Is Chromium truly removed of the Google botnet? Every other browser is shit tier.
>>55357877
No it's not
>>55357877
Iridium is the botnet removed version of Chromium. Use it, senpai.
>>55357877
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=786909
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=792580
>>55358295
>posting a fixed bug from a year ago and a non-issue related to GCM as proof of "botnet"
Going to have to try harder than that. Especially when the binary blob was noticed immediately by freetards who actually audit the code, meaning that if it did happen again, you can be sure you'd know about it instantly. The fact that they haven't noticed anything amiss clearly means there is nothing.
>>55358629
Are you saying that you still trust a complex piece of software that once downloaded and executed arbitrary code written by Google?
I don't have the time nor the skill to audit all of chromium and then compile it every 6 weeks, so I just avoid it to be safe.
Just use the inox patchset.
>>55357877
After the Debian bug, you'd have to be a fool to trust it. If you must use a Chromium based browser, use Iridium or Inox (Arch only) with the unGoogled patchset. Some might argue how can a small fork compare in updates and security to the mainline browser, and it can't but that's the price for privacy.
>>55358141
>hi guys i am a retard and don't know how open source works and i use windows 10 xdd
>>55357877
Just use firefox
>>55358629
Hello Google shill
>>55359183
what bug?
>>55359195
chromium is open source
>>55357877
thesimplecomputer.info/the-private-life-of-chromium-browsers
tl;dr no, its not, but if you are not going full red pill, then it doesn't matter.
>>55358093
does Iridium have things suck as noscript and ublock origin?
>>55358141
>>55359183
> Inox (Arch only)
How the fuck was I not aware of this? Must try!
>>55360314
Does it matter? You can install those plugins yourself if you'd like.
