>>55363381
idk what this is but it seems like it never left the prototype stage

>>55363381
kippers are the bee's knees

>>55363381
Used one, it worked just fine, but it didn't improve workflow or enjoyment

>>55363381
almost had my bachelors thesis about this (strapped to your chest and used as vr input)
before accepting it as a topic, I just asked if I can try it out for a second - was absolutely not going to work. As soon as the background changes the slightest bit, everything fucks up. It was fixed by an update, I think, but the device was still kinda shit

>>55364521
My roommate is literally writing his BA about this; where are you from?

>>55363381
(I've done a decent bit of development work with one of these)

They tried to market it as a new way to use your computer when it's really just an expensive toy. There's almost nothing you can do with it that you can't do more precisely with a touchscreen. It's not even precise enough to be used for gaming - it's just kinda frustrating. Also, it demands entirely too much CPU time (the hardware's nothing special, you're really just buying the software.)

But damn if it doesn't make a cool demo to see a robot version of your hand move on screen :D