So, will this cutie blow 480 out of the water? GTX 980 performance for what, 250 bucks?
>So, will this cutie blow 480 out of the water?
Probably not. It's only 15% better by Nvidia's own tests. Remember how two RX 480s 'beat a GTX 1080'? Those are the only kinds of tests that are used here, no exceptions.
>GTX 980 performance for what, 250 bucks?
That would be amazing, but if the 960 and 760 are any indication it'll be more expensive than AMD's comparable offerings.
>>55358999
It'll be more expensive than a 970.
>>55358999
Async?
>>55359058
That would put it at $300, and what person would get 980 performance when they could get above 980ti performance for $75 more?
>>55359077
Idiots.
No shortage of them around.
>>55359115
I don't think idiots are buying GPUs. I mean you could argue they were the ones buying the 970 over the 290/390 but I still think they value price to performance.
>gtx 1060 at gtx 980 performance
>>55358999
Blow what out the water the fucking 480 shuts down PCs doing high load because it draws 200W spike from the PCI LMAO. Only a complete mouth-breathing imbecile would buy that DOA card.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rhjC_8ai7QA
Literally a meme. If you faggots are AMD shills buy a fucking 390 and stop being retarded.
>>55359149
They clearly are given the 970 and 960 are the most used cards according to Steam. The 970 being a meme card and the 960 being the worst x60 card Nvidia has ever made.
>>55359187
>The 970 being a meme card
At least it doesn't shut down your PC if you're playing a game.
Go get your 10 rupees Pajeet.
>this is on sale at $490
evga gtx 980Ti classified
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?item=N82E16814487146
s-should I buy one? I need to replace my old gtx670 sometime this year
>>55359284
At that point, why not spend the extra $110 and get a 1080?
>>55359284
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814127895&cm_re=980_gtx-_-14-127-895-_-Product
It fucking better be 980 tier or above if the rumored $250(3gb)/$300(6gb) pricing is true. And if not, they better cut the price to compete with the rx 480.
>>55358999
Well seeing how 480s have an issue with drawing above-spec amounts of power which could put them in the danger zone if overclocked...
>>55359319
would a 1070 be close to a 980 base in terms of performance? 4k ready?
>>55359334
welp that is cheaper
>>55359461
A 1070 is better than a 980ti mate
If you want 4K I highly recommend getting the 1080 because I struggle @ 3440x1440 (21:9 1440p) on my 980ti
>>55359461
4K is a buzzword for retards, currently no card on the market is able to run games at 4k maxed out at 60 fps, not even dual 1080.
>>55359517
Actually I can, without AA (which is unnecessary considering 4K gets rid of aliasing)
Unfortunately benchmark fags count AA as "max"
>>55359512
>>55359517
yea I kinda fucked up there, I'm not expecting to get 4k monitors but I might be looking into one or two 2k monitors at some point
>>55359077
>when they could get above 980ti performance for $75 more?
Which card are you talking about here?
>>55359063
No aSync till 2018
>>55359565
1070
if you get it at MSRP once they drop the founders shit
I got my 1080 for $609 which was $10 more than MSRP but it has a custom cooler
>>55359334
I'd much rather have the 1070 windforce at $430 than a 980 ti LE.
>>55358999
The 3GB reference model might be $250. As somebody who just got rid of a GTX 780, I wish you good fucking with 3GB VRAM even at 1080p.
>>55359404
>rumored $250(3gb)/$300(6gb)
what rumor, there's only speculation.
>>55359054
>Those are the only kinds of tests that are used here, no exceptions.
That graph was retarded and it probably wasn't made by Nvidia.
>>55359687
I find it hardly improbable that Nvidia is boasting a 15% increase in performance over 480, planning to release it at 125% of its price.
>>55359726
The owner of the largest UK web store said earlier that he's expecting them to be priced at £300. And you'd think he'd know, given he'll be selling them in a week or two. That's going to mean at least $300, given that we're paying slightly less than the dollar price (in absolute terms, rather than converted) for the other Pascal cards.
>>55359785
Fucking retarded. Yeah, just go with the 1070 at that point.
>>55359785
MSRPs:
660: 230
760: 250
960: 300
Nvidia's got to be genuinely retarded to price it at 300.
>>55359856
Not really. They know that people will pay it. The 1080 is apparently selling faster than the 970, despite the fact that the 970 was great value and the 1080 is gouged to fuck.
Nvidia won. They own the market. People will pay whatever they charge.
I bet AMD Saphire ETC did extensive testing before release.
100% its either Overclocking combined with either crapp Mobo or some cheep brand 600 watt PSU
Every computer should start from the PSU and end with choosing the correct stepping RAM.
>>55359959
>a 600w PSU is insufficient for a 150w TDP card
>>55359939
They can't undercut AMD or they'll get sued by ftc
>>55360023
>cheap 600W PSU
>cheap
You'll get 970 performance at 1080p for $300.
>>55359656
The cheapest are around 500€ where i live
>>55360028
They don't need to undercut Nvidia, sell the 1060 for $240 and they win but having the 1060 cost 75 less than the 1070 is fucking retarded
>>55359785
He doesn't know the price either its just speculating. The 1060 won't be powerful enough to sell at $300.
>>55360045
And the 970 will have .5gb more VRAM.
>>55360071
You're delusional if you think retailers don't know pricing 2 weeks before a product launch (something they've likely bought and paid for)
>>55360061
>$75 less
The GTX 1070 is $450 m8.
>>55360071
I'd take his speculation over yours, friend. And we already know that the 1060 will be around 980 performance. Nvidia can easily get away with selling that at 970 prices. In fact, it fits in exactly with the rest of their Pascal pricing. The 1070 is 980 Ti performance for 980 prices.
Nvidia have kept their advantage over AMD.
But there are enough retards here on the board and elsewhere who continue to hype up the RX480.
>>55358999
If it's as powerful as a 980Ti and priced <250 it could take away AMDs only private customer base, the budget gamer.
>tfw about to blow 350 euro on a used 980ti msi gaming
Feelsgoodbrah, needed something to replace my 780ti and AMD didn't deliver
>>55360132
The 480 is good. It just needs an 8-pin and a better cooler. The aftermarket 4GB cards will cost only an extra $20. So $220 for 980 performance.
>>55360107
The founder's edition is
Wait for AIB cards, I got my 1080 with a custom cooler for $609 so I'm sure there will be 1070s for $375 like they said
>>55360102
If he had ordered them he'd say so already. No one even knew it existed until wednesday.
>>55360116
Its not even informed speculation, read the comment and hes just basing it off fitting it into the price lineup instead of performance. He rightly didn't imagine Nvidia would have nothing at the 970s i.e their most popular card ever, price point.
>>55358999
>GTX 980 performance for what, 250 bucks?
It'll cost $300, with $350 for the founders edition, and it'll be out of supply so hard that you can only buy it for $400+ on ebay.
This is the future you chose, midrange cards cost $400 now due to Nvidia monopoly.
>>55358999
I don't think it will blow anything AMD has old or new out of the water. I'm sure it might be able to keep up with an old 7950 perhaps but maybe not. Read they're gimping it with 4GB/6GB versions too which is a damn shame. Nvidia has always been more of a joke on anything but the best card. I'd love to be surprised though and see some actual Nvidia mid range offerings that lasted more than a year though. It just hasn't been the case in many (six? seven?) years.
>>55360199
3GB/6GB versions not 4GB meh.
>>55360165
The 1070 is 980 Ti performance so how the fuck is a card with 50% less CUDA cores and a 192-bit memory interface gonna be anywhere near that? The card will perform exactly the same as a 480 for an extra $100.
>>55360178
>aftermarket 4GB cards
that wont exist cuck
>>55360165
>tfw waitfagging for the RX 470
1080p, 60 FPS, on medium settings is good enough for me.
>>55360217
>so how the fuck is a card with 50% less CUDA cores and a 192-bit memory interface gonna be anywhere near that
By driver gimping and paying the reviewers.
>>55360183
There are already AIB 1070s. They are still around $450.
>>55360217
Didn't know the specifications were already out. Still, if this card was reasonably priced and much more powerful than the RX480 AMD could pack up their shit and leave the home consumer market. [spoiler]One could say they already have.[/spoiler]
>>55360085
The issue with the 970 vram is not the capacity, it's that all the vram slows down once the second .5gb partition starts being used. The 970 would be a better card if it legitimately only had a single partition of 3.5gb vram.
>>55360217
The 1070 is a bit above a Titan X.
>>55360254
They go as low as $400 already, and all the AIB partner cards aren't out yet.
>>55360193
Because you know, retailers can totally talk about what they buy from manufacturers before they're even announced
He's allowed to talk about it hypothetically since it leaked.
>>55360230
I generally play Paradox games and other RTS/Strat types for years at a time. Same boat really. Nothing besides Star Citizen perhaps that would warrant some horsepower. FPS besides Overwatch/Insurgency/CS are kind of dead on PC imo. Granted this always wasn't the case as I was a SLi fag for a few years and still played FPS and others plenty.
>>55359184
>I only read the first 4 words from OP's comment
$217 for the RX 480 8GB blackplate version. Nvidia has to come in at $250 and thats going to be for what the 3GB version.
>>55359856
ayy, your graphing skills are shti mate... here thake this fixed version.
>>55360334
Yea a fucking gimped 3GB version that won't even play a kid's game like Roblox well.
>>55360320
If he were under NDA he'd say that too retard.
>>55360334
Link please.
>>55360350
Love how all the graphs don't start at 0 that I've seen so far.
>>55360334
$30 max discount you dumb
>>55360223
Yes there will. You act like AIB cards are a big deal. They're not, they are the norm.
>>55360268
It won't be, because Nvidia is not even really competing with AMD. They have the mindshare, there are lots of people who won't buy anything AMD ever so it doesn't matter what they bring to the table. Nvidia knows they are going to lose some of their market share this gen but they don't really mind. They just want to minimize it. The 470 will be $150. it'll be around 10-15% worse than a 480. Think Nvidia will release a card that strong for $150? I highly doubt it.
>>55360366
Looks like a Jet coupon so hit up Jet.com. I picked up some 500GB 850 EVO's off them for 108/109 a piece.
>>55360366
Link as requested.
https://jet.com/product/XFX-Radeon-RX-480-RX480M8BFA6-PCI-Express-30-CrossFireX-Support-Video-Card/236c89e0b16141b39709e7282ba5fd11
>>55360334
maximum discount $30
>>55360373
>>55360373
That's because those are all fakes. Real one here.
>>55360413
Lol, even with the full bar, that efficiency is pretty bad on amd's part
>>55358999
I've generally found the Gx106 cards underwhelming. They can't OC for shit and their memory bandwidth is too limited.
I suspect the 470/480 cards with a proper 8 pin power adapter and good cooling will be better.
>>55360393
>https://jet.com/product/XFX-Radeon-RX-480-RX480M8BFA6-PCI-Express-30-CrossFireX-Support-Video-Card/236c89e0b16141b39709e7282ba5fd11
Holy fuck it's actually the 8GB version
>>55360359
>>55360334
The reference card costs less than aftermarket cards for AMD. The reference 480 (and all reference cards) are shit and nobody should buy them. Hypothetically, if the $300 is for the FE 6gb 1060, then aftermarket 1060s will be on par with the 480s in terms of price. If not, then the 1060s will cost more, and also perform better/consume less power, so the price/performance will be on par. This is all just early speculation though.
>>55360296
The 980 Ti is about equal or on par or even better than a Titan X. So this comparison is meaningless. There are a few $400 1070s, but most of them are around $450.
>>55359711
nvidia always does retarted graphs just like amd nothing new here
>>55360378
Stop sucking dick.
>>55360397
Thanks for correcting me and not being mean about it.
>>55360366
So the final should be 225.66 at jet.com
>>55360432
The 1070 still outperforms them both.
>>55360452
>waaaa /g/ is not the hugbox i thought it was
fuck off reddit
>>55360452
They're getting shittier with their codes, used to be 20% $50 max.
>>55360453
Not by a significant margin. The point being, there is absolutely no way the 1060 will be anywhere near a 980 Ti and you know this.
>>55360425
$220 for the 8GB RX480
>>55360496
damn senpai, it's so shit, they'll soon hand it out for free.
>>55360496
don't forget another $150 for a new mobo
>>55360496
That's the RX 480 STBNE
(soon to be nerfed edition)
>>55360519
stay mad cuck
>>55360489
There's almost a 10% gap between the 980TI and the 1070.
And yeah, I know the 1060 won't be 980TI tier either, I'm just correcting you about the 1070's performance. 102 to 111 fps difference is almost a 10% difference.
>>55359173
this
you'd be fucking delusional to think the 1060 could beat a 980. that's a tall order.
>>55360468
Can you please stop.
>>55358999
When's the release date for the 1060? I need comparisons on the paper a 480 would be stronger...
Btw I read that they changed names and that's the 1050 and a 1060ti will be the original 1060...
If its above 300€ for the 6gb ram non reference cards I'll probably get a 480...
>>55360383
>there are lots of people who won't buy anything AMD ever
I think that's because Nvidia have spent ludicrous amounts of money over the last decade to build "relationships" with publishers and developers in addition to their gigantic R&D budget. Nvidia made it clear that they care about the very performance top end and cut down their PCBs from there while AMD has been building alright mid-range cards and kept overclocking them until they reach 90°C and have to auto throttle. When you have the strongest cards on the market you attract a very specific type of customer. The type that wants that ultra high fidelity, max settings, 60+ fps experience(i know how pretentious that sounds) and those customers can't stop talking about how great the product is, also those customers being streamers/youtubers with 5000+ viewers and millions of subscribers turns them into influencers so the customer becomes part of the marketing.
AMD don't have the budget for either, the marketing or the R&D so they exist purely thanks to the budget gamers with 150 dollar GPUs and the contracts with Sony and Microsoft for the PS4 and the Xbox One.
>>55360581
>RX 480 confirmed for graphene transistors.
>>55359284
honestly I'm thinking of getting a 280x just so I can have some decent fp64 compute
Man, everybody would have been shitting on the 1060 if Nvidia announced it with the 1080 and 1070. But AMD messed up so bad people are actually excited for it now kek.
>wait for rx480
>wait further for aftermarket cooled ones
>960 gets announced
>wait for 960
>wait for 950 aftermarket cooled ones
I just want to upgrade from my GTX 760
>>55360656
>AMD messed up so bad
Yeah, just like Apple's antennagate and bendgate.
>>55360656
Naah
>>55360687
why even buy last gen midrange trash if you're upgrading from old midrange trash? just save your dosh and get a second hand or refurb 980ti. you can get them for $300-400 now that the 1070 and 1080 are cannibalizing sales.
>>55360550
>you'd be fucking delusional to think the 1060 could beat a 980. that's a tall order.
1060 will probably be between 970 and 980 perf or roughly stock 980 perf for $250. 1060ti will be $300 and sit between the 1060 and 1070 as a value option.
>>55360687
Quite a few choices imo. AMD wise you have anything from the 290-390 and x variants. I'd even look at 380/370 nitro cards. 480 looks to be based as well. Nvidia doesn't have anything comparable at the moment unless you nab a 980 or ti version for 200-300 which is unlikely. Check used maybe?
>>55359517
Stfu you retard. The 1080 can definitely do it. Go look up some benchmarks, there's only a few games at max settings that hover around the mid 40's, like witcher 3. Here's one doing gta v http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/nvidia_geforce_gtx_1080_review,20.html
AMD IS BANKRUPT AND FINISHED
>>55360775
>>55360827
Great rebuttal bro. My linked benchmarks cannot compare to your shitty meme
>>55360723
>>55360733
I don't have a income at this point and anything more than a 480 would be a waste since i'm on a 1080p/60hz monitor. I guess i'll just wait for sapphire's 480. Thanks for the input
>>55360892
>>55358999
>So, will this cutie blow 480 out of the water?
Yeah, instead of burning mobos it will explode them.
>>55360904
Do you wanna just dump a link to the full set of your image macros? Save you time picking the prefect one for each individual post
>>55360903
If you don't have aN income, maybe you shouldn't buy gaming gear? Just a thought from a fiscally responsible tax paying citizen.
>>55360939
Honestly, how can you say a GPU is "4K ready" if it cannot provide a stable 60fps even at dated games like W3?
>>55360939
>>55358999
>for what, 250 bucks
=400 euros in eu
feels bad to be poorfag at these times
>>55360775
But your link shows most games not getting 60fps.
>>55358999
>128bit bus
>980 performance
kekeke
>>55360956
>>Witcher 3 >>dated
Blood and wine expansion literally the best looking game ever released 1 month ago.
>>55360939
4k is a meme because there's no actual 4000p display
>>55360998
Shhh don't point that out. You might shatter their worldview. We don't need a chimpout.
so... i got a i5-4460k, should I get 1060 instead of 1070 to avoid bottleneck? or will I have it anyways
>>55360998
That's a 1080 founders edition. Never buy nvidia / amd generic, other manufacturers have cheaper models with three fans and better overclocking as standard
>>55361020
Wtf are you on about. You can buy an ultra hd tv, a monitor with 4k or uhd or a projector with exactly 4k
I need four of these budget cards to run 5K and Nvidia doesn't support more than 2 GPUs anymore. How can I /budget 5K/ without 4 way?
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/used/1081827/
>>55360959
yoooooooooooooooo, that was awesome.
>>55361020
>4k is a meme because there's no actual 4000p display
>>55361145
Turn your monitor 90 degrees, silly
>>55361047
You'll be fine, IPC improvement has been minimal,>>55361058
get the 1070
>>55361119
>5K
>27"
DisplayPort 1.4 was a mistake.
>>55361175
alright, thanks
>>55359184
wow what an epic fuckup by amd. why didn't they just go with an 8pin instead of trying to show off muh efficiency. i bet nvidia could have run the 1070 on a 6 pin but they still chose the 8 pin as a safe choice.
>only 6GB
When will nvidia stop the jewenes.
>>55361119
Nvidia does supports more than two GPU, you don't even need that "key" to unlock it like review sites were saying.
>>55359785
you do realise the founders edition is always priced way higher, right? this puts aftermarket cards at the same price as the reference 480 and i'll be getting an aftermarket one because i don't want my motherboard to fry itself.
So are the 1070 cards that are now available still founder's editions?
>>55361358
Mostly yes.
>>55361358
Listen bud, I like you, so... http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814125871 here. Hurry love, they don't last long at 429.
>>55361427
Feels bad to be yuropoor.
>>55361440
Why do you guys even look at new GPUs? It'd drive me mad.
>>55361358
They're dropping in piece though luckily. Over here in the uk the founders edition 1070 was over 450 quid 2 weeks ago but now you can pick one up for 399. They're in stock too and I'm so tempted to buy one and stick an aftermarket water block on it because I can't be bothered to wait for aftermarket cards to be restocked.
>>55361453
In price*
>>55361451
So I can fantasize about them not costing what they do?
>>55361453
Still like 500€ in Germany
What's the release date lads?
>>55361620
We'll know in six days.
guys ive tried to stay strong but my body is telling me yes
Would you go for the gigabyte 1070 gaming for $430?
Or the MSI 1070 gaming for $440?
i noticed the msi has 8 pin + 6 pin versus the 8 pin for the gigabyte, would this make a big difference in hitting a 2 GHZ actual clock?
>>55359149
You are on /g/. Look around. Literally dozens of idiots buying GPUs every day
>>55358999
Wake up my mans, it will cost at least $350
>>55361792
while the 1070 is 379$?
amdrone wake up
>>55360687
>I just want to upgrade from my GTX 760
750ti here....
Oh the Pc I will build when:
Intel newer processors are 40% better than my current one.
When Nvidia releases a card that does not get fucked in DX12.
I will use all that money I saved waiting.
>>55361806
>1070 is 379$
more like 420-450$
>>55361826
Cheapest aftermarket to actually sell so far was only $399.99. Gigabyte's 2 fan model, I forget the exact name.
>>55361826
founders editions
>>55358999
980 performance when gimpworks are in effect, otherwise 970/480 performance. the normal generation improvement.
>>55360197
No, that wouldnt be a midrange card. they'll make a *60 like they always have.
>>55361822
2500k 760 here. There just no reason to upgrade. No good demanding games, no good CPUs. Waiting for zen maybe.
>>55361806
link me one in stock then
i'll wait
>>55359711
Thank you for your shilling based nvidia defence force
Guarantee the GTX 1060 will be cheaper than the 480 here in Europoor. 8GB 480s are fucking ridiculous here and manufacturers are basically ignoring the 4GB version. Sapphire have straight up come out and said there won't be a 4GB Nitro.
970 performance for the price of a 970, thanks AMD!
>>55361964
Yeah but it's not gimped by .5GB of insanely low bandwidth VRAM and will continue to perform well for years while the 970 is already falling off.
>>55361964
But you are not considering Nvidia will outperform on crucial FPS titles where fps counts...
3gb ddr5 for $250 LMAO
6gb ddr5 for $300 LMFAO
>>55362047
The 3.5 issue is going to be an actual problem going forward and Nvidia are more than likely going to shit on its performance in the future.
Doesn't mean the 480 isn't shit value though. generational leap my ass.
>>55360609
>graphene
>higher fmax than si cmos
>of three digits even
pic related is what you're looking for
>>55361705
>i noticed the msi has 8 pin + 6 pin versus the 8 pin for the gigabyte, would this make a big difference in hitting a 2 GHZ actual clock?
not according to reviews
>>55362047
Dont think so tim, gaming on 4k 60fps right now with 4gb, most titles maxed, u mad?
>>55362328
meant for >>55362139
But no vram wont be a problem in the future, textures are already extremely crisp on 4k and dont even use up close to 4gb...
>>55359058
>>55358999
The Fucking R480 Reference model is almost as expensive as A FUCKING NON REFERENCE GTX 980 in my country.
Imagine the Non-reference 480 will be the same as a non-reference 980
>>55359149
>I don't think idiots are buying GPUs.
People bought Fury.
>>55362091
I was excited about the 1060 but these prices (if true) make absolutely no sense especially if it's like the 1070 and 1080 where you can't actually find any cards at the "msrp"
>>55358999
Why do nvidia cards look soo much sexier than amd ones?
>>55362394
My brother bought the Fury X because it was the same price as the GTX 980. He couldn't complain, he said its the perfect card even for a mini-ITX build
>>55362223
>Indium
POO
just get a 1080 and swallow your poorfag pride
save up if you need to
>>55362411
Because they use some metal too what adds "$100" for the cost. Just look at the founders edition
>>55362432
This.
By the time you manage to save up it might actually be in stock too.
>>55362432
Why? 144Hz is a meme and anything over 1080p requires a rather large monitor to make proper use of and I don't want to dedicate that much space to a desk.
>>55362362
Just like how 2GB was overkill a few years ago? GTA V is already known to go past the 970's 3.5GB and Mirrors Edge uses what, 6GB of VRAM?
>>55362473
excuses excuses nothing but excuses
>>55362223
>comparing known wide-bandgap materials with graphmeme vaporware
whatever you say, senpai
>>55362411
Good god they don't. Silver is an awful primary colour.
>>55362486
Whatever you say senpai. Call me when there's a 144Hz IPS monitor that doesn't look worse than a fucking VA.
>>55362539
just get a 27 inch 4k monitor then
>>55362223
Hey calm down Joe, nvidiots are still in middle school.
980 Ti is outdated, 480 is shit, 1070 is too expensive and too powerful for my 2560x1080 monitor. If Oced 1060 provides performance a slightly better than oced 980 I'll buy it in a heartbeat.
>>55359058
>better performing cadrd is more expesnive
call the police, this cant be right
>>55362446
I rma'd my XFX 280xs and was happy to hear that they were sending me back 380xs. I wanted to barf when I opened the boxes and saw those abominations in there instead.
>>55362485
Gta 5 works perfectly fine on 2gb cards, it scales very well. Mirrors edge on high uses at most ~3/3.5 gb vram and hyper uses up to 7.5gb but it was specifically made for the new 1070/80.
>For this latest release, DICE has taken PC visual fidelity to a new level, taking full advantage of the power of our new GeForce GTX 1080 and 1070 graphics cards.
>Making full use of their blistering performance, and 8GB framebuffer, DICE is able to dramatically increase environmental detail and shadow quality on the new 10 Series graphics cards, and further improve the quality of reflections, visual effects, environmental maps, image based lighting, motion blur, and Resolution Scale’s downsampling. Classed as “Hyper” settings, these enhancements enable users to explore a richer, more detailed city on the very best PCs and graphics cards, delivering the definitive Mirror's Edge™ Catalyst experience.
You shouldn't really base your opinions on this one game with a setting that wasn't made for 4gb cards.
>>55361225
Yea it works, only issue is no 3 or 4 way SLI for gaming, but whoever did that anyways is a fucking idiot.
I say he should go with cheaper cards that can run 5k if he isn't going to game.
>>55362574
>27 inch 4k
Yeah and I'll put it right next to a 60" 480Hz 360p.
>>55362430
enjoy your poor materials while InP dominates the thz region
>>55362498
>guy compares graphene to 14 nm cmos
>explicitly say you can't compare those
>someone accuses you of comparing
dude, you might be high
>>55362590
>/sci/
>having basic knowledge of physics
>>55359149
>I don't think idiots are buying GPUs
Nvidia has the largest market share, there is no shortage of idiots buying nvidia obviously.
I should know, I bought a 670 instead of a 290.
>>55358999
>So, will this cutie blow 480 out of the water? GTX 980 performance for what, 250 bucks?
You mean $300, or $350 for the Founders Edition, and $400 in the two places that will have them in stock.
>>55362703
You didn't completely screw up.
You could've bought a reference 290.
So will it actually be 3 gigs vram or 2.5?
>>55362780
>Just Nvidia my computer up
>>55362394
>>55362426
i've been out of the gaymen hardware loop for a while, what's wrong with the Fury?
>>55362411
Because you still live with your parents kid.
>>55358999
>2.5gb
wew lad. It just cucks itself.
>>55361205
Apparently they went with the six pin because cheap prebuilt companys are too stingy to put power supplys with 8 pin connectors in their builds. This allows the 480 to be the "performance" option for every dogshit pre-built out there.
>>55359856
>660: 230
>760: 250
>960: 200 <----
FTFY
In all honesty, the 3GB version seems kinda weak even for 1080p. I just got rid of my 280x in part because I want more VRAM. Many cards have the 4GB config now. There are only a few with 3GB and even fewer with 6GB, but 6GB>4GB.
>>55362661
Interestingly the 8GB 390 doesn't do that well, indicating to me that it isn't powerful enough for all that VRAM. Makes me be glad to be getting the 4GB 470.
>>55361822
Good job
>>55361806
Haven't seen a single 1000 series Nvidia card at MSRP
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8lTGk0R12gs
>>55367699
> Interestingly the 8GB 390 doesn't do that well, indicating to me that it isn't powerful enough for all that VRAM.
We've known this for a long time. There are even articles about it which prove the 390/x can't use that amount of vram because they're simply not powerful enough to crunch that amount of data.
>>55360959
how fucking old is that gif
>>55363395
My understanding is that it was super hyped, and turned out to be rather mediocre as far as high end cards go.
>>55362389
Get a 980 then, it's better.
>>55358999
why da fuq did they not release this same time 1070, wtf nvdia
>Nvidia conveniently starts advertising the 1060 as having 980 performance
>Just after "AMD shills" were saying the rx480 would beat the 980 when it clearly could not
Was this a ruse cruise all along?
>>55371174
Nvidia also said the 1070 would beat the titan x, and it did.
Tables seem to have turned and I don't trust AMD anymore instead of not trusting Nvidia
Why is 10 series stock so terrible? Is this the most obnoxious paper launch in tech in a long time?
>>55371185
AMD themselves never said anything about 980 performance.
>>55371185
This.
The 1060 will easily match the 980, while the 480 cannot.
>>55371234
It will also be more expensive, and more efficient
>>55371255
It will cost basically the same as the 480, $250
>>55371271
I doubt it
>>55371288
It will for sure, it's following the same price point as their other 10 series cards.
960 was $200, now 1060 will be $250
>>55371271
That would be great, although i'm not that hopeful.
We'll see, we should know within a few days. Some are putting the launch at the 7th.
>>55371227
>$500 level performance
Or some shit like that.
>>55371408
Yup. Funny the 980 Ti is now $500
>>55371325
960 is just a tad bit higher than half of 970.
Nvidia retarded pricing of their lower end puts 960 in an horrible price/perf chart.
1060 is about 30% ~ 25% of 1070.
Given the performance and price history, I doubt that it would be any lower than $270 for 6GB version.
Sub $250 might be for the 3GB version, but that amount of ram is barely enough for modern title.
>>55358999
If it's close to 980ti and less than $250 I'll get one.
>>55371527
Nvidia doesn't price their cards based on performance, it's just a tier.
970 was $330, 1070 is $380 (+$50)
980 was $550, 1080 is $600 (+$50)
If they follow the same pattern the 960 will have to be $250
960 was $200, 1060 will be $250 (+$50)
>>55358999
>1060 is 20% faster than RX480
>much more power efficient
who would have thought after looking at 480 reviews.
AMD truly looks finished, they yet again miscalculated and launched a poorly performing GPU while Nvidia has been slaughtering them at high end with 1080/70 and soon 1060 at mainstream.
>>55371586
Yeah but it will most likely for the 3GB version.
>>55371174
the differnce is nvidia is saying 1060 will beat its own card 980, so its basically 100% it will beat 980 or nvidia gets crucified. AMD never said themself it will beat anything, just its shills spreading lies (because they knew it could beat 980).
Also remember when shills were spreading lies thatn 1070/1080 will have exact performance of 980/980ti? You think it was the nvidia shills that were spreading that and pot poo in loo?
>>55371206
nvidia cant pay big moneys like smartphone makers, etc for wafers, so they wait in line.
>>55371637
3gb version will be 1050ti. Why? because few 1060 will be defective and nvidia doesnt like to waste money so they rebrand it as 1050ti and give it 3gb memory.
>the no name nobody 1060 literally stole a year worth of hype from the 480
HOW DID THEY DO IT LADS
>>55371866
480 coulda been good if AMD didn't fuck up so bad
>>55371854
Pretty sure GTX1060 is an already cut down version of the bigger failed chip.
We won't be seeing 1050ti for a long while, at least till Nvidia is done with Volta.
>>55371917
>GTX1060 is an already cut down version of the bigger failed chip
You're wrong. GP106 is a completely different GPU using a much smaller die. The 1060 isn't harvested GP104 parts.
>>55362917
I benchmarked my old 780ti at the stock 1163mhz and is beat out the 970 and matched the 980.
idk why the 700 series is so low on that list.
>>55371113
kek
I bet the euro vendor is a dumbass who considers the 480 to be on par with a 980
where I live it's 100 dollarucks less than a 390 and 970, BUT I am waiting for the Sapphire Nitro model.
Nvidia's green bar benchmarks are Witcher 3 and Rise of the Tomb Raider, so RX 480 +15% is exactly the score of a stock GTX 980.
>stock GTX 980 performance
>3GB variant is obsolete the day you buy it
>6GB variant will be $300+
>Pascal overclocks like shit
Custom RX 480 models are the way to go. Rumors say 1500MHz or more, which would make them 20-25% faster than the reference model.
>>55360496
Where?
>>55372487
jet.com
>>55372460
>Custom RX 480 models are the way to go. Rumors say 1500MHz or more, which would make them 20-25% faster than the reference model.
Still going on with this shit despite proof of the opposite? It's actually the 480 that overclocks like shit. Some Korean or whatever couldn't even get 1500mhz with a waterblock
>>55372528
reference RX 480 is power limited. Putting a waterblock on it won't change that.
Even with a custom air cooler you can get constant 1350Mhz, which is a 15% performance increase out of the reference 480. On a custom board with more power you can easily get 1500Mhz.
Remember: reference RX 480 actually clocks below 1200MHz in games, so that's what all the benchmarks are running at.
>>55372460
The 1060 should be much faster than the 480, but much more importantly, it will be much more reliable
>>55372460
>Custom RX 480 models are the way to go. Rumors say 1500MHz or more, which would make them 20-25% faster than the reference model.
Please don't start with this ridiculous AMD lies again.
This is exactly what people lied about with the 480 in the first place.
In reality, the performance is going to be very underwhelming as usual.
>>55358999
>cutie
This gpu has more edges than a rekt poster on /b/
>>55358999
Nice tripadoos
Newer 70 series is always on par with previous 80 series
It's the same with 60/70 ones
Gtx 1050/60 will be at 960/70 levels (respectively) but with better efficiency, less heat, newer features, etc.
>>55371227
AMD advertise 2x RX480 beating a 1080.
The 1080 beats 980SLI in average so people were expecting 980 performance.
>>55372702
That's not actually true, the performance increase is much more than that
For example the 1070 is about 25% faster than the 980
As far as im concerned 480 is blowing out itself [spoiler] from motherboards [/spoiler]
>>55373110
ONE JOB
>>55361822
>submitting to botnet os for muh gaymen performance
dont fall for this meme anon, while vulkan is becoming a thing
>>55373022
The 1070 is on par with the 980TI
>>55373595
It's actually a bit faster
>>55373733
Stock versus stock. It's no faster when both are overclocked, and indeed falls behind once you start reaching ~1500MHz on the Ti (which most can do on air with no problems).
>>55359461
1070 is basically a Titan X with less VRAM and no Double Precision.
>>55362703
290 cost like +150euros when i was buying 670gtx i think.
>>55362091
>>55362396
>>55362859
>>55365414
>>55367699
>>55371527
>>55371637
Literally nothing in the leak says anything about a 3GB version.
It will be a 6GB card, and unless they want to price it out of the market, it will probably be $249 MSRP. Hell I'm not sure they'll even do a founders' for a low end model like this.
>>55375067
>it will probably be $249 MSRP
It'll be $300 minimum. Screencap this, faggot.
>>55362917
this doestn make sense radeon 200 series was released 1.5y later than 600 nvidia.
600series are vs hd7000 series.Which is fairly equal comparison. Why do nvidia faggot always try to twist facts?
