% from the lowest of 2016
so if you're spending $400+, nvidia
if spending under $400, amd
good 2 kno
>>55535967
It costs more....Are you retarded?
also, 5% in ashes, kek
>>55538949
It literally costs 10€ more. What now?
>>55538922
But the 1060 is set to annihilate the 480 in every way, so there is literally no reason to buy anything AMD in any price range.
>>55538959
>spending 100-200 more just for ~10 frames more at best
don't be delusional
>>55538977
>literally just €10 more
>>55535967
You mean number's from nVidia's own review guide? Why wait for reviews when nVidia themselves came out to tell us early how great 1060 will be? Sign me up for pre-order.
>>55538956
Founders edition is $300 where most cards will be priced initially or higher just like with the 1070 and 1080
4GB 480 is $200, the 1060 will most likely force AMD to get their drivers together, or do a price drop to $220 with the 4GB version dropping to $180
>>55535967
>>55535993
Fake and gay
>>55538893
>making excuses
>>55538665
>TSSAA enabled on both cards
970 literally raped the 480
>>55539040
if async was on 970 wouldnt have even be able to compete moron
>>55538922
If you want speed and quality, get Nvidia.
If you want cheap unstable shit that barely gets by, get AMD.
>>55538995
>msrp will be the real price guys I swear, nvidia said so
Do you believe in santa claus and the tooth fairy as well?
>>55537868
Except people have actually managed to get RX 480s at 239/249 while, if the 1080 and 1070 launches were anything to go by, the so-called 249 MSRP for the 1060 is complete and utter bullshit.
The 1060 is obviously going to be 299 (Founders Edition jew tax) and scalpers will price gouge the fuck out of the rest of the stock.
>>55539084
N stands for quality
https://forums.geforce.com/default/board/172/geforce-1000-series/
kek 12 of 26 pages only with problems
>>55539080
wtf are you gibbering about you faggot
losing to Nvidia on software level
KEK
>people want a fucking monopoly
Please, tell me you're not this stupid.
>>55539098
days ago was some guy here who posted a 1080 at 1600+ bucks
>>55539096
There's too many faggots in this thread who are not seeing the 'Suggested' 'in Manufacturer's Suggested Retail Price.'
>>55539117
being this stupid that doesnt know that vulkan doesnt have a software solution for async..
its not dx12 solution that emulates it on OS
it literally uses the cpu for this..and the cpu cant cope with that
>>55539155
correct - the price will likely be lower than the MSRP
>>55539098
The difference here is that the only $240 480s you can get are ones with the shitty reference cooler. Will you be able to get ones with an aftermarket cooler for $240? Doubtful.
People could get 1070s and 1080s for below the founder's edition MSRP, so thinking that there will be no 1060s below $300 is honestly idiotic. Will you be able to get one for $250? Doubtful. It'll likely be somewhere around $270, but considering aftermarket 480s will cost more than the reference cards as well, the price difference stays about the same.
>>55539107
AMD is shitty quality, look at this, billions of pages full of problems
https://community.amd.com/community/support-forums/graphics
>>55539186
>nvidia allowing lower prices
>NVIDIA DOING SOMETHING GOOD FOR GAMERS
>keeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeek
>>55539126
>thinks the RX480 is competition to anything
>launch with fatal power problems
>new polaris 14nm barely fucking holds up with 2,5 year old nvidia gpu's
>runs hotter and slower
>draws more than 170w during load
>power efficient
haha wow you are truly new level of autism
>>55539189
>y $240 480s
Shit. I got mine for $189. who the fuck are you?
rx 480 out of stock
1070 out of stock
1080 out of stock
shits still out of stock
what the fukc
>>55537724
So are they are using equipment that is in favor of nvidia? seeing as the 480 decreased in fps and the 960 went up compared with the other benchmark.
Nvidia on damage control this hard. Puts out a set of benchmarks to curry sites before sale. I don't believe Nvidia has ever done this before. They must be shit scared to do this. Another marketing tactic to try and convince people to preorder the 1060 instead of waiting for actual benchmarks. They also know that one day of release all those who did not preorder will see prices skyrocket just like last time.
Pretty shameful if you ask me.
>>55539126
I want a competent company to step in. AMD clearly can not compete and is only still around because of NVidia/Intel antitrust bux.
>>55539213
nvidia guidelines must be wrong
stop talking about gtx 480 they gonna fire you
>>55539189
>aftermarket 480s
Show me one aftermarket card. Of any kind.
This is utter and complete bullshit. No one installs a cooler on a brand new card, and eBay;s it. less then 1 in 100,000 which is almost zero.
No one buys these cards except idiots.
>>55539126
i want amd to die and samsung or ibm to buy them up and start making actual good products again unlike the utter trash amd have been feeding me these last few years.
>>55539170
nobdoy gives a fuck about your async don't you get it
Vulkan is crossplatform
Your async is a fucking meme that only works under certains conditions and settings
everything else you said is straight dog shit get a fucking life
>>55539206
>implying nVidia is the one lowering prices when it is nVidia who sets the MSRP
>>55539239
This.
Let Intel buy AMD graphics division and have them actually make a difference.
AMD is totally incompetent at this point and cannot compete with Nvidia on any level.
>>55539265
Aftermarket cards as in cards from AIB partners with non-reference coolers. Are you not familiar with the lingo?
>>55539228
The 960 they're using is most likely a 4 GB version, which should explain that. SSAA shouldn't give a performance advantage to nvidia cards, though. It's generally the opposite.
>>55539247
clasic illiterate AMDrone. No argument no nothing.
>>55539274
kek
damage control
as of today doom is just a benchmark
>>55539317
there is no argument when someone lies
>>55538665
Must be something on his system. 1440p runs fine.
http://youtu.be/TGZFa7A_k-Y?t=240
Also I run it on my R9 290 and see no stuttering.
>>55539339
where
>>55539015
Lel
>>55536037
/fucking thread
>>55539402
>techyoutuber
>hur dur what is async
always knew they are retards but thats to easy.
AMD users are poorfags, simple as that.
Why the fuck do you aspies argue over GPUs? Just get what you can afford, play your autism time-sink virginity-protector and shut the fuck up.
I'm not even a gaymur but all I've ever seen is that AMD is the budget option which comes with its shitty problems, and Nvidia is the premium option which is just basically better in every way but costs more.
>>55539796
nvidia has simply had the faster single GPU for 2-3 generations now, otherwise AMD's GPUs are generally faster in the mid range
I dont play any of those games at all
Oh shit, 1060 is 40% better than the 480.
https://youtu.be/dQw4w9WgXcQ
>>55539796
You shut the fuck up faggot. This is a AMD / Nvidia discussion thread.
>>55535993
>€
Stop pretending you're relevant.
>>55539954
>$
>relevant
fucking roaring KEK
>>55540031
Ahmed, pls.
>>55539024
GG nvidiots, GG. You have shown benchmarks that prove the RX480 is significantly better than the GTX1060 despite also being much cheaper. You were so butthurt you used fake numbers for the 480 to compare with real GTX1060 numbers. It's all over now, nvidia is burning from the inside out.
>>55539024
I guess that supports this kek
RIP 1060
>>55540058
but anon this is how currency works. You are irrelevant.
>>55540130
>1600x900
oh boy this nigger needs some milk
For Nvidia to 'leak' actual game benchmarks before their GPU goes on sale is unprecedented and surely shows how desperate they are.
>>55540173
What're you on about?
>>55540173
When did you first realize you needed glasses, anon
(from >>55540130)
Lol 480 is shit compared to 1060
>>55540289
techpowerup is not using the same cpu, memory or board
your fucking imagine has no meaning
>>55540308
>50% better performance
>50% cheaper
>shit compared to it
OK shill
>>55540379
Did you not read OP?
1060 is better than 480 in every way
>>55540390
Is there any doubt?
