DUDE
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /g/ - Technology
You are currently reading a thread in /g/ - Technology
DUDE
Completely pointless. Get a 6700k, this barely outperforms it.
>>55459269
>Limit 1 per customer
Imao. Fucken DOA.
>>55459269
CORES
>>55459376
I NEED CORES TO LIVE
BRING ME MORE CORES
>>55459269
t. AMD
>>55459269
Were were you when Intel started copying AMD business practices
>>55459269
>LGA 2011
Wasn't this like 3 years ago?
>>55459308
If you want two of them you'll probably be buying a Xeon anyway, which can go up to 8 socket each with an 18 core, 36 thread CPU for 144 cores and 288 threads.
>>55459269
DUDE
>>55459433
It's X99.
>>55459433
2011-v3
>>55459269
Yeah, yeah, that's all great. But we all know what the real question is. Can it finally run Crysis?
>>55459269
CORES
>>55459478
>2.2ghz
>>55459682
>muh 1GHz is worth $1300
>not taking an additional 16 threads instead
E5-2683 v4, 16c/32t
$400
>>55459429
They didnt copy the price point
>>55459269
>tfw you realize your company has more cores than brain cells
>>55459269
CORES
>>55459455
>>55459269
If you are doing something this would be good for you want a xeon anyways. Youll be better of price/performance that way.
Yeah, the prices are crazy...
I bought a 6850K instead, and even that was not exactly cheap
>>55459269
It's a hell of a processor but it should cost ~600-700.
>>55459269
Can't OC for shit.
Literal housefire.
>>55459638
Probably
>>55459956
>6850K
I've heard it's just like 5% faster than a 6800k but has some extra pci lanes, it's worth the extra cash?
>>55459956
>not using q6600
kys
ZEN PLEASE SAVE US
>>55460050
It also has better single core performance. It's perfect for gaymen with 3+ GPUs and video editing.
>>55460078
is zen going to be released this year or we'll have to wait till 2017?
>>55459638
Oh man I am LOVIN' this meme!
>>55460050
I dunno yet, haven't installed it.. It does have a slightly higher clock rate, but the reason I bought it was for the 40 PCIe lane support
>>55460070
Funny, that's the processor I had before this one on my desktop (I've had laptops in between)
Zen is going to offer this at half the price
>>55460050
Sure, if you need them
>>55460226
At this point i'm not even sure if zen is going to be released.
>>55460078
>>55460138
>>55460226
"Just wait for AMD to launch, it'll rape Intel"
>>55459433
2011-v3 i think
>>55459308
>>Limit 1 per customer
>Imao. Fucken DOA.
what did he mean by this?
>>55460276
"just wait" seems like an AMD slogan, but we need them to deliver something so they can compete with intel so it can be some innovations on cpus
>>55460340
i don't know
>>55460276
zen is a much better name for an CPU then bulldozer so there is that
>>55460276
>tfw zen is just a double bulldozer but now 14nm
>>55460619
>Zen logo
>A big fat 0
Sign of things to come?
>>55459826
I bet that's an ES. Or an ES marked as a production processor.
>>55459269
A $150 processor out preforms this shit
https://www.cpubenchmark.net/singleThread.html
>>55460715
>2016
>singleThread.html
>out preforms
>>55460715
>completely misses the point of this processor
i agree its overpriced, by a huge margin, but intel has no direct competition so they can charge whatever they want. go figure.
that said, single threaded performance is irrelevant for many-core chips. that's not what they are designed for.
>>55460078
>overclocked 5960X
>manageable heat
wew lad, that's saying something
Why the fuck are people treating a high end workstation CPU as a comparison to their shitty quad core gaming desktop CPUs?
>>55459269
you need those NSA backdoors to run at MAX SPEED
>>55460340
>>55460584
He meant it's dead on arrival since you cant buy two at once and put them into a dual socket mobo.
>>55460903
i dont think chip supports dual socket config
>>55459269
...weed lmao?
>>55460903
but why would he mean anything like that? it makes no sense
>>55460276
>>55460360
>>55460636
>I don't know what I'm talking about and can't use google to look up that Zen seems to go towards being copy of Haswell
:^)
>>55460715
>Passmark
Man, I sure love /g/ in 2016 :^^)
>>55459873
>>55460078
nvidia tier confirmed
>>55460903
Well no shit, it's not a Xeon E5-2xxx
>>55461033
>Zen seems to go towards being copy of Haswell
>Haslel housefires
>>55460715
retard. look at the clock speeds.
>>55459269
LGA 2011 can use DDR4 now?
>DUDE I SHOULD BE ABLE TO AFFORD THE BEST PRODUCTS EVEN THOUGH I WORK A SHIT JOB, I WANT IT NOW, IT'S ALL ABOUT ME, I DESERVE EVERYTHING
/Millennial General/
>>55461205
It only uses DDR4 now. You can't use LGA 2011 chips in LGA 2011-3 and vice versa as far as I know. There is no compatibility between the X79 and X99 platforms aside from the socket.
Buy used xeons morons. You can even double or quad socket for like 80 cores ffs
>>55461249
>You can even double or quad socket for like 80 cores ffs
retarded idea
>>55461033
Hi >>55460360 here:
I just said that we "need" amd to deliver something so it could bring some real competition to intel that way maybe we could see some improvements and better prices.
Said that i though zen is coming 2 years too late, and I'm not expecting big surprises.
>>55461229
I don't know much about chipset compatability, but will my Xeon E3-1280 v5 (Skylake) eventually fit on a LGA 2011 system? Wikipedia seems to be leaning towards no: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGA_2011#Server_.28Xeon_E5-16xx.2F26xx_v3.29.
Also is 2011 worth it for small workstations or should it really only be reserved for servers and/or super computers?
>>55461324
No. That will not fit LGA2011. E3-1280 V5 is a LGA1151 processor. It's fucking tiny compared to the LGA-2011 socket.
>>55460810
>muh high end workstation CPU
top kek, I bet you are a IT "specialist"
>>55459269
Bravo Intel, I can't believe there are morons that actually bought them. You can get brand new Xeons with the same core count and HT for less than half the price. I don't get this product at all. If you really need more cores, then Xeons are usually the way to go. If you want a hybrid machine capable of gaymes and multi core workloads, then a 5820k was the sweet spot. If you want a gaymen system, then you grab an i5. Broadwell-E is such a bad release, fuck. Holy shit Zen, please be at least as good as Haswell. I'll buy your 8 core even if it's $500 starting. I want more cores to replace a 3570k.
>>55461528
The Xeons have lower core clocks and locked multipliers. That's what you're paying for chump.
>>55461264
Kill yourself
>>55461218
If it's not much, much faster than a 6700k it's just not worth the money
>>55461572
Look at the single core and multicore benchmarks and suck it.
Over clocking is a stupid Jew trick to get you to void your warrenty and end up buying new shit because you broke it.
E X T R E M E [] [¯¯¯¯¯|
¯¯¯/ /
C || / /
O || / /
R || / /
E || /_/
Why can I not find a single fucking legit gaming benchmark that compares 6700k, 6800k, 6850k, 6900k and 6950k?
>>55461572
Broadwell-E is absolutely shit on overclocking.
>>55461663
it's CORES not CORE
>>55461724
one core < 10 EXTREME CORES
>Only 40 PCIe 3 Lanes.
Fuck you Intel.
>>55460647
Thats an O you retard
on the other hand, the Zen logo looks like a shit smear
E X T R E M E
C
O
R
E
S
>>55461613
I know what the benchmarks say. They say that the i7 is better.
E
X
C T
O R
R E
E M
S E
>>55460276
>>55461922
By how much??
You can get a used 5xxx v3 used for under 100 dollars and the difference is negligible
>>55461589
>have to buy either used servers or extremely expensive 2 socket/4 socket motherboards
Yeah, it's a terrible idea.
>>55462022
wtf is a 5xxx? point to the exact processor that you're talking about, because you can't get used Xeons for cheap unless they are obsolete, and the LGA2011 ones are obviously not compatible with LGA2011-3 motherboards. Which is what you want.
>>55459269
WEED
>>55462132
LMAO
>>55460715
Surprised my old ass CPU can still chug along nicely!
>>55462427
Haswell isn't old.
>>55460715
at least the 5820k or 6800k can OC decently well.
My 5820k matches 4790k/6700k single core performance.
>>55462439
It's a few generations old by now isn't it? I am tempted to go Broadwell-E... I haven't done anything to this PC for a long while now.
>>55460715
>single core
>>55462490
It's literally 1 generation old essentially.
Haswell, then broadwell, then skylake.
But broadwell for desktop only had 3 SKUs and none were sold very widely. They essentially skipped it for Skylake.
The 4790k is within 10-15% of a 6700k.
And broadwell-E is only more cores, not a different core design.
Save your money for a GPU upgrade or a new CPU in 2-3 years.
>>55462490
It's still being produced ex Xeon E5-2658 V3, so theoretically you could say it's current gen if you really wanted to.
The GTX 1060 will run amazing on this!
>>55462568
>E5-2658 V3
>12 cores, 24 threads
wat
>>55462595
What about it? It's just a server processor.
>>55462605
>he doesn't know how awesome server processors are
kek
>>55462605
I dont know why you specified that specific Xeon when there are several E5 V3 Xeons which are identical.
You specified the 2658 v3 as if it were some sort of singularity.
>>55462595
What's the point of having more than 2 cores as a single user?
The only things I can think of that'd warrant having 10+ cores is if you do 3D rendering a lot, or perhaps video encoding.
>>55462656
Because I have that specific one. Notice the two letters ex? That stands for example.
>>55462677
You could just as easily have said E5-2637 v3 which would have been a much more apt example.
It's 4 core 8 thread CPU (like his 4790k)
But in reality the E5 V2 series is more similar to the 4790k as E5 V2 is still DDR3 whereas V3 is DDR4.
>>55462524
I has the monies (yay tax refund) for a complete new system. Probably going to go for an i7 6800K and a GTX 1080 or two.
lel I have an i5 6600k, they're not going to Jew me into thinking my penis is smaller because of it and get me to buy this 2k dollar processor
>>55462729
Do you think I remember all these fucking names, asshole?
>>55462730
I mean it's your money. I'd throw that $1+ into an investment account or something.
You have no reason to upgrade for gaming and getting a 6800k will actually provide worse gaming performance for any game that uses 2-4 cores. The 6800k is clocked much lower than your 4790k. You'll need to OC the 6800k to ~4.3GHz just to match your stock 4790k.
>>55462785
I don't game much nowadays, but really am getting into content creation. Mostly photography but I really want to get into heavy video (4K+ C-LOG etc.).
I'm looking at a 5K Adobe RGB IPS display so I'll probably need a beefier GPU set-up for CUDA acceleration. Having a highly-threaded CPU will help me cut encoding times too.
>>55459682
160 cores tho.
Get a double xeon gaming keyboard (the one with cooling and 4 way SLI support) and you will get a supercomputer.
>>55463476
>keyboard
I mean motherboard, what the fuck.
>>55462451
Wew, still jelly there. I need to sell this thing and get an e5-1650 v2. Wish I could get a 1680.. Oh well, this thing runs fucking great even with my pitiful 3% oc. Stress test is still running, barely even affects my funposting
