>buy AMD gpu
>End up losing $150 because it kills my PSU
>$150 I couldve spent on a superior Nvidia card
Why is AMD the budget brand?
>>55307798
what the fuck is this bill and stallman from?
>>55309434
Prequel to Gurren Lagann. Kind of obscure but basipally it's a meme
>>55307798
They're not.
>>55309621
>dat frame time spike
Was the the poor GTX 760 having a stroke?
>>55309434
photoshopped stallman, 30 year old bill.
youtube.com/watch?v=QqfjiuqVrV4
>>55309649
N-no that's the way it's meant to be played
>>55309675
Actually, I think it was a problem with the i7, the R9 280 has a spike too, but only when paired with the 3770k.
>>55309649
Probably a vram bottleneck. 280 is 3gb, 760 is 2gb.
>>55309864
But how come it doesn't happen when paired with the i3?
>>55309884
Good point.
I have no idea then, maybe because the i3 has a slightly lower framerate it might actually help prevent those spikes since there's less work being done on the gpu?
It's only 4 frames though.
Anyone else got any input?
>>55309621
Still have my 760 from 2012 coupled with a 4690k. High/max settings on virtually every game at 75 fps. Literally no reason to upgrade for another few years.
>>55309947
the framerate difference is negligible.
instability in the i7's OC. there's a frame time spike with the r9 280, but not as bad
>>55307798
I use a $21 PSU and I've been like that for 2 years. You're a retard if you spend that much on PSUs.
>>55310002
you get that privilege for using power efficient Nvidia.
The anti-AMD shilling needs to stop. This is too much! Are THAT scared of a $200 card?
>>55310086
They're scared of a $200 card competing with a $350 card, which they have every right and reason to be afraid of.
>>55310081
I use AMD faggot. I don't pay for overpriced shit because I'm not retarded.
>>55310125
>200$
Nice meme.
>>55310125
Except it can barely challenge a 970
>>55310147
>tfw jewish tricks don't work on you.
>>55310125
What is the big deal? If a card cannot compete at its current price, the seller will lower its price till it is attractive again. Everyone wins!
Do these people not realize that if the RX 480 is a failure, nVidia card prices will remain high? If you are an nVidia fanboy, it is in YOUR best interest to have good cards from the competition, so that you can buy your nVidia cards for cheaper.
You come to /g/ and projectile vomit your FUD in 12 different threads, but for what purpose? Do you thinking your wailing and teeth-gnashing will change anything?
>>55310002
>PSU
>21 buckaroos
Enjoy your soon to be housefire.
>>55307798
Wow, Pajeet...that is truly some shit bait you have there.
>>55310187
>implying I'm an Nvidia shill
literally what leads you to believe that?
>>55307798
Nvidia shill thread. Sage.
>>55310187
Because emotion doesn't lend to thinking clearly.
>>55310234
That is a plural and generalized "You", and not (You) you.
>>55309977
800x600 doesn't count.
![Wall mounted PC[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/FGyfhC6.jpg "Wall mounted PC[1].jpg")
>>55310394
This is now an AMD shill thread. Bump.
>>55310450
>>55310450
Wtf I love AMD now
>>55310568
>meanwhile at Nvidia and Intel
>>55310175
its right but ok...
>>55310182
>implying the 970 would dare to challenge the mighty RX 480
>>55309977
This is an absolute lie
I have a 760 as well because I don't play video games very often, and it can't even hit 60 on overwatch's max settings at 1080
It's probably passable for most games but don't delude yourself into thinking it's some kind of wunderkind
>>55310449
It's actually 1440x900. Lately I've been in-home streaming from a laptop though at 720p 60fps. Still better than consoles.
>>55307798
Wait. Didn't we have this thread already.
>>55310743
You're only 1 tier away from console graphics though. The 750 ti is a console tier GPU
>>55310695
>max settings
>>55310695
It isn't a lie though. I will say though that I had a bit worse of performance with my FX-8350. Great CPU still but I would have gladly paid for my 4690k the first time around. The latest game I played was TW3. Played it on High settings without HairWorks and it ran at 64 fps for the most part with bigger and long dips to ~50, never going below 45. It isn't a "wunderkind" or whatever buzzword you pretended I said, but its more than enough card for me.
>>55310776
I don't necessarily think like that but I see your point when everyone else has at least a 960. Its 720p on max settings, and a consistent 60 fps. Both of those are already better than current consoles by miles. When I'm not streaming its 1440x900 High/Max settings at 75 fps (that's consistent for most games I play, but I don't play many new release titles).
>>55309864
Why the hell is Nvidia so stingy with the ram?
>>55311191
Good games barely use 2 gigs.
