iseatadick6969!a safe password?
Yes.
It was until you posted it.
Not anymore
>>55441486
Just add an Xx on the end and it will be even safer.
eatadicksixtyninesixtynineexclamationmark is safer
>>55441517
No number nor symbols
It is if you use KDE and not GNOME
>>55441953
if that's the case OP's doesn't have upper and lower case letters, it's mid tier at best.
>>55441953
I don't get it when people say that.
A dictionary attack would not find it and the brute forcer does not know that, so he would still have to search up everything.
Am I mistaken? If so, proceed to call me a fagget and correct me, please.
>https://howsecureismypassword.net/
>>55441486eAtaDIck^(^(!
>>55441486
>>55441517
U.a&*3kj2a*#@.SN#[E~0d?wFj&WW=Mp23ki67Vt$s]JK_+)ri3#{q}P8KI{FAH*(wh:^) 3
Is safer
>>55442122
He was just memeing
>>55441486
I use a 19 digit password. That should be good though
>>55441953
doesn't matter, ever, except that online services convinced you otherwise during signup
youdontknowshitaboutshitguy
is a better password than
*^eNT0Py!z
>>55442168
good luck remembering that one
>>55441486
that's always the first one i try
>>55442213
https://www.passwordstore.org/
>>55442237
I live by a rule: never record a password anywhere ever.
>>55442237
What's the password to log into that site? :^)
>>55442122
A random string of words is just as good
>>55442259
That's a silly rule considering encryption exists.
>>55441486
it is better than most
but try google first
you got
http://www.passwordmeter.com/
can't find googles old password tester, they use to have an internal tester on an unlisted public link that was really good.
After working with the old google one I made the ultimate password. A simple 16 characters with a 874.53bit strength, with a 0 on a scale of 1 to 10 as "error: undefined strength value contact administrator". Unfortunately most systems just crash when I try to use it, but a few actually accept it assuming I have my own keyboard so I can type it.
Depends on if you're a dealer and hang out with autistic kids or not.
>>55441486
Haven't you seen Mr. Robot kappa
>>55442122
>I don't get it when people say that.
The issue is that a lot of services require you to have them.
>is eatadick6969! a safe password?
Not anymore since you decided to post it on a somewhat public image board/forum/etc on the active Internet where it can now be added to already available dictionaries.
>stupid fucking people will be the death of us all
>>55442447
I hope you're joking, see the op image?
>>55442237
But the password has to be between 8.3 to 10 characters long and only alphanumeric chars are allowed, but not the letters qt or the number 6. Also the max allowed distance between each character is 5 keys on a dvorak keyboard and the md5 hash of the password must not contain the letter f, but otherwise you can pick what you want. But if you make a mistake you have to re-enter everything again , wait 15 minutes and solve 10 captchas.
>>55442338
Apparently this site takes my super password, but has trouble counting the unlisted symbol as a fourth character. Which is understandable given how I created it.
>>55441486
Optimal
>>55442260
password0123
>>55442808
Holy shit
£29dick$u℉aggit▲
>>55441486
Nope, it's pretty medium. Not the worst password around, but definitely crackable. Also >>55441505
>>55441517
Marginally yes. It's not much safer than the OP's password since the translation is fairly deterministic. The only safety is from the unpredictability of the translation itself.
>>55442122
For a real-world scenario, you can assume that an attacker can see the plaintext password of 2 of your 50 accounts, and can use this information to try and crack the 48 others.
This is why password reuse makes a password worthless no matter how secure it is - because there is always some site that will leak your plaintext password sooner or later.
The only strength of a password comes from the amount of random entropy that went into its generation - in other words, the strength of a password is its unpredictability.
>>55442259
Well, enjoy your weak passwords and risk of hasked accounts I guess.
What do you think about passwordless login?
It works like this: A site doesn't have a password field but rather a login button that emails a one-time link that lets the user on the site.
Discuss.
I'm of the opinion that password uniqueness needs more focus than length. Almost everyone has heard they should use long passwords. Memorizing one password is easy. I have something like 50 accounts scattered across the web. Most people aren't going to set up a password manager or something to keep them all unique.
If you're being buttreamed, it's nice to know that you probably aren't going to get face fucked by another site because you reused a password.
>>55441486
https://xkcd.com/936/
Now fuck off.
>>55443640
This. Also >>55443573
Password uniqueness across sites is the most important thing. That's why it's best to use a password manager to generate a new and unique, long password for every site you visit - and then just remember one secure master password for them all.
>>55443586MyDickIsBiggerThanYours123aA!
Good luck cracking that
>>55443757
I don't need to, since I already know it. Don't you get it?
Your password isn't supposed to protect your account from somebody who knows nothing about your password.
Your password needs to protect your account from somebody who knows what passwords you use on other services.
All of my passwords are randomly generated with upper and lowercase letters, numbers, and special symbols.
The passsword for my password locker is a diceware password.
How safe am I?
>>55441486
What's your email OP? I have a very long answer that is not enough to convey on 4chan and I really to send it through email.
>>55443813
Bretty good breh
>>55443825
nice try
>>55443813
What password locker? If it's cloud-backed or you're using weak crypto (e.g. KeePass or LastPass bullshit), I wouldn't be too sure.
If it's local and based on established crypto (e.g. GPG), then I'd say you're rock solid.
!@#a1[insert initials of website/device]A2!@#
>>55442126
this website can get hold of your email address if you use their social media platforms lol
>>55444088
>keepass
>aes
>twofish
>not established crypto
>>55442980
>>55444332
>Being this new to crypto
It's never the crypto that's broken, it's the side channels.
It doesn't matter how good your block cipher is if you use it incorrectly.
>>55441486
>2016
>This is /g/
Fuck off
