The truth revealed.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z5-3U3r5TRQ
> truth
> fat shill moaning
kk
>>55488211
He's probably right though.
It wasn't an engineering problem, they knew it had issues, they just rushed it out.
>>55488211
>talks about a problem even AMD has admitted to.
>hes a shill, fucking must be a paid shill totally.
>>55487698
The truth is that the PCI-E specification allows a card to ask for more power, and if the motherboard can handle it, it can decide to let the card draw more than the 75W standard.
no fucking shit, of course they knew it, how is this some revelation for this fat retard?
>>55489540
Tell that to all the people whose motherboards died when they used a 480.
>>55489540
Bullshit, motherboards have no protection against cards like the 480 overdrawing power.
>>55490329
I'd like to see a singe mobo that has died due to the rx480
>>55490371
https://community.amd.com/thread/202410
>>55490329
Oh, you mean that one person whose claim is shoddy at best?
>>55490402
>one person
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rhjC_8ai7QA
>>55490347
Liar. It's in the PCI-E specification.
>>55490371
>>55490395
Every time someone asks for proof, that one link with that one motherboard gets posted. Out of all the cards sold only that one person made a thread. Nice.
>>55490414
>I should clarify. The only motherboards that will likely experience any issues are those with terrible power delivery integration or boards from ~2006 and earlier
So literally the only argument against the card is the power issue that at most affected like 5/n units sold already, and only affected mobos that were actual shit?
>>55490418
It's not, pcie cards are only allowed to draw 75W from the slot.
That's why there's never been a card that draws more than that...until the 480
>>55489540
Yeah no. The motherboard doesn't decide how much power is drawn, it can only shut it down if there are protection circuits present.
And those aren't meant to be triggered in normal use. They are the final solution to short to ground.
More people killing their motherboard with the 480:
https://forum.ethereum.org/discussion/8037/psa-rx480-and-unpowered-risers-exceeds-75w-atx-spec
>>55490422
There's at least 10+ cases of the 480 killing motherboards and the card just came out. I'll start posting some of them here.
>>55490452
They can limit power draw. Any motherboard that isn't a cheap piece of shit that doesn't follow specifications will do this.
Tons of people having issues with the 480, this card is incredibly unstable: https://community.amd.com/community/support-forums/graphics
>>55490444
>that at most affected like 5/n units sold already,
It affects every single 480 on sale right now.
There are no aftermarket 480 on the market right now.
>>55490480
Nope, there's not a single motherboard out there that limits power draw on the pcie.
That's why the 480 is such a problem, it runs too much power through the motherboard and destroys it over time.
Killed the audio on his motherboard with the 480: https://community.amd.com/thread/202429
>>55490480
It has nothing to do with cheapness and you're not saying anything I didn't already say. The protection circuits can kick in while the RX 480 doing its thing, but that's just as fucking bad. How do you like your computer shutting down while playing video games?
>>55490499
> Nope, there's not a single motherboard out there that limits power draw on the pcie.
Stop lying. Every motherboard that isn't a cheap piece of shit does.
>>55490329
If a graphics card taking a couple more watts out of the PCI-E slot will fry your motherboard, you bought a really shitty motherboard.
>>55490514
Nope, there is no motherboard in existence that can deal with the 480 overdrawing power. All of them go over the limit or just shut down completely like >>55490507 said.
>>55490520
>couple of watts
Try 150% of rated power, which is already 300% of original rated power.
>>55490520
Actually what you did is bought a really shitty video card like the 480 that kills motherboards.
It's funny because the guy in the video above used a 980 Ti (huge power draw) and it worked perfectly fine.
Then he put a 480 in the same system and it kept crashing.
>>55490531
980Ti draws it from the PCI-E power connectors.
>>55490520
Nice bikeshedding, AMDrone.
>>55490531
Look, you can stop justifying the fact that you're poor and can't afford a motherboard that isn't a complete piece of shit and admit you're wrong.
Killed his motherboard with the 480: http://www.overclock.net/t/1604421/various-amd-rx-480-review-thread/1860#post_25309056
>>55490555
>not poor
>buying 480
Pick one.
>tfw 980 ti
>>55490555
My motherboard is great.
I wouldn't want to damage it though with a 480. The problem with the overdraw is it damage your motherboard over time, so you never know when the 480 is going to kill your motherboard. Could be in a day, could be in months.
He's correct..... Thats why I'm waiting for the Sapphire Nitro.
>>55490570
> My motherboard is great.
Yeah, no. It's really not.
>>55490532
This is not true, Nvidia/AMD bios modding on the overclockers net forum have been modding bios to draw more power from the pcie-rail and the pcie-e power connectors and you can draw more than 88watts (although not recommended) from the pcie-rail itself continuously without the pc shutting down, theres no failsafe on the motherboard to prevent a GPU from drawing too much power from the pcie-rail, i believe there were some workstation motherboards that had the setting on the bios and applied it on windows log on but hardware could still bypass the limit.
>>55490562
One doesn't stay not poor by needlessly buying technology.
I'll spend ~3500 on a show saddle before I spend $800 on a video card.
480 is even killing high end motherboards: https://linustechtips.com/main/topic/619402-amd-rx-480-causing-faults-for-pc-gamers-%E2%80%93-pcie-slots-have-died-on-high-end-boards/
>>55490588
Yup. Tom's even got it up to 200W.
No one gave a shit when the 960 exceeded pci spec. If you have ever overclocked a video card you likely exceeded pci spec. This issue is overblown and an example of fanboyism.
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/nvidia-geforce-gtx-960,4038-8.html
>>55490637
The 960 never exceeded spec.
See: http://www.pcper.com/reviews/Graphics-Cards/Power-Consumption-Concerns-Radeon-RX-480/Evaluating-ASUS-GTX-960-Strix
The 480 is the only card that goes over the limit, that's why the 480 is killing motherboards
>>55490637
Those are just spikes(what are capacitors for duh) not continuously draw like the 480.
Brand new 480 destroyed motherboard: https://www.reddit.com/r/pcmasterrace/comments/4rfou0/brand_new_rx_480_just_destroyed_my_motherboard/
Mining rig motherboard destroyed by 480: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1433925.msg15438155#msg15438155
Picture of guy's motherboard destroyed by 480, showing error code that his pcie slot is dead:
https://hardforum.com/proxy/CKbSwEeCjghUSWhturKvc%2BZs4IhT2U8ovgoAHCJ53fISkY5BmWNcLQgVJNbIP4e5jizJ3Jzz6QY0M%2FoTMy5d4Z%2Bk%2BzX%2BnHK09IAVKO1x%2FjrKzryRSCM7%2Fg%3D%3D/image.png
At least we can agree that this is far more damaging than the 3.5GB meme right? I wonder why /g/ give AMD a pass here and yet bitch non-stop about the 970. At least the nVidia card didn't fry your motherboard.
>>55490418
How about you cite it, then.
>>55487698
>guy just speculating and ranting for 11 minutes
Who even watches these videos?
>>55490795
No. You go and do your own research.
>>55490790
You think there weren't a lot of people that give the 970 a pass?
>>55489540
>bullshit the post
>>55490395
HELLO. THIS IS /u/ALKALADUR
I am the author of the reddit thread you have linked to, my reddit username is /u/Alkaladur.
The moderators on reddit have banned from the r/AMD subreddit.
In addition to this, my thread is now longer showing at the top of the subreddit.
Instead a thread that claims the RX480 is not out of spec, and that the PCI-E slots can use 300W is AT THE TOP OF THE SUBREDDIT.
I fucking love it.
>>55490469
Then do it faggot, I have been waiting an hour for it. As we can see you can't find any so fuck off shill
>>55490734
Oh this guy? His board died the day after it was announced and PC perspective said it would degrade your board after time. I guess degrade after time was 24 hours after he found out about it. I call bullshit on this guy.
>>55490897
No. The shitstorm about the 480 is far more tame than the 970.
>>55491009
>>55490734
>asrock
>expecting it to work properly with this much grease applied to it
maybe he will learn to buy a normal brand by now
>>55490445
Besides half of the nvidia cards that drew 85-95 right?
>>55491019
>tfw the 480 is raped by the 3.5GB 970
>>55491117
give it a few weeks of new dx12 releases. the relative performance and driver updated will stomp not only the 970 but also 980
why are people still talking about the "powerdraw pci-e issue"?
IT HAS BEEN FIXED WITH LATEST DRIVER YOU RETARDS
>>55491019
kek
>>55490591
You'd probably spend 60 bux on mobo too, then.
>>55491150
>AMD
>drivers
I have my doubts.
>>55491019
That card can't have 3.5 gb of memory, it's technically impossible. If it didn't have meme link, it'd have either 3 or 6 gb of memory.
>>55491138
>j-just wait..!
You people become a worse meme than 3.5
>>55487698
>BWAAAAAAAAH - the video
>>55491150
The new drivers don't even fix it. It still overdraws on the pcie.
>>55491152
Nope.
480 IS A CURSED NUMBER
THAT'S ALL THERE IS TOO IT
DO NOT TRUST THE NUMBER 480
>>55491101
The 480 is the only card that goes over the pcie spec, that's why the 480 is killing motherboards
>>55490996
You might want to look above at all the cases posted in this thread...the 480 has killed so many motherboards that I hope AMD get sued
>>55490997
It depends a lot on your motherboard how fast the 480 will kill it.
Some motherboards will get killed by the 480 in seconds because they can't handle it. Others the burn takes a while to destroy. That's the worst part, you never know when the 480 is going to make your motherboard stop working.
>>55490913
It's funny how AMD is trying to hide this so bad. The guy posts facts and then his entire post gets deleted. AMD doesn't want people to know that the 480 is killing motherboards.
>>55491302
This guys pic also was deleted from Imgur.
>>55490673
>>55491344
> AMD controls imgur moderation
Get out your tinfoil hats, everyone.
>>55491220
>i read my favorite amd ranting site which confirms dis
except it does not, it lowers relative power drawn to 68 watts on pci-e in metro last light 4k aka worst case unrealistic scenario
>>55491117
You mad!
>>55490444
Pretty much. Your motherboards has to be 10 years old and garbage....otherwise the card works great.
https://www.techpowerup.com/223981/amd-releases-pci-express-power-draw-fix-we-tested-confirmed-works
for all those trash poster which are a week behind in their minds
>>55491398
One guy lost and Asus Rampage.
>>55490491
The update already fixed it though.
>>55491404
>The second adjustment is an option inside Radeon Settings, called "Compatibility Mode", kinda vague, and the tooltip doesn't reveal anything else either. Out of the box, the setting defaults to off and should only be employed by people who still run into trouble, even with the adjusted power distribution from the first change, which is always on and has no performance impact. When Compatibility Mode is enabled, it will slightly limit the performance of the GPU, which results in reduced overall power draw.
Isn't on by default. "should only be employed by people who still run into trouble", so after your mobo is fried turn it on. "will slightly limit the performance of the GPU" ahahahaa they just gimped their card so it doesn't exceed spec. This is too good.
>>55491404
>With the Compatibility Mode option enabled, power from the slot goes down to 71 W only, which is perfectly safe, but will cost performance.
BUT WILL COST PERFORMANCE
AMD really fucked up this time and this "fix" is just insulting.
>It only happens because you bought a bad mobo!
If you bought a shitty budget brand like AMD, you probably bought a shitty budget motherboard.
>>55490790
/g/ is contrarian as fuck. You should realize that by now.
>>55491344
Yup they are trying to hide the truth.
>>55491537
WEAK
>>55491508
yea they gimped it for the retards which measure their greasy pci-e slots.
saphhirED says that 8pins are overkill
pci-e slots should be able by logic to endure much more than that because why the fuck shouldn't they handle a 80 watt pci-e draw and not a 250 watt housefire bulldozer
>>55489104
revision C
>rushed out
people still dont understand that the problem was that the card wasnt decreasing the voltage after the boost clock was gone...
Raja on Reddit : we pci express 3.0
https://pcisig.com/developers/integrators-list
ctrl+f 480 -> GeForce GTX 480 :)
ctrf + f GP104 -> NVIDIA GP104 January 15, 2016
PCIe 3.0, 8GT/s x16
no Raja you have no certification
>>55490913
Your fault for thinking free speech exists on that shithole.
Go ahead and post it on any other relevant site, though. People should stop acting like AMD is a special snowflake that dindu nuffin
>>55491508
>should only be employed by people who still run into trouble
What did they mean by this?
>>55491619
there are so many cards which aren't listed what the fuck
>>55491260
you get asked for proof you poste a link of an idiot
you get asked for the 10 proof you just say to search for it
literally being this into damage control
>>55491671
rebrands i guess
>>55491658
"""trouble"""
gtx 1060 doesn't support SLI because it could beat a gtx 1080 at lower pricepoint
who is the real gimp now?
>>55491694
except rebrands mean higher asic quality and lower voltages which would also mean new calibrations
in the end it doesn't matter because custom variants can perform much worse
>>55491742
asic needs to be a meme who ever thinks that high asic is good for anything else than a refrence card is really dumb as fuck
>>55490531
If a mobo can't handle that tiny amount of extra power requirement, then it definitely can't handle any form of SLI/Crossfire or extra PCI-E cards. Just how shitty can it possibly be ?
>AMDfags will never have the pleasure of having a perfect, working PC
Im sure all of you Rajeets secretly dream of the idea of having a blazing fast intel/nvidia PC, but know youll never get it because AMD is all you can get in India
>>55491729
A valid point I guess but for the small increase in price you'd be silly not to go for the single card solution and the better software compatibility that goes with it.
>>55491849
why someone will buy a card that will get replaced after one year
instead of one that will shit on many generations ?
>>55491672
480 has killed so many motherboards, lots of links in this thread to them
>>55491875
>He cant afford replacing his GPU every year
Damn, the hardships AMDpoors go through every day. And they even shill for a company that hasnt provided a new high end GPU since 2013
>>55491616
I read the 480 went through 7 revisions.
They kept working on it trying to up the performance, couldn't even get it there in stable condition, so just shipped it with huge power issues that destroyed motherboards.
>>55491809
Crossfire/SLI doesn't use extra power.
Each slot is rated for 75W
Problem is 480 goes over that amount on a single slot
>>55491849
I honestly think half the fun for them is scouring the internet to find fixes issues with games and other driver problems as well as cranking up the air conditioning to keep their cards from overheating in the summer all to save 50 bucks on initial purchase cost.
Note: The patch DOES NOT fix the issue.
Check pcper's investigation, it is still going over the limit on BOTH the pcie slot AND the 6-pin. This is even with compatibility mode on.
The new driver don't really fix the issue...
http://www.hardware.fr/news/14709/rx-480-pilotes-16-7-1-quelle-difference.html
>>55491902
why should they?
290x came out on 2013...
still shits on nvidia equals
fiji came
is still shitting
now 480 and not even a week have passed and they already given it a 4% boost on overall perfomance...
what nvidia has done
>hurr durr dx11 perf
>hurr durr paid shill use bf3 wow and wotanks to increase our overall fps count
>hurr durr run dx12 benches on mid to low settings
pathetic
but then again jhh got cucked last weekend as we all saw so i guess since he wont have a wife for much longer he needs to cuck his customers
>>55491849
I had a gtx 460 that died 2 months after warranty expired.
Now I have a 270x didn't have any problem in 4 years.
Also I've never had a intel processor in my entire life and I can still play overwatch at 60fps with a 6 years old phenom II.
>>55491969
poorfag detected
>>55491953
lel they can not catch a break.
>>55491911
75 watts pcie
480 81 watts pcie
>huge power isses
meanwhile they just fixed it with a bios update
hmmm
did nvidia fixed their burning drivers yet?
or they incopartibility with vive hmd
or the random black screens?
or the fried dp ports?
or the low fps count after 10 mins because the cards throttle down because they get too hot?
or the infamous dx12 driver?
oh wait when ngreedia has problems its a feature...
i mean not even apple likes you anymore
>>55491995
>or the random black screens?
What's that?
>>55491981
I could easily buy 2 or 3 new computers with a gtx 1080 on each if I wanted to.
>>55487698
>AMD's shady tactics
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=04ITA1_XoqM
>>55491962
hmm lets see
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/amd-radeon-rx-480-polaris-power-fix,4668.html
http://www.pcper.com/reviews/Graphics-Cards/AMD-Radeon-RX-480-Power-Consumption-Concerns-Fixed-1671-Driver
even the lair of nvidia pr team pcper is saying its fixed
>>55492027
same shit amd had for some time apparently nvidia has it too
the monitor just goes black and you need to restart kinda like the gpu loosing the signal
nothing serious but really REALLY annoying
oh, look, another GPU thread
>>>/v/ is your place, faggots.
>>55491194
Newfag detected.
>>55492073
Never heard of that. I know there is some windows thing that causes the graphics driver to crash every once in a while but it automatically recovers and restarts a second after.
>>55490414
>near ten year old motherboard
>made by foxconn (are you fucking kidding me?)
>benching a new video card on it
>it has problems?! *gasp*
Oh yeah, this is totally representative of the average user.
>>55491898
I did bite your bait and checked all the links. All I have to say is fuck you shill.
All of them link to the same 2 guys that had a pcie slot fried and audio stop working. I will even give you a chance and the benefit of doubt on the pcie slot. As for the audio issue, you are the one making the claims, so prove it was the 480 that killed it.
And this is from someone with a 760 looking at a 1060, mind you.
>>55492140
Who else do you think are buying mid-tier AMD cards? People with X99 custom loop rigs and Asus Rampage boards?
>>55490329
>Tell that to all the people whose motherboards died when they used a 480.
You mean that one nigger who ran 3 of them to mine bitcoins on a six your old board?
>>55492176
Didn't it also have a 450w psu to top it off?
>>55492176
say it right
a nigga that had a dual slot pcie 6 years old mobo
and he was using risers to drive 3 480...
and also had a 450 watt psu
and funny part is he didnt burned down the pcie slot but the 24 pin connector
>>55491117
>tfw the 480 is raped by the 3.5GB 970
It has 5-10% performance difference, and even that on only half the tested games (on the other half the 480 is 5-10% faster).
And the 970 already started getting gimped in drivers, while the 480 is getting performance boosts.
2 years later the 480 will be trading blows with the 1070 while the 970 will be slower than the 1050. Go ahead and screencap this.
>too retarded to turn off pc power before replacing gpu
>oh fuck
>make up bullshit about how its the card's fault so mom won't yell at you
>>55492141
Re-read them, there's like 5 people with dead boards and the 480 just came out.
Can't wait until AMD gets sued.
>>55487698
What I hated is he's saying "blow for blow with the 970" when it's two years newer and near the same price.
It's an alright card but that point he made is not impressive.
>>55492254
>turn off pc power before replacing GPU
If you didnt im sure the motherboard wouldve fried you before you fried it
>>55492057
AMD is scammy as fuck, fuck them
>>55492268
some posts up was 10
now its 5
in reality was one dumbfuck using a cheap ass asrock
and one idiot driving 3 480 on a system with dual slot
>>55492231
On that note, can all PCIE slots do 75W or only the x16 one? If the x1 one can't do that much then it is no wonder that his board blew up.
>>55492039
sure you could poorfag
>>55492057
>>55492251
In 2 years the 970 will have 50% more performance than the 480.
Eventually AMD will gimp the 480 so bad it won't even be able to run at 1080p.
>>55487698
Please don't ever post the worst uploader on Youtube or his videos on this board ever again.
>AMD scams people
>D-dey good boys, dindu nuffin! go to church erryday! my 7950 never did me wrong?
>Nvidia makes a midrange card use 3.5gb vram because nothing uses over 3gb anyway
>HAHAHAH NVIDIA IS FINISHED FUCKING JEW COMPANY SCAMMERS MUH ASHES OF SINGULARITY
I hope all AMDfags have their motherboards fried so they can stop posting their bullshit here
>>55492281
>motherboard wouldve fried you
atx is 12v, barely enough to tickle
>>55492304
the problem was he was using 2 riser cards on one slot.. and it didnt burned the pcie and that was a cheap ass mobo also..
he was literally getting double the wattage from it
>>55489174
AMD fixed it in a week. How many components or software have bugs on the release which are solved almost instantly? Fucking all of them. Why do you think motherboards have 4+ revisions? Most within the first year? Why do you think reference cards should be left to benchmarking only, and wait for third party cards with proper cooling?
>>55492322
yeah dont believe his lies
meanwhile on real life
https://twitter.com/dankbaker/status/739880981612625920
literally the journalist driver wasnt rendering all the shaders
i guess being cucked is something natural to nvidia users
>>55492344
Can't handle the truth?
>>55492350
Can't both be scammers?
>>55492378
It's not fixed. The new driver still goes over the power limit on both the pcie slot & the 6-pin.
>use 480
>no issue whatsoever
>memes on /g/
I guess some inexistant power issue is far better than the 3.5 GB thing though.
>>55492460
Both are non issues if they don't affect you.
>>55492460
480 power issue is much worse. Could kill your motherboard over time, never know when the issue will pop up.
>>55492460
You are tempting fate by even posting this.
>>55492459
pcper guru3d techpowerup toms said its fine
so its fine unless you have better equipment than they
which obviously you have
>>55492476
>already fixed
>but it's bad guys, trust me
>>55492484
Look at pcper's own numbers.
It's still drawing over the limit in both directions, even in compatibility mode.
The 480 disaster never ends.
>>55492476
you mean like the random nvidia drivers that still burns down randomly the cards?
yeap sounds like it
>>55492459
It only spikes over the pci-e slot power limit now which virtually everything does and is fine, and nobody cares about the 6pin drawing more as it's literally a non issue unless you're using a shitty bargain bin psu.
>>55492476
>>55492459
You can't really believe this is a problem, I refuse to believe people are this stupid.
>>55492459
it's less than 75W on the PCIE slot and there is no actual limit to what a 6pin can take these. They put exactly the same wires on the 8 pins so a 6 pin is never going to melt.
>>55492538
>480 literally destroys your motherboard
>not a problem
Interesting
>>55492504
obviously you really dont know what you are talking about..
obviously drawing 75-76 is way above the spec of a 75 pcie slot
hmmm either blind or nvidia really pays well
>>55492553
Not true, the 480 is still drawing over the limit on the PCIE slot and especially over the 6-pin.
AMD failed so bad with the 480, I don't even understand why they fucked up so bad.
>>55492557
It's drawing like over 6A on the 12V.
The spec is 5.5A. So he's right. It's still over the limit. Not as severely as before though.
>>55492574
see>>55492557
>>55492588
the picture from your own paid shill site proves you wrong
unless ofc you are saying they photoshopped the 70 there
give it a rest you lost end of story find something else that 480 is bad
like i dont know being red
or small
or has lower clocks than nvidia
or stealing the 480 name whatever
>>55492555
Show me a destroyed motherboard caused by the new drivers.
The other two have been widely debunked.
I also know you really don't believe what you are typing it's just you trying to rustle jimmies. Nbd
>>55492598
Sorry you can't handle the truth
>>55492504
So they just need to gimp the card a bit more.
>>55492588
Exactly. The 480 is still over the power limit. AMD is so incompetent. The 480 is fundamentally flawed and cannot be fixed.
>>55492557
Did they show how much performance is lost in compatibility mode?
Can someone explain why /g/ is scrambling so hard to defend this card?
>>55492640
I would welcome that if it improved performance like the last time they (((gimped))) it
>>55492656
it actually gained performance in both modes, but don't tell the Nvidia shills or they might kill themselves
>>55492660
Poorfags trying to rationalize their poor purchase decisions
>>55492656
nope because there isnt one
>490 is just 2x480
>drawing 180 watts from PCI
>>55492671
Wrong, the 480 lost 5% performance from classic AMD gimping
>>55492660
An army of nvidia shills has invaded and spread lies and deception.
It's a decent card for the money and that upsets people.
>>55492631
>Show me a destroyed motherboard caused by the new drivers.
Just wait, drivers just came out, the dead motherboard count just keeps piling up from the damage the 480 does.
>185 replies
>48 posters
/g/ - no life neckbeard.
>>55492688
Haha nope. Try again. Or post proofs next time.
But you won't, because you are incorrect.
>>55492688
how much does shitposting pay?
>>55492724
How could it possibly not lose performance from restricted power delivery?
>>55492724
are you asking for proof from a paid shill?
>>55491850
problem is for nvidia though the dx12 will enable good multi gpu support by default
When Samsung will buy Radeon Technology/AMD?
>>55492737
because cards tend to gain perfomance when you undervoltage them
its a common knowledge since powercolor s3.....
>>55492745
Does DX12 even need SLI? Can't if just use two 1060's in the same rig at the same time?
>>55492745
they cant even use async on hardware level and you think they will handle the bandwidth required to run the EMA on the mgpu? lol its gonna be a stutterfest
>>55492754
lol what
>>55492728
Not as much as shilling ;^)
>>55492776
cards when being undervoltage they automaticly increase the clocks to compensate
hense gaining in perf its good the 480 as refrence
aib's probably will have their own bios
>>55492073
It happened with me on 9600GS, apparently it overheats and turns off the video signal.
>>55492637
>"Sorry you can't handle the truth"
>In response to someone showing the 480 drawing less than 75W on the PCIe bus
Summerfags everyone...
>>55489540
think you got it mixed up with USB
>>55492793
>Posts correct information to correct incorrect information from a fanboy
>"Shilling"
>>55492800
Oh I've used custom bios' so long I kind of forgot people have to deal with that downclocking business.
>>55492622
5.5A is 66W. 70 is larger than 60, so it's over.
>>55492876
>if it's in bar chart form it must be true!
>>55492917
does the "how to be a paid shill for nvidia for dummies" book doesnt have guidelines to post?
or they just pick you up on walmart?
>>55492718
This desu.
>>55492759
i would bet my ass of that you aren't able to profit form dx12 multigpu if you haven't enabled an sli bridge aswell. nvidia are still jews.
>>55492770
i actually meant it in a way that nvidia won't be able to stop it. i hope people can see it more clearly now that nvidia is still trying to cuck their customers
>>55492963
Can you write that in English please, Pajeet?
>>55493012
there is a reason (actually 2) that nvidia wont give to ref cards sli capabilities...
1) they will actually be faster than 1070
2)aib's wont be able to sell many of them
>>55492251
>this faggot is happy that the 480 is able to compete with an old, 3.5GB meme
LOVING EVERY LAUGH
>>55493085
you have to be completely retarded to still believe that polaris is a flagship arc
>>55493085
there isnt really a comparison to make...
http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/amd_radeon_r9_rx_480_8gb_review,11.html
480 is just 11 fps behind 1070..and that is before the 4% it got from the new driver...
enjoy being cucked for life green shill
God this is so boring. I can't wait until we can talk about flagship cards again instead of this low-end rubbish run to within an inch of it's life in order to eek out enough performance to call it new.
>>55493197
you are right its pathetic to talk about nvidia cards they never deliver to their promise
>>55487698
makes perfect sense that they wanted it out before 1060 because no one in their right mind would buy AMemeD
>>55490529
>150%=300%
Kek
>>55492251
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>>55493271
The PCI-E slot was originally rated at 25W. 75W is 300% of that.
slit your throats AMD losers
>amd shills still don't mention that OCed 970 blows 480 out of the water while you need to apply water cooling or some other form of ghetto methods to OC 480 without reaching 90 degrees or having a jet engine in your rig.
>Keep spouting 3.5 meme which isn't even a real issue since all you will experience is a micro stutter in those 5 shitty $60 games which are protected by denuvo.
>Eat their own words every week and yet call others shills
>Muh Ashes of Singularity.
AMDrones on /g/ are closest things to /pol/'s Aussies we have.
I bought a rx480 for my wife's adult son and it fried his motherboard. He says I have to replace all the parts.
What should I do? I don't have that kind of money...
>>55493360
Give your wife's adult son your ex-wife
>>55493197
It's kind of entertaining to watch them fight over scraps and single 6-pin connectors and such.
>>55493354
I can't use hd texture mods on 3.5 vram.
NVIDIOTS ON SUICIDE WATCH
>What caused the power issues
An incompetent engineering team of poo in loos run by an incompetent company?
