We did it bros. AMD is giving us GTX 980 performance at 175w, how can Nvidia even fucking compete?
>>55401477
By making PCI-E compliant devices.
>>55401496
Amd fanboi here but..
/thread
>>55401496
fpbp
>>55401477
I don't assume with pic related? Vega furry probably will just barely compete with the 1080.
>>55401515
If you were a true AMD fanboy youd know Nvidia has violated the PCIe spec many times before and nobody ever cared due to lack of shills to spam it on /g/ and overblow the problem
>>55401527
>>55401515
>>55401496
Fury Nano averages 20w off the 12v rail, max pull is only 43w.
Try harder, shitposting children.
>>55401496
Nvidiatards on full damage control mode
Fury Nano is the best ppw AMD has offered, all while without gimping their cards in compute performancd.
2015 is year of AMD
>he didnt buy 50 fury nanos for his bitcoin mining basement
Im deaf, btw. Had a ringing in my ears and suddenly it all just stops.
>>55401477
GTX 980 gives GTX 980 performance at 175W.
>>55401585
Yes but is it tiny tiny like the Nano?
Can it properly support DX12 or compute?
Nvidiots rekt
>>55401599
No, it's actually pretty big. Which is a good thing. Because it can fit a bigger cooler.
How about that? Does nano play games in fanless mode? I didn't think so.
>>55401620
Yeah don't wanna wake up mommy when it's past your bedtime
>>55401631
>I will have my mum buy a sub standard product and project my problems onto other people to justify myself having it
Gee lad, I'm sorry for you.
![01-GTX-750-Ti-Complete-Gaming-Loop-170-seconds[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/Lyk472h.png "01-GTX-750-Ti-Complete-Gaming-Loop-170-seconds[1].png")
>>55401496
ayyyy
>>55401728
>I don't understand power mosfets
>>55401677
>accusing others of projecting while projecting himself
refrence 980 has a 165 watt tdp, so the nano still sucks giant horse cock unless you're an ITX cuck
>>55401842
You came out of nowhere with your mum interrupting your gaming sessions because of your noisy graphics card while my mum is dead. Sounds like projection to me mate.
>>55401889
How is your mom dead when she is sucking my boyfriends dick right now???
>>55401937
Dude that's gay.
>>55401861
>tdp
That doesn't mean what you think it means.
http://www.anandtech.com/show/8526/nvidia-geforce-gtx-980-review/21
>>55401973
>not getting both girl pussy and boi pussi
You're missing out
>>55402005
And here's one with both cards,
It's not that much less power drawn at load for the nano vs the 980
>>55402051
forgot link because retardation is contagious.
http://www.anandtech.com/show/9621/the-amd-radeon-r9-nano-review/16
>>55402005
Anand measures at the wall. He has no idea what the card is consuming.
980 consumes about 180W under load maximum, the R9 nano does a few watts more. Like 185 average under gaming load.
Average because nigga Tom is measuring with super high resolution and gets the 400W switching spikes from the Nano.
Under torture test the 980 will blow it out the water in power consumption tho, because the Nano has strict power limiters while the 980 doesn't.
