Who else fell for the "an i5 is more than enough meme"?
I have this thing clocked at 4.5Ghz and if I'm playing for example GTA 5 and watching a 4k video on my second monitor i can notice a FPS loss in the game.
Wish I had never listened to you /g/
fugg you
Only poor people has i5s lol
>>55245206
Fuck you
>>55245206
mahnigga.wav
>>55245221
Well, I'm still on my 3770k at 4.8, so i guess our cpus perform equally in games that can't use more than 4 threads
I upgraded from an fx6300. Depending on the title, you won't see much improvement in gaming. I think in cpu dependent games a 6700k will sometimes yield about 15-20fps more than an i5.
>1.388v
Good god I hope this OC is the BIOS auto OC feature. If not then you're bad at OCing or you got one of the worse chips. 4790K does 4.8Ghz on that on all cores with HT enabled.
>>55245186
>fps loss
I'm sorry for your loss
>>55245281
Your eyes can't see more than 4 cores.
>>55245186
Yo nigga, you trying to play Gta V and 4k on an i5? That ain't no meme, that yo mom screamin; get an Xeon
Hyperthreading is placebo
>>55245285
Skylake can take higher volt.
Shouldn't the GPU decode the 4K video?
>>55245285
I'm sure you meant to reply to me. Its from having it set to adaptive voltage and it being overly aggressive.
I had cpuz stressing the cpu when I took the screenshot.
>>55245329
This. On Skylake anything past 4.6ghz usually sees more than 1.35v being used.
>>55245186
Should have gotten an athlon 880k and stronger gpu instead you dumb fuck.
Always prioritise gpu for 4k.
>>55245351
For some reason, it doesn't.
I've tried enabling/disabling the option for hardware acceleration in chrome and firefox and still, it's all done by the CPU.
I don't have a fucking clue.
>>55245497
Nevermind, it works fine with Firefox and even fucking Internet Explorer.
But not with Chrome, what the fuck is going on?
Why I can't use the hardware acceleration in youtube witch Chrome?
>>55245601
chrome cucks you with vp9
which no gpu (except in phones?) will decode yet
>>55245608
What a bunch of dirty jews.
>>55245186
Jesus Christ you're retarded.
>>55245862
Bite me faggot
>>55245186
>playing GTA 5 and watching a 4k video
are you a grill? only grills can do 2 things at the same time.
>>55245283
what speed did you have the 6300 at? Mine manages 4.6 at 1.475v but trying to push 4.7 makes it crash
>>55245186
This is true. I switched to a 3770K when I noticed Mass Effect 3 would lag when I convert a movie in the background. That never happened on my underclocked notebook i7s.
>>55245283
@1080p yes.
>>55245318
4K isn't really CPU dependant, I do it myself and won't utilize more than 30-40 % per core.
>tfw have a 4790k
>tfw it is so close to a 6700k in virtually every real-world task
>tfw picked it up for $250 during black friday
>Not making your own educated decisions and listening to a literal tech troll board.
I just got given an i7 2600. Is it work buying a motherboard for $80 to upgrade from my FX4350?
Yeah, so I got an i5 6600k and I really don't know what you're talking about
>>55248469
Oh dear, send it back asap
> TFW got i5-2400s instead of a proper CPU and can't into GTAV\4K wihout lags
>>55245186
do you even know how a gpu works?why the fuck you watch a 4k video and play a heavy game while having 2 monitors? unless you have novidia then its understandable
>run gpu stuff
>LOL MY CPU SUX
????
>>55245601
Youtube uses VP9 if your browser supports it, and Firefox has it disabled by default (media.mediasource.webm.enabled set to false). If you set it to true it will use VP9, which offers better quality and smaller filesize, but doesn't support GPU acceleration yet.
>>55249118
Should have gone x58
you fell for the multi-tasking meme
>>55245459
Few people on /g/ understand how cpus work for vidya. GTA V is a great example of how a game scales to only a few threads (4 in this case) but will still devour whatever hardware you can feed it.
Point is: At 4k just about every current desktop class cpu from both AMD and Intel are more than enough to keep up with any gpu at 4k. We would need gpus considerably faster than what is available for cpu to matter at 4k again.
>>55245186
>dat voltage
Dude, I got it clocked at 4,4 and the voltage doesn't got beyond 1.180
You pressed the OC genie button?
>>55245186
>1.4v
OC genie is shit mate. It put my 4690K 0.2 GHz down and 0.110 volts up.
>>55245186
Damn i5 AND Skylake? OP you need an intervention.
>>55247565
yes
my i5 has never been enough for 120hz at 4.5ghz for many years. It wasn't enough at 4.8ghz for PS2 emulation at the time either.
>>55249986
How though, the CPU is 1.2V at stock voltage
>>55250425
That's kinda high for an intel cpu, and even if it is 1.2v stock, you shouldn't be forced to add more than 0.1v.
>>55250417
PCSX2 is a lot, lot better on the cpu side these days.
how long until I can simultaneously watch 4 films at 1.5x speed in 4k on a single PC?
it's how /tv/ taught me to watch films but the switch from 1080p to 4k seems to be a bit difficult.
>>55250488
at least 4 more years
is 3ghz ram worth it? it is somewhat cheap now
>>55245186
Is the second monitor running off the same gpu? If it is that's your loss of frames
>>55245186
Fuck off back to >>>/v/
>>55251098
for what purpose?
gaming? expect a 1-5 fps difference between 2100 and 3200
>>55251374
Krait 300 @ 1.9ghz
Adreno 320
2gb ram
who watches a video while playing games? why can't today's ADD generation just focus on a single task?
>>55251647
Doing daily quests in WoW
>>55253244
the greatest fake benchmark ever. Tiptop bait.
>>55253260
better?
>>55253260
>fake
http://www.techspot.com/review/1089-fallout-4-benchmarks/page6.html
>>55253392
>http://www.techspot.com/review/1089-fallout-4-benchmarks/page6.html
>Fallout 4
KEK
>>55253392
Literally some piece of shit console port from Bethesda is the only thing where 2400mhz ddr3 matters.
Fuck off to /v/ you nincompoop
>>55253521
The claim was ram speed makes little difference and evidence is presented showing it can make a large difference. Now this evidence is irrelevant because you dislike it? Fine, but it doesn't change the facts presented.
Now had the claim been single vs dual channel, then we would not be having this discussion. Single vs dual is irrelevant.
>>55253563
>one example
>one game
>by Bethesda
>EVIDENCE
Basically, if you have an assumption (ddr3 speed above 1600mhz matters) and you want to prove it than you need to show consistent evidence, not just cherrypicked a shity unoptimized console port.
A: there is a difference between 1600mhz and 2400mhz
B: game gets more fps with 2400mhz
therefore 2400mhz is significantly better
Basically, Fallout 4 is probably the ONLY game out there to perform differently with ram above 1600mhz. And the graphics aren't even that good. And the whole game isn't even good, it's garbage.
Unless you run an APU that utilizes ram, you will see absolutely no difference between 1600mhz and 2400mhz most of the time.
>mfw
