>current year
>no operator overloading
Would java become better if he dies?
Java doesn't need operator overloading; Java needs tail call optimization.
>>55455883
And continue to bloat Java with unnecessary stuff? Brilliant idea.
>>55455928
>compile time replacement for convenient vector/matrix use
>bloat
Maybe you should stay in your comfy pure C world. Classes were a mistake anyway.
>>55455911
No. Yes. Those features are not mutually exclusive.