[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
>compares it with gtx 960 which is already shit >doesnt
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /g/ - Technology

Thread replies: 95
Thread images: 9
File: Screenshot_2016-07-08-09-02-56.png (200 KB, 720x1280) Image search: [Google]
Screenshot_2016-07-08-09-02-56.png
200 KB, 720x1280
>compares it with gtx 960 which is already shit
>doesnt show comparison with gtx 980

Is nvidia cucking us again?
>>
>>55472641
no, because it's a replacement for the 960, not a 980 replacement.
>>
>>55472641
Nvidiots are eternally cucked. Certified GoyWorks title Rise of the Tomb Raider just got a new update today that added asyncronous compute, but they didn't enable it for Maxwell cards, only Pascal. Nvidiots spent months telling us that Maxwell could do asyncronous compute just fine though, so it's baffling as to why they'd do this.

Oh well, it can't be helped. Just buy a new card, stupid goyim. You're not poor, are you...?
>>
>>55472641
I think you're dumb af
>>
>>55472641
>1060 is succeeding 960
>op too stupid to understand this

The naming scheme is so simple even a 3 year old can figure it out.
>>
OP IS A DUMB FAGGOT

http://www.geforce.com/hardware/10series/geforce-gtx-1080

>Compares to GTX 980

http://www.geforce.com/hardware/10series/geforce-gtx-1070

>Compares to GTX 970

Nvidia isn't gonna compare to GTX 980 because 980 owners aren't gonna buy a GTX 1060 in the first place
>>
>>55472641
>gtx 960
>shit
It's bretty good card for 1080p gaming.
>>
>>55472641
>b-b-b-but it'll beat the rx480 at be cheaper!!1
nvidiots BTFO!
>>
>>55472688
OP is indeed a faggot, but I hope you also pointed out how retarded it was for Nvidicucks to hate on the 480 because it is "just as good" as a 970 when it also should have been compared to the 380/960.
>>
>>55472743
that stupid graph was warcry creation to get more site traffic...
>>
>>55472641
Hey guys, first post, but need opinions. Best way to block the systems administrators at the corporation I work for from monitoring me constantly, it's annoying and I use 2 personal laptops on top of my work pc. I believe they are using meraki network edition because he said my pc was infected when I booted my laptop and steam updated and he saw this (google it, from 2012) ReVuln_Steam_Browser_Protocol_Insecurity.pdf. so overall, best ways to block then from seeing anything, they also use other tools and no a vpn does not work. just need ideas.
>>
>>55472753
they hate it because paid shills overhyped to pascal titan x rx xfx mx brx xxx edition
meanwhile the card delivered to where raja said between 970 and 980 and they started crying because he actually did it
>>
File: rx-480-hybrid-fps-mordor-1440.png (53 KB, 711x744) Image search: [Google]
rx-480-hybrid-fps-mordor-1440.png
53 KB, 711x744
>>55472753
480 should be considered a success as long as it's outperforming a 380x. The fact that it offers up to 980 performance after overclocking is just insane.
>>
>>55472667
Nobody would even know without people like you shouting about it, thats how irrelevant it is.
>>
>>55472792
Says the guy who wants to be mr popular in an anonymous image board
>>
>>55472787
its really not that impressive desu the 980 is a old card
>>
>>55472845
The 980 (moreso the TI) was considered a 'gen-skip' card back then. Getting even close to that is something.
>>
>>55472845
This is bait.
>>
>>55472879
Nope hes right, the 980 is outdated. Also why dont they clock the 980 if they clock the 480
>>
>>55472824

And only manages to be mr Idiot anyway
>>
>>55472845
1.5 years passed since 980
>980 is old card
being so into damage control paid shills started gimping their own cards before nvidia do it
>>
>>55472911
980 was a high end card, and once the flagship.
The fact that the rx480 can match, or beat, the 980 at all while offering twice the vram for almost half the cost is a pretty impressive deal
>>
>>55472911
Because then they'd have to oc the 980ti as well and show how irrelevant the 1070 and 1080 actually are by comparison to the 980 and 980ti. Which should be considered normal because they're lower tier cards. But it was Nvidia themselves who overhyped the cards with "almost an irresponsible amount of power!" faster than 980 sli!

Also, rx 480 is cheaper than a week rental of your private loo. That's really where the hype lies.
>>
>>55472937
Sept 2014, 1 year 10 months. so close to 2 years, in technology terms thats old.
>>55472975
A card can match a 2 year old card in a few games when its clocked to the nuts. Its called progression
>>
>>55473015
tahiti is technically a dinosaur
tonga is a ancient fucking card

they are still more relevant today than then and you call 980 an old card?
>>
>>55473015
980 is still a solid performer, it's only one gen old.

Current gens midrange matches last gens high end. That's progress.
>>
Not really. Mid-card vs mid-card. If you want something more detailed, look at benchmarks.
>>
>>55473062
the ti was solid and kind of is, the 980 was meh.
>>
>>55472641
So they compared it to the same price and tier instead of a top of the line card? Weird...
>>
>>55473084
this, the only impressive cards from the last gen were the 380x, 390, 970, and 980 ti

a 980 ti @ 1500mhz core/2000mhz memory would slap pretty much any 1070 out there and would come pretty close to the FE 1080 I'd wager

>>55472787
shows a reference 980 ti beating the FE 1070 and Maxwell is more responsive to overclocks than Pascal so it'd be pretty interesting to see the comparison
>>
>>55472753
The 480 should be compared to the 1060.

The 1060 destroys the 480, 480 is one of the worst cards of all time.
>>
>>55473166
>The 1060 destroys the 480
Did the loo witch tell you that?
>>
>>55473175
1060 is 15-25% faster than the 480, it's not even a contest.
>>
>>55473178
based on what? the graph warcry made to generate traffic to his site? cause nvidia never said such a thing lol
>>
>people thinking the 480 is amazing
>have to literally wring the neck off it to produce any decent results.

That card will last you
>>
overclock 1060 will beat all amd card
>>
>>55473314
I wonder which will OC better. Has anybody fried their mobo OCing a 480 with that pcie power draw problem?
>>
>>55473361
a youtuber/company is trying the theory, just waiting for them to upload the results video
>>
>>55473370
so relevant since the driver is already here and fixed the problem

LOL
>>
>>55473386
has anyone run any benchmarks since the fix?
Has the problem been solved and has it added 3-4 fps as they claimed?
Great that releasing a card with a fuck up on it like that
>>
>>55473403
>Great that releasing a card with a fuck up on it like that
AMD couldn't physically release something that wasn't a disappointment
Like they had a kneejerk at the last second and fucked up
>>
File: 1456370665818.png (49 KB, 808x805) Image search: [Google]
1456370665818.png
49 KB, 808x805
It's ok to compare the 1060 to 960 but it's not ok to compare the 480 to the 380x.
>>
>>55473166
>480 is one of the worst cards of all time.
sadly it true
rx480 8gb should be price $199 and 4gb $150
>>
>>55473150
980ti at 1500mhz would match a 1080 if not actually being slightly better. Maxwell is 40% faster that Pascal clock for clock.
>>
>>55472641
>touchwizz
>>
>1060 performance is equivalent to the 960

but y tho
>>
>>55473193
Nvidia themselves showed 1060 is 15% faster than 480 in games and 25% faster than 480 in VR
>>
>>55473386
480 problem was never fixed, even with the new driver it still overdraws power
>>
>>55473166
>The 1060 destroys the 480
Link to the benchmark you're referencing? Thanks.

>>55472792
>Nobody would even know without people like you shouting about it
This is precisely the problem with the way Nvidia operates. Better upgrade from that outdated Maxwell, goy.
>>
>>55472670
this shit hardly means anything anymore considering the 1070 is so much more expensive than the 970 and aftermarket 1060's will probably sell for 970 prices anyway
>>
>>55473565
>Nvidia themselves showed
Ok, well if Nvidia said so then who are we to question their claims.
>>
>>55472667
Not a surprised
>planned obsolescence
Nvidia raping their gullible fanbois like usual
>>
>>55473166
>don't mind me just trying to pass bullshit as fact so I can get paid pennies
>>
>>55472787
It's not insane. This is a node drop. Going from 1 node to another is always revolutionary performance upgrade. Actually, it's kinda underwhelming if you think about it.
>>
Guess what gays. You can now use AMD and Nvidia GPU's in Rise of the Tomb Raider at the same time using DX12 multi-GPU!

Heck you can mix and match AMD GPU's or Nvidia GPU's if you like.

Brand loyalty is no longer relevant.

This is the future!
>>
File: Cuck.jpg (439 KB, 1200x1000) Image search: [Google]
Cuck.jpg
439 KB, 1200x1000
I'm sorry, did a GPU company get your wife pregnant? No? Then shut up.
>>
gpu have predecessor/successor like amd r9 380 they're predecessor of rx480, and gtx 1060 otherwise is successor of gtx 960. is been like that since geforce fx line up back in 2004 and ati radeon 9000 series.
>>
>>55473903
Please go cuck. You know the meme has changed the definition.
>>
>http://www.tomshardware.com/news/nvidia-geforce-gtx-1060-launch,32214.html
>http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2016/07/nvidia-gtx-1060-specs-price-release-date/

so is Nvidia lying about this or are these sites shilling for them? false advertisement?
>>
>>55472784
>AMDkeks projecting
My sides
>>
>$249
Any reason to buy a 480 over a 1060 ?
>>
>>55474073
We don't know yet, the 1060 isn't out and reviewed get.

>>55474041
We don't know if Nvidia lied, nobody not under NDA has the card to confirm if what Nvidia said is true.
>>
http://haifux.org/lectures/267/Introduction-to-GPUs.pdf
>>
>>55472641
>Boost clock
>Relative
>Actual
Wow, that actually tells us absolutely nothing of value. That's kind of interesting.
>>
it MAY be faster than the rx 480 but since oc headroom is larger, we would see gtx 98o perf. maybe the gtx 960 comparison was to show consumers that at >$200 you can get a good boost in perf, maybe.
>>
File: image_15.jpg (119 KB, 1438x1415) Image search: [Google]
image_15.jpg
119 KB, 1438x1415
>>55472665
Why? If i can buy an after market card for the 480 which goes on par with the 970 then whats the reason spending $50 USD more for something that "beats 960s specs"
(Im just asking im not trying to gander on you i want to be informed i currently own a 960.)
>>
>>55473517
Are you dumb?

The 980ti has 2816 cuda cores, 176 tmus, 96 rops

while the GTX 1080 has 2560 cuda cores, 160 tmu and 64 rops.

So obviously, clock by clock the 980 ti will have a higher perf.
>>
>>55473903
They just say cuck these days because they're youngfag nu-racist tryhards hung up on bbc porn and too afraid of their latent homosexuality to use the word faggot like they should here.

Kids these days. Seriously

OP is a fag btw.
>>
>>55472787
We aren't taking about that meme mobo fryer
GTFO Pahjeet
>>
>>55472784
>"raja said"
Right, like he said xfire is faster than 1080 with 51% gpu utilization.
>>
>>55474201
>makes reference to bbc porn
>calling others fag

wew lad
>>
>>55474155
Or maybe the 960 comparison was because the 1060 is the successor to the 960.
>>
>>55474073
If you can get $199 4gb and flash to 8
>>
>>55473782
Its not kinda underwhelming, its shit. Pascal is getting 50% increase in performance per smu over Maxwell. Polaris is getting somwhere around 10% per CU with its scores all over the place between different games.
>>
>>55474367
powercolor and xfx versions confirmed for bios modding but you would be lucky if you get your hands on one since they are out of stock atm
>>
>>55474388

Pascal is gets closer to 10-30% in SMU over Maxwell. Most of the performance gains is from insane clockspeeds that Pascals chip operate at.
>>
>>55474328
This 4chan bro

We're all some kind of fag
>>
>>55474235
umad cuck
>>
>>55474435
>nuh uh c-clock speeds don't count!
run a 480 at 1ghz and see what it looks like.
>>
>>55474487
LOL, they are talking about nodes you kiddo
>>
>>55472792
Go back to /a/ you weeb
>>
>>55472641
1 9 2
1
9
2

Enjoy your 5.5!
>>
>>55472911
I agree. I am sick of shitty reviewers overclocking one card and not the other.
>>
>>55474201
OP is always a faggot.
>roody-poo
>>
>>55477417
i made that i love that it gets used here often
>>
>>55472775
install gentoo
>>
>>55472792
>It's ok when Nvidia lies to me! I know he still loves me
>>
File: Kung_pow_betty_laugh.jpg (84 KB, 491x414) Image search: [Google]
Kung_pow_betty_laugh.jpg
84 KB, 491x414
We need a /gcg/ before the 1060 launches
The shitposting from butthurt 480 buyers at all the spamming during the 480 launch will be massive
>>
>>55472641
>compare it with the GTX 960
>doesn't say there is $100 difference
>doesn't say europe will be cucked again 1060 being 350 - 400€ minimum which is +150€ difference
>>
>>55474487

The point is that GPU guys have been running out of steam since Fermi/Cypress generation.

Physics has been catching up. It is becoming harder and harder to cram more shaders, ROPs into GPUs while increasing clockspeed.

You can only do so much with increasing efficient with circuit logic.
>>
>>55472665
cooler, quieter, more efficient and faster.
bonus points: doesn't burn down your motherboard.
>>
>card is a 6GB VRAM mess designed by scrapping components of a 1080 to gimp it
>Is Nvidia cucking us?
YOU decide
>>
File: 1234423341792.jpg (3 KB, 126x126) Image search: [Google]
1234423341792.jpg
3 KB, 126x126
>>55472665
>no, because it's a replacement for the 960, not a 980 replacement

So why retards in this board keep comparing 480 with 970 and 980?
>>
File: 1459866507547.jpg (50 KB, 460x276) Image search: [Google]
1459866507547.jpg
50 KB, 460x276
Holy shit, the 1060 is already DOA. LMFAO
>>
>>55472743
You know, with all these Pajeet posts with shitty english floating around, its actually starting to make sense that /g/ is filled to the brim with shills
Thread replies: 95
Thread images: 9

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.