So if we fix the last series naming scheme
>380x would be 290x re-brand
>Fury x would be 390x
>370 would be 285 rebrand
Therefore, as it should be, x80 from AMD competes with x70 from nvidia.
>280x competed with 770
>380x should have competed with 970
>480x should compete with
But 480 is competing against 970 instead?
Will 480x offer 1070 performance or has AMD fallen too far behind?
>>55348536
kys nvidiots
>>55348590
>AMD can't produce competitive hardware
>let's blame nvidia
Kys
what amd should have done:
>380 = 290
>380x = 290x 4gb
>390 = 290x 8gb
>390x = fury x except with 8gb gddr5
>480 = should have been 100mm2 larger with 50 CUs. then it would be near the 1070 performance wise.
>>55348590
>>55348797
>kys
kys
>>55348905
WHY ARE YOU SUCH A HYPOCRITE FOR FUCKS SAKE
Let's face it, AMD cannot compete with Nvidia on anything but price anymore. Their cards will not line up with any of nvidia's lineup, they will simply produce old tech at bargain bin prices.
>>55349248
But as it stands, the 2 year old 970 is just as good value as the brand new 4gb rx480.
I liked ATI's 4000 and 5000 series naming schemes
>>55349325
Yeah that is an issue. If AMD could actually sell the 480 at $200 it would be a good value, but it's going for fucking $350 which actually makes a 970 even better.
>>55349368
>3.5
>>55349375
Only an issue to AMDrones losing sales to the best value GPU so far :')
>>55348536
I'd ask if you have fun creating bullshit but the rhetorical statement would be lost on you.
holy shit that AMD babe was hot
>>55349593
She has a name you dumb cunt.
>Ruby
>>55349632
Did he insult your waifu?
>he doesn't realize that 280xs are 7900 series rebrands
fiji and polaris are the ONLY NON-REBRAND CARDS MADE IN THE LAST 5 YEARS FUCKING AMDIDIOTS
>>55349744
You didn't even read the op...
The one on the right has the face of Paris Hilton, lamooo...
>>55350870
That's Ruby you uncultured swine.
