LOOK WHAT I JUST BOUGHT
>>55215233
kys
>>55215233
g'day
>buying a 970 days before the 480 is released
You're like some kind of retard. Oh wait, you're Australian so I guess that's normal.
Is 4gb still enough?
>>55215233
AMDPOORFAGs won't be happy, but you made a good decision my friend. Enjoy the superior performance and driver support of the winning team.
LOOK WHAT I JUST BOUGHT
>>55215280
Hahahahaha banana
Enjoy your DX12 Async and your VR
RX480 is faster then a 980 and $130 cheaper then a 970
>>55215278
yeah.
probably should have bought a card with 4gb.
ɟןǝsɹnoʎ ןןıʞ
>>55215233
>4gb
>>55215280
Thanks friend.
My buddies putting it together for me right now
>>55215280
You mean Nvidia Poor Fag. Who the fuck stills buy a 970.
>>55215309
>and your VR
you do realize that nvidia has an incredible advantage in VR (just for pascal though, but still)
>>55215330
a shit card with a good cpu wtf.
>>55215309
i thought it was about the same as a 980?
so much conflicting info
>>55215338
somebody who already has one? 2x 970 SLI can be really good for 4k
>>55215330
what? are you not man enough to put it together yourself?
>>55215341
970 is an outdated 28nm Maxwell die shrink. Also AMD will sell more RX480 then any single card on the market for VR.
>>55215233
>>55215373
oh right, where did you get that information from?
>>55215354
The GTX970 starts to drop frames after 3.5GB if you SLI it you're basically pushing 2 gpus with 3.5GBs of ram It's like having a big dick but it really doest get hard. So you cant really fuck a girl the right way.
>>55215373
Keep dreaming, delusional poorfag. Nobody wants AMD hardware. Their very name is toxic at this point. Even they know that, which is why they're trying to sneak the 480 under just the Radeon brand and avoiding mentioning it's from AMD on the boxes.
This time next year, after the failure of Zen, there won't be an AMD any more. And thank god for that.
He said he'd get me a better cooler next week so I can overclock it
>>55215403
Well based off polling data one would assume a 200 card will outperform a 450 dollar one.
>>55215245
underrated
>>55215406
Do you have any proof???
>>55215367
Just leave the thread. The only intent here is to frustrate.
>>55215437
Are you THIS retarded
Google it
>>55215354
>2x 970 SLI can be really good for 4k
>>55215457
So you can't provide any proof?
How do you fail this bad at shilling?
>>55215233
heh it looks like you stepped on your toes OP i just had an ASUS Z170A arrive DOA have fun with your GPU goyim
>>55215472
http://www.pcgamer.com/why-nvidias-gtx-970-slows-down-using-more-than-35gb-vram/
get rekt
>>55215233
>he bought 970 when the Rx 480 is nearly here
>>55215410
ARE YOU KIDDING ME?
Without AMD and competition for NVIDIA enjoy your stagnant development and higher prices
>>55215415
wow, ALMOST the same mobo. I hope yours works, but, stock cooler?
IT'S 2016 COME ON
>>55215437
Enjoy the read:
http://forums.evga.com/GTX-970-in-SLI-Has-a-Major-Issue-no-matter-what-brand-m2298768-p2.aspx
And...if you spent money on two 790's you should have just gotten a 1070
>>55215460
Read a bunch of tests saying it's better than a Titan x
>>55215507
>buying amd
How poor are you?
>>55215539
Hey back off man I'm probably gonna buy a 480 for my first build
>>55215539
>Giving money to pricegougers for no reason
JUST
>>55215532
So you quote forums. K
http://m.hexus.net/tech/reviews/graphics/82060-evga-gtx-970-ssc-sli-vs-titan-x-r9-295x2/?page=4
These are actual benchmarks
got this for $AU150
>>55215563
I keep seeing people talk about 480s and having Vietnam style flashbacks to my old Fermi rig
used 970's are the best bang for the buck on the market. $230 on ebay all day long which is cheaper than 780ti's and 290x's in the $250 range.
>>55215573
3.5 memes aside that's a terrific price
>>55215487
>implying that matters
http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/198223-investigating-the-gtx-970-does-nvidias-penultimate-gpu-have-a-memory-problem/2
>>55215573
i r8 3.5/4, m8
>snsv
>>55215487
Yeah the actual performance drops are basically identical to the 980, only in synthetic tests can you even find out that the problem exists. WHAT IS YOUR POINT MATE?
>>55215589
That bad?
The price looks about right for me, probably get a $200 monitor with it and be good with 1080
>>55215521
>Without AMD and competition for NVIDIA enjoy your stagnant development and higher prices
AMDPOORFAGs always post this bullshit with zero evidence for it. If anything, without AMD bumbling around incompetently Nvidia won't have to spend as much on marketing, and as such will be able to spend more on R&D for new chips. AMD's very existence is holding technology back.
>>55215625
Ok so you're paying for the adverts.
And hmm I seem to remember a company that had over 90% of the market share, oh yeah that company was called Windows and look how that went
>>55215521
>enjoy your stagnant development and higher prices
Uhm... Where were you when nvidia made their mid tier gaming card perform better than last generation's top tier card for less than half the price?
>>55215617
>>55215601
>>55215598
What's wrong with 3.5
>>55215653
I wasn't in the market for a GPU then, cool story though.
>>55215278
I have some bad news for you
>>55215702
What?
>>55215568
I did not quote ant thing "This is a quote" I posted a link. The GTX970 uses 3.5GB and the last .5 is controlled by another slower memory controller thats why the frames drop. If you use a SLi set up you still use the 4GB but after you get pas 3.5 you will slow down just like on a single card. If you want a 970Sli setup cool, do you. but even Nvidia said the last .5 runs on a slower controller. EVERY OTHER 4GB CARD DOES NOT DO THIS.
>>55215410
> he wants nVidia to have a monopoly
> he wants nVidia to keep raking in the cash but not be forced to innovate anymore because there's no competition
> he wants to pay $2500 for a GTX960 because there's literally no other options so nVidia can just charge whatever
Aiight
>>55215601
That chart can not show frame drops
>>55215691
I could get a 1080 or whatever but I'm taking it easy on my first build no need to break the bank yet.
They will defend this.
>>55215472
> he can't into Google
> he can't into YouTube
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=gtx+970+3.5gb
will defend this.
>>55215573
Holy shit where.
I'm waiting for benchmarks, but I'm considering the 480. I only play at 1080p, so if I can net a 970 for $150, sorry AMD.
Hey what I'm confused about is if the human eye can only see about 24FPS why do we need shit that can do 30, 60, and 144FPS?
>>55215731
I know what the problem is, it just doesn't seem to apply to real world scenarios for some reason.
defend this.
>>55215770
I would defend that. But I don't play horrible games like that. So it does not bother me
>>55215731
i agree it's bullshit and should have never, and hopefully will never happen again.
that being said, if you know your vram usage and play om 1080p for the foreseeable future, one or two 970's is an acceptable choice.
>>55215753
as an amdfag this does make me feel good.
>>55215233
>another person caught out by the shitty orientation metadata
When will it end? When will they scrap this piece of shit tag?
>>55215777
Big Graphics just wants to jew you out of money.
Everything can run perfectly fine at silky smooth 24FPS on integrated graphics. Wake up, sheeple.
>>55215233
I have a 970. Why the fuck did you not wait for 7 days you insufferable moron? This is why Nvidia is so ahead, they're the Apple of GPUs. It's funny how Apple themselves opt for AMD most of the time.
I just bought a GTX 1080, and I know close to nothing about graphicards. Should I have bought this instead ?
>>55215719
3,5 gb isnt enough
>>55215573
Where? The cheapest on Static Ice is still $399.
How much is a GTX 1070 in burgerbucks?
I'm taking a look now and the cheapest one in an online store down under is $769 dollarydoos.
>>55215819
Ok I was wondering. But why is electricity 60 FPS then? Is that why a few milliamps can kill, because it's not the right FPS as humans?
>>55215233
>your performance after 3.5
I need the image, I can't find it.
>>55215753
What game is this?
>>55215753
>windows 10 game
Nice try.
>>55215851
It literally says down the bottom. Gears of War Ultimate.
>>55215778
Not in the real world?
See this video then read the comments.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XWffQrveWao
>>55215827
Good thing it's got 4GB then
>>55215828
He probably grabbed it from eBay or Gumtree or something.
http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/EVGA-GeForce-GTX-970-SC-Edition-4GB-GDDR5-Memory-/201609041211?hash=item2ef0d5d53b:g:C2EAAOSwmtJXUrrC
>>55215330
>i7 6700k
>gtx 970
wew lad
>>55215884
Was that from it hovering around the 3.5GB mark, ducking above and below every few seconds?
>>55215304
16 mb is overkill you'll only ever use 4
You did better than me I guess, but i'm just going to get a gtx 1070 later anyway.
>>55215837
Nah, cause electricity is used for more than just computers, and the higher FPS the electricity is, the better it can power things, so if it's only a bit hot, electricity running at the standard 24FPS can run an air conditioner just fun, but if it's mid-summer and really humid, you might need a more powerful PSU in your house so that the electricity can run at 30 or even 60FPS, depending on how hot it is.
>>55215884
I have to say I am disturbed that we are at a point where playing an FPS game is trying to be hyper realistic in the camera movement and body motion and using hands and feet when climbing, yet when you interrupt reloading a weapon, by changing weapon or whatever, it is still instant and when you go back to that weapon you start reloading again from the beginning.
If you drop the magazine out it shouldn't be there when you switch back. If you're half way putting a new RPG into your launcher you should either have to wait to pull it out again or lose it.
If you want instant change shit then aim to be more of an arena style game than realistic FPS.
>>55215980
If you want as close to realism as possible, you don't go for Battlefield, you go for ARMA.
People who say Battlefield is realistic have never played an actual warsim.
>>55216009
When ARMA get to the point of proper development I will play it.
Look at what I just bought~!
>>55215960
Thanks, it makes sense when you put it that way. I'm glad I just got a new one, shit was SO 80+ gold.
Check out my interpretation of the discussion of GPU's on /g/ after several weeks of observation and feel free to make improvements!
>>55215233
Kek should of got a 1070
>>55216074
Fucking tell me about it. They're talking about getting DX12 sorted on it in the future and it's just like, mate, maybe work on the horrendous memory leaks and optimisation that would make a pre-alpha game blush.
That being said, offline, ARMA 3 runs pretty decently for me on Medium settings, which still looks really nice. It runs at like 45-50FPS in single-player campaign, but 25-30 in online MP matches.
>>55215889
yes
3 5 8 4 M B
5
8
4
M
B
Get shilled
>>55215330
>skylel
>970 3.5 edition
kys
>>55216152
>>55216201
>kys
You should all kill yourselves.
>>55215233
>buying a 970 when the 480 and 1070 exist
even if you only paid $150 for this you fucked up bad anon
>>55215304
I've been spooked
>>55215943
It stops working at 75%
>>55215960
HEY WAIT A SECOND
DC POWER RUNS AT 0FPS
YOU LIAR
>summerfags
>>55215233
... Why when the rx480 that comes out in just a week not only makes that obsolete, but costs far less than everything but their dumpster tier cards?
>>55216375
But the rx480 will cost the same and perform the same, why wait?
>>55215233
>4x longer lifespan
didnt know ASUS was into bullshit marketing
>>55216395
NEITHER DID I TILL I GOT MY MOBO
4 X DOA = DOA
>>55216386
It also uses less electricity
>>55215233
great b8 m8
You bought an upside down picture?
>>55216463
That's nice.
>upside down pic
>must be in Australia
>>55216543
Kek
>all these butthurt AMD poorfags
>>55215304
jesus man! that's some next level shit you're handling right now!!
>>55215838
I can't find it either but here
>>55216885
That'll do. I'd love the one for that very same card with the log curve indicating 3.5 performance.
>>55216885
Have you got the one where it's exactly that, but the gif starts stuttering once it hits the 3.4 mark?
>>55216083
I don't really like the harmonic distortion of a tube amp, but hey, have fun with your meme amp
>/g/ bitches about 3.5
>970 still wrecks anything AMDefunct within that price range
>b-but muh Poolaris!
>>55216951
WTF no dude i din't know theres such a gif!
>>55217011
>pays for 4gb
>get 3.5gb
>well its ok atleast its not amd
>>55217011
you do realize Polaris will outclass 9 series by literally everything
>performance
>support
>wattage
>price
>size
>>55217011
> i don't care that I was lied to, based nvidia
You are the sort of consumers that businesses fucking love.
>>55217043
What?
>>55215233
>GTX 970
>RX 480 literally 1 week away.
>Even if it fails to meet the hype, will still be both stronger and cheaper than a GTX 970.
You fell for the NVIDIA meme, OP.
>>55215233
Good for you.
I'm waiting for my 480
Kinda off-topic, but does anyone have an R9 Nano? How is it?
>>55217054
>>55217098
Did you faggot(s) even read? He said it was $150. You can't fucking argue with $150 for $250 value.
>>55215304
What in the holy hell is that nightmare?
Look what I just bought.
>>55217154
>$150 vs. $200.
>Assuming he's not a fucking toddler who can't get a job, probably has an income.
>$50 is not hard to save up.
>RX 480 50 dollars more.
>Even if the card fails to meet the hype, it'll still be significantly stronger than a fucking 970.
>>55217169
Sex
>>55217208
>it'll be significantly better
Maybe the gpu will be better, but it'll be horribly held back by drivers and poor optimisation.
GTX970 is simply the better buy.
>>55217229
>Held back by drivers and poor optimization.
Did I just step back into 2009 or did you really just use that argument? Now I know you've fallen for the meme of GTX. Don't worry, I too once fell for it and overspent on a older NVIDIA card over a new AMD because I thought the meme was true.
>>55217229
lets see AMD has released the 1000 series with the 1070 and 1080 and still releasing drivers for the 9k while AMD only released their RX480 to compete with Nvidias market share. The 390 became almost twice as powerful after driver updats from launch. I agree Nvidia has better legacy updates then AMD but when they just released a new card and want to compete i cant comprehend how they would fuck up their driver support.
>>55217269
I also fell for the Nvidia is more expensive because its higher quality meme. I used to own two Nvidia cards in my SLI setup and one of them broke unexpectedly for no reason. Got an ATI card thats been serving for me for years with no problem it looks like Nvidia has more quality control issues then AMD does.
>>55217270
AMD also has much worse launch drivers. Look at how the hd7970 and 290x have progressed since launch.
It's not because of good drivers, it's because of less incompetent drivers. Considering AMD is a budget option, most people will also be using a weaker cpu and will suffer much more from driver overhead than shown in the benchmarks using a 6700k.
Until they fix their drivers, AMD is simply a poor choice right now. Crimson was a step in the right direction though, good on them.
>>55217317
And don't get me started on Linux drivers...
A gtx650 could probably beat a 290x on Linux.
>>55215233
I have that same card. It's loud as fuck. Return it and get a different 970 while you still have the chance.
>>55217169
Fancy.
>>55217347
A 650? I don't know. I think proprietary drivers and 960 can beat every single AMD card on Linux right now, that is unless I've missed new benches with AMDGPU Pro or something.
>>55216463
>amd
>less electricity
nice try anon
>>55215233
>>55215573
You lucky dog, it would cost me 620 AU if i bought it in my country.
>>55217720
I'll consider AMD when I want a gaming GPU on windows, but since I primarily use Linux it's useless to me.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x6GN4mI_5-U
>>55217795
So how do they keep getting away with it?
>>55215537
You'd be wrong.
>23 june
>buying a gtx 970
>>55215330
>not waiting for Kaby Lake
Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhh
>>55215278
>4gb
oh, anon! how's your first day?
>>55218078
I can't find the link now but I saw earlier they are working hard on Linux support to go with the RX 480 launch. I found this though.
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Radeon-RX-480-Is-Going
>>55215233
>he bought a GTX 970
>he didn't wait for RX 480
>>55217795
+5GB? o rly?
>>55218189
Because there's nothing wrong with the 970, it's all memes.
>>55215601
>>55218254
The 970 is the better choice.
When will the 480 hit shelves?
>>55215330
>i7 k
>970
You might actually be retarded
>>55218372
are you fucking stupid??
>>55218442
You get shadowplay.
>>55218442
Are you? Gtx 970 will perform better, or on par, with the rx480 at an almost same cost.
When the alternative is AMD...
>>55217158
Can we ban embryos from the board yet?
>>55215233
did they ship it with the whole memory?
>>55215341
what is that incedible advantage? that they just added async time wrap that amd has it like since 2013?
what happened to /g/? Falling for pathetic bait like this...
>>55218201
>posting techpower up total average fps
>the site uses bf3 as a bench to gain massively on the average fps
>also uses wow as a benchmark
>not to mention cod 3 that was heavy only on a powercolor s3
>thinks its relative to have such a diagram of a stupid site as a fact
>2016
>>55218381
29 of junes with pre order list
>>55216254
Fuck off with this unreleased shit. It will take a while even once released to work out whatever bugs that may launch with it.
>>55218586
what bugs? its a fucking hardware not a game a batman game
>>55218613
Ever heard of a fucking driver?
>>55216131
Arma is cpu bottlenecked. I have a 970 and a 6700k and it runs at 70fps on a 100 + player server. Settings maxed (apart from scaling @ 150%
>>55217079
Not that guy, but a 970 owner. I knew about the problem before I bought it (it was in the tech news everywhere) and you know what? It's still a great little card.
>>55215233
Lol, you couldn't wait another 5 days for this shit to be sub $200?
>>55217100
Pre-ordered I hope, I mean it will definitely be better than the 1080, that is clear, so why not pre-order because amd never disappointed ever
I fell for the 970 meme too, I got overly excited browsing the black Friday sales on newegg last year and ended up buying a garbage system. Might just start fresh and build a new system when I start college in a few years
The 970 is still a very good card. The 390 may get a few fps more in some games but runs hotter etc.
Just enjoy your purchase for the next 2-3 years and then switch to a dx12 gpu
>>55215521
>Without AMD and competition for NVIDIA enjoy your stagnant development and higher prices
then someone will fill their place in the market. that's how a free market system works.
>>55218910
>he believes in the free market
you stupid goyim
>>55215521
>stagnant development
What? How would they make any sales if progress stops?
>>55215280
>driver support
enjoy getting fucked over by GameWorks a year later
>>55218496
They call it single pass stereo that basically doubles vr performance. This is currently the most realistic way to get 90+ fps per eye if you don't want to spend 3k on gpus
>>55218956
>single pass stereo
aka async timewrap aka preemption....
they wont get 90fps on this generation at all
im too bored to search now but you can go into the origin ceo twitter page and see on his photo the system nvidia used to showcase their asynctimewrap feature...
they had a tri sli 1080 running and he said the middle one was for the physics.. and still the demo had stuttering..
people need to understand those kind of techs needs a high level of parallerism something that nvidia wont have till 2017/18 or at least when volta comes
>>55215252
Australian? What how could you kn-
Ohhhhhh.
>>55215304
>survival of the fittest
why were GPU companies so cruel back then? Wtf are they aiming?
>>55215304
what a savage GPU
Can't wait to get the rx480 8gb lads
A $230 gpu equal to the 1080
>>55219172
I will get 2x 480 8gb. It will make 16gb which will be enough for at least 6 years. I can't wait.
>>55215252
howd u know he was australian
i geniunely want to know this
>>55219039
>aka async timewrap aka preemption....
no you stupid cunt that's absolutely not what it is. In "stupid cunt terms" - which is applicable to you, I guess - Single pass stereo uses the calculations for the one eye for the other eye as well. Instead of rendering a complete frame for each eye (which would mean doing a LOT of redundant calculations), it tries to reuse as much as possible. So you're basically just rendering for one eye and then do a little bit of processing (and rendering of reflections and stuff, I guess) for the other eye, drastically improving performance.
>>55219172
>waiting for these benchmarks
The first time that I'm holding out for AMD's cards
You got memed dude.
>>55219250
god i hate when people thinks that just because novidia names something with another name it literally means something new...
news flash
its ATW TECH that is what was missing from maxwell 2.0/1.0 and pre gen thats why they were so fucking BAD at it you cant do anything on vr without having some form of asynchronous timewrap involved aka 2 fucking pipelines one for the eye and one for the another one but that has still the cost of context switch which nvidia claims is below 1ms and for that they need to have async compute capabilities and well they dont..when a proper vr bench (is that even possible to do ? i dont know)comes this will be another fiasco for them
>>55215233
>all these retards falling for this bait
Come on guys, do you seriously believe this fucki.... Oh wait
>>55219261
well people that tested the card with the 5.2 driver said it was unstable as shit
OoO wasnt working
the discard acc wasnt working
literally the card was held back its safe to say that 99% of the leaks so far doesnt give us the whole picture yet
>>55215233
Single slot = best slot
GG op
>>55219190
Picture is upside down my newfriend
http://www.pcgamer.com/why-nvidias-gtx-970-slows-down-using-more-than-35gb-vram/
If the 980 has full 4GB, why does it experience huge performance drops just like the 970 when going over 3.5?
>>55215330
>>55215233
>>55215278
Fucking kill yourself. You must be literally the dumbest person on this board.
>>55219174
Crossfire doesn't work like that, dumbass. The VRAM isn't shared between the cards.
>>55219420
wat now? since when shared memory has anything to do with the protocol?
the problem was with dx11 that couldnt use the memory on a cf/sli setup..
on dx12 you dont have that problem the cards act like a shared memory pool
>>55219400
Why are you so rude?
>>55215233
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bm5ZCJah-FY
>bought a 970
>cuck'd by nvidia "hyper setting"
Enjoy your powerpoint
>All Aus photos are upsidedown, just like the country
>>55215315
>
fucking lost it aha
>>55219689
I don't get it?
It is a 4GB cardz. Or is it physically missing vram?
>>55218780
This is exactly what cucked means.
>>55219767
Have memes gone too far?
>>55218453
who fucking cares about that shit
amd has the same thing called raptr
>>55215415
>He said he'd get me
Is he your boyfriend?
>>55219799
i wouldnt even compare it... raptr is good to buy points for games but thats it whoever made that record program needs to be shot in the head with with a dick from a drag queen full of aids cancer and holy water
>>55219391
because it doesn't.
the 980 is a full uncucked 4gb
>>55219672
so they are almost equal the entire time.
how is that bad?
>>55219836
not being able to hit 20 fps while the other one hits constant 40-50 on the hyper is the same?
no wonder how nvidia gets followers
Is there where i post my shitty computer?
>>55219887
>>>/wg/ you stupid weaboo
>>55219887
i would go and say it was an ok till i saw the avast tile..
>>55219887
your desktop makes me wanna kill myself
>>55218458
The RX 480 outperforms a GTX 980 in Directx 11 and a beats a GTX 980TI in Directx 12, and that's at stock clocks.
Once you OC it to 1500 MHz it's almost on par with a GTX 1070 in Directx 11 and outperforms it in Directx 12.
Nvidia got BTFO with this GPU.
>>55215245
Noyce tbfam
>>55220087
we dont know anything amd said reviewers will get their drivers (1.6.6.3) one day before the release
so far what we have seen is really the card being running on a driver that doesnt support most of the stuff it has
(the only CONFIRMED person we know is dg lee that livestreamed his while showing the new oc tool of amd the card reached 1607mhz)
>>55219735
It's a 3.5gb card.
lurk more
>>55218189
If you launch a title that shows you memory use, like GTA V, GTA IV, Rainbow Six Siege, you will see your VRAM use is waaaaay less than 3.5gb.
On 1080p.
> inb4 you want 4K with a 970
Nigga please.
>>55220110
>we dont know anything amd said reviewers will get their drivers (1.6.6.3) one day before the release
PCGames Hardware said they got a driver for the RX 480 from AMD the day before yesterday.
>(the only CONFIRMED person we know is dg lee that livestreamed his while showing the new oc tool of amd the card reached 1607mhz)
And that's with the shitty reference cooler. AIB cards will easily achieve 1500 MHz clock rates and make pretty much any card from the 980 TI on down obsolete.
>>55220087
It can even be overclocked higher than a 1080!
>>55220208
I know.
>>55220117
So you're saying the card ships with 0.5gb soldered off?
Best thread.
Why does Intel name all its processors after white people suburban neighborhoods?
>>55220087
I will be needing some links or screenshots to back this up or its all billy bullshit
>>55220549
It's just AMD shills going full force.
>>55220575
I know but I like to toy.
Oh look at these Euro prices on the 480s why shockingly theyre more than expected.
You should've told them you represent a tech blog so that they send you the high performance version.
>>55220125
>waaaaay less than 3.5gb.
Maybe if you turn off the advance settings.
https://youtu.be/53SSulOwPwk?t=49s
>>55220586
It's shocking how they mislead, comparing msrp rx480 prices with inflated amazon gtx1070 prices.
>>55219359
That isn't a single slot card.
>>55215233
why?
>>55219887
I have the same but the msi gtx 750
>>55220487
What?
Since all the gpu memers are in here I might as well ask:
Is it possible to have MSI Afterburner's graph, not just the numerical stats, as a transparent overlay instead of that detached windowed always on top shit?
>>55215539
>spending $150 more on a worse card
At least get a 1070
>>55215753
>I had to dig and dig and dig for the best benchmark to support my meme claim
Gee I wonder if you'll post a AoTS benchmark too.
>>55220644
Yes.
>>55220650
Can you tell me how I can achieve that?
>>55220663
Yes.
>>55215233
Reported, dildos aren't technology.
>>55215566
Supply and demand; better products get more demand, more demand increases price.
Can't believe it has to be spelled out for you.
>>55218201
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VsaSdTMv7ms
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i9ZG7pA5INc
>>55220663
double click the graph
