>dvi
LEGACY
E
G
A
C
Y
>>55407678
What's the point of this thread?
I don't get it
You do realise HDMI is legacy also, right?
Underageb&
>>55407702
HDMI is not legacy.
>>55407744
HDMI cannot drive multiple displays from the one port. GPU manufacturers design their GPU's with HDMI, DVI, VGA being legacy ports and that is why for 3 monitors or more DisplayPort is required. HDMI uses the same controllers as DVI/VGA on the chip.
Stay mad normie peasant. How does it feel to get onboard HDMI only to realise it's a legacy port now?
>>55407820
> ur buthurt xDxDxD
Can you argue without that shit?
>>55407744
>HDMI is not legacy.
True. HDMI is idiocy.
And its only used on TV's anyways, so it's just SCART. And who would put a SCART port in a PC?
DP or VGA, all else can fuck off.
>>55408149
B-but senpai, i love my dvi connected monitors :^((((((
>plug your monitor with any connector you have
>it works
Why do you care more than that?
>>55407678
DP or GTFO
>>55407678
Well it is. The only drawback of DP is the lack of backwards compatibility.
Could you split a DVI-I connector and drive a VGA and DVI monitor at the same time?
DisplayPort is the successor to DVI, just as DVI was to VGA.
http://www.pccables.com/search/Wyse_Compatible_DVI-I_Splitter_DVI-D_to_VGA_ADAPTER_V-Series
fuck off with this legacy bullshit. you can always get an adapter.
>>55409114
that part is illegal!!
>>55409250
No thanks, I'd rather have a direct connection, so would a lot of other people who use dual dvi. All of us korean monitor users love our dual dvi :^)
>>55409587
>using the smiley with a carat nose
>>55407678
Why putting a vga port when passive dvi adapters exist?
