Here's some interesting information /g/.
If the OC leaks about the 480 are true and you can get 1.6GHz on stock cooler (around 25% performance increase), and the non OCed card is around 980 performance, then if you take the frame rates of the 980 in pic related and add 25% of that number on, then the result is 90% of the 1070's performance.
This is just speculation on speculation though, so take it as you will.
>le grafix card threada against
>>55225579
>Linear scaling
That could be even more with an aftermarket cooler
>>55225579
I doubt the 25% OC, maybe with a serious cooler on it. It's stock performance will be somewhere in the ballpark of 980 to R9 Nano, giving it about 75-80% of the performance of the 1070 for about 52% of the price.
Compared to the 1080, about 57-63% of the performance for about 33% of the price.
Honestly I would not buy a 1070 or a 1080 at this point unless I planned to buy 2 of them for gaming at 4k.
2 480s in crossfire will outperform a 1080 even taking into consideration scaling. And you could put that extra money towards a nice monitor with freesync/frame pacing enable.
>>55225954
>he fell for the 480 CF meme
If you want tippity top performance go for the 1080. If you want better performance per dollar get the RX 480
>still making threads when there are only rumor/propaganda statistics
>>55226310
https://youtu.be/SM8MAWa7gXM
https://youtu.be/BN7bEnMs9bc
https://youtu.be/5amDuBHloqk
https://youtu.be/tZ3wjKKi0sk
https://youtu.be/0u6t3l7Wts4
>>55226372
There is no proof that these are real
>>55226461
https://www.instagram.com/p/BG-TWLWwDHp/
>>55225579
>OCing in 2016
Enjoy your instability pleb.
>>55226372
damn the new doom gameplay looks utter shit
>>55226529
Maybe, but it's fun as fuck.
>1080s go for $800-$900+
>Get 4x RX480 for ~$900
>it smokes 1080 and 1080 SLI in benchmarks
Nvidia can't do triple or quad SLI anymore btw.
>>55226613
The reason they removed it is because scaling becomes shit after the third card. It might even hurt the perfomance. So 4x 480 WILL NOT be a fun experience.
>>55226484
hot
>>55226613
>four-way crossfire
yeah good luck with that
>>55225579
Lol, the overclock becomes more every 'leak'
>>55226249
Aaaand /thread.
>>55226656
No, they removed it because AMD was kicking their shit in with superior scaling and the fact you don't need a pricey SLI bridge.
>>55226676
i know i'm getting so triggered that AMD can have high overclocks now too.
>>55226656
4X 480 would be a fun experience for any number crunchers wanting to save some money.
Literally the price of single 1080 and twice the performance.
>>55226862
~20% is kicking the shit out of someone
they stopped doing because double sli and crossfire is fucking stupid for a 2 frame gain.
amd will likely follow suit eventually.
>>55227124
>i don't know how multi gpu scaling works
>>55227212
ok, a bit under 2x >>55226862
>>55227212
Its 1 inch longer, it looks like. Assuming your 750ti is 5.7 in 460 is 6.7in. Just add half a thumb length to the card.
that chart is meaningless
literally fucking meaningless
15 game average of fucking what?
how the fuck have they even calculated that result?
what the fuck?
if you think that collection of colored lines represents anything, fucking kill yourself
POO
>>55225635
>>55225579
Ahh yes, becuase 25% clock speed increase equates to a 25% performance increase.
>>55229080
Based on the benchmark leaks with Overwatch, the RX 480 pushes out a framerate that is 75% of the 1070's, so an overclock like the one in the leak should bring it up to at least 85%
>>55230261
And that's still with reference cooling and without the finished drivers
http://www.techspot.com/news/65328-amd-radeon-rx-480-benchmarks-bare-pcb-photos.html
>Doom ~100 FPS
>The Witcher 3 ~60 FPS
>CS:GO +200 FPS
>GTA V ~60 FPS
>Overwatch ~100 FPS
All on Ultra without OC and not yet using the newest driver.
Get hype!!!
>>55225954
Holy shit you're one autistic fuck
>>55225954
>Honestly I would not buy a 1070
But it has overclocking potential as well, even if the gap between an OCed 480 and an OCed 1070 is smaller than between a stock 1070 and 480, the 1070 still fits a niche that the 480 does not. I have a 1440p 144hz monitor, so I bought a 1070 because everything AMD has said about the rx 480 pits it as a good card for 1080p somewhere between 60 and 120 fps.
But if the 480 actually is this miracle card and not just a 980 with better power/performance and price/performance, I'll sell my 1070 and get one.
>>55225954
You should always prioritize single GPU performance over dual. The only cards you should be running 2 of at the moment is the 1080.
>>55226613
>now you're required to use a giant case and an expensive PSU
No thanks.
>>55230417
He never sad you were "required" to
You're both autistic
>>55230458
You are literally required to buy a more expensive PSU to power 4 cards in crossfire. You also need a motherboard that supports 4 way crossfire and has 4 double wide PCIe slots, which increases the cost. I'm just saying, 4 rx 480s in crossfire carry additional costs besides just the cards that make it more expensive than a single 1080. You could technically install a 1080 on a $100 mini ITX motherboard in a $40 mini ITX case with a $30 PSU, while you're going to be spending much more on the motherboard/case/PSU.
>>55230261
Overwatch is heavily CPU dependant, i'd take that with a grain of salt.
Honestly, you can (or should be able to based on specs) build a 4x 480 system for scant more than two 1080 founder edition cards alone, and they'll probably scale just fine if the DX12 drivers are any good whatsoever.
But I'm interested in where AMD´s higher-end cards are, if they're even still going to target that market segment.
this card will max out bf4 easy right?
>>55230545
Or, or, you could buy a second PSU and independantly power the cards your main supply cant reliably handle. Much cheaper than spending for a 1500w unit.
>>55231364
That's just so clunky I think most people will stick with the single card solution unless they're like hardcore bitcoin miners or something. I'm not even saying that to root for Nvidia here, AMD will inevitably put out a card on par with the 1080 and it'll probably be a better value than four 480s.
>>55232149
You're a fucking idiot anyways who actually thinks someone is going to mine bitcoins on anything but a custom ASIC, or that anyone would actually quadfire. On that note, at stock settings, a 1000w PSU is more than enough to handle 4 480s plus the entire system
I was simply pointing out what some people do in extreme situations, like that one guy who still has an 8x GTX 570 system
Now go be mommy's little retard somewhere else and let people who can actually think talk about technology
>>55231327
Yes.
>>55232999
>taking some anonymous comment on the internet this seriously
Did I offend you personally somehow? I just don't see a situation where four rx 480s would be equally or more convenient than one or two gtx 1080s.
>or that anyone would actually quadfire
Well >>55226613 proposed it.
>>55233075
That guy was obviously using sarcasm, you, you're just stupid.
Now run along and play with the other kids Timmy but dont forget your special helmet.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R_4Ut1DI4wA
>>55233328
Again, did I hurt you personally or something?
These AMD shill threads are so tiresome.
I feel bad for the no life AMD fanboys who think the RX 480 is going to be some kind of second coming.
Yeah it's a good card, but you are just making AMD look bad by making up bullshit statistics and running with rumors. Let the card stand on its own or you look like a fool.
>>55234147
>>>/v/
summerfag nvidiots belong on /v/
Could I crossfire 2 480's on a 520 watt PSU?
>>55226484
>https://www.instagram.com/p/BG-TWLWwDHp/
>>55226372
All links now broken/taken down, yeah they were real........ppffft
>>55230292
>cs:go 200fps
confirmet bullshit
I have an old as fuck gpu but an i5 and pull 300+fps....
>>55230261
and then what happens when you clock the 70.
Wew it goes higher
