Why is OSX so pleasent to look at when compared to Linux and Windows?
>>55207707
go away tripfag cancer
>>55207668
it's because the company's major function is designing.
>>55207707
What's worse?
>>55207738
>it's because the company's major function is designing.
Right.
>>55207668
Because I can actually change the way Linux looks.
It looks like a price of shit. Icons look something like fisher price. Dock and taskbar take half the screen
>>55207738
>Major function
Make usability the major function. Apple is retarded
>>55207806
>Apple is retarded
elaborate.
>>55207668
>pleasent to look at
>kids drawing
its shit
>>55207806
well, it seems you don't know what design means. functionality comes first with design.
>>55207668
os x made its ui worse yet it's still better than all the alternatives
I like mine.
>posting in desktop thread.
Hello panjeet
>>55207668
because you have shit taste
I always thought windows 7 looked really nice, but I guess windows 10 looks even nicer.
Nevertheless, I don't use an operating system because it is "pleasant to look at", that's what desktop environments are for. I use GNU+Linux
>>55207668
Cause Fags make it instead of neck beards
The DE doesn't respect screen real estate with the dock. XFCE with whisker menu instead of dock, or Cinnamon is way better.
>>55207668
10.9 was a lot more pleasant to look at too be honest
>>55207668
Because at Apple people who care about design and are good at it have actually something to say. At Apple design is actually more or less the center of their work and everything else kind of builds around it.
Their competitors (Microsoft, Google, Freetards) on the other hand don't take it seriously at all (Microsoft treats it like a nuisance, Google like a hobby, Freetards don't even have even somewhat professional designers working for them).
Solaris looks far far better op
t. computer operator
>>55207668
It's a bit old hat now isn't it. It's nice but a tad tired
>>55207668
Everything is so fucking grey
>>55209733
Only if you have autism.
It may be nice to look at for you. Apple spends a lot to make its brand seem more premium and elegant and special, so that you are ready to spend more on their products.
>>55210599
What are you trying to say?
>>55210618
It's not that they are objectively better. If you find a person who has never come in contact with the marketing of the brand in the least, would be indifferent.
There have been tests on how people perceive apple, and unlike a lot of other brands, areas in the brain were activated that were connected to "liking people". They sponsor people a lot of people might like with their devices and then people connect apple to them in a way as well, and they end up connecting the whole user experience with that with time as well. Of course, there are also other aspects like their brand positioning etc.
>>55207668
Yet another reason to purchase the new Apple MacBook Pro with Retina Display.
>>55207668
I hate the colors on Mac OSX >10.9. Not sure why. Something about the gradients or the saturation or something. I mean, look at that Safari icon. It looks awful.
That being said 10.6 is still one of the greatest looking operating systems IMHO.
>>55211599
>glossy dock
>>55211657
You hate it now, but you know you loved it back then.
>>55211657
>dock
Say what you want about OSX I still haven't found a good replacement for the 12 GB Garageband Essentials. The default sounds and drumsets are high quality as fuck. Legit best I've used ootb
If you faggots wanna prove me wrong please do
>>55211751
Poo in the fucking loo Raj.
>>55207668
i dont think so
ive always hated the menu at the bottom
>>55207668
Osx looks terrible mate.
>>55207668
>OSX
>>55207668
>Why is OSX so pleasent to look at when compared to Linux and Windows?
For the same reason men are more pleasing to look at than women. Your gay.
>>55207668
Because that's its main feature. The idea of Apple products is that they're pretty, and simple. Much like that which their users strive to be.
>>55207668
because it was designed by professional industrial designers, not software engineers in power point, or neckbeards by the seat of their pants
Wincucks and Freetards absolutely swarmed this thread
>>55214304
2 rupees have been deposited in your loo Pajeet!
>>55207668
GNOME Shell and OSX are the only desktop environments that are pleasant to look at.
>>55207668
Gradients up the ass coupled with as much of the color white and round edges as humanly possible
Gahnoo/Loonix is done by autists who think they can into design but can't.
Microsoft just doesn't care.
>>55215104
gnome shell looks like it's trapped in 2006
Gee! New/Linux is so much comfier.
>>55215582
That looks like shit
-shit font rendering (you're also using two different fonts in your terminal, like a tard)
-shit colors and boring palette
-shit window decorations
-shit OS
>mfw you thought it looked good
>>55215582
Eugh
>>55215582
proof that linux tards have no sense of good design
>>55215582
nice theme, i never figured out how to get openbox working. back when i used #! it was a really nice setup along with tint2. is there a starter guide for this?
>>55207668
Because of simple design, rounded icons, and relaxing backgrounds. It's not exactly rocket science.
>>55208126
Stupid pedophile.
>>55215104
Gnome is actually decent out of the box. I don't know why do people hate on it. I used to use it exclusively before I got OS X.
>>55218541
Guess it's not "minimalistic" or lightweight enough.
Probably just old. And old things are bad.
>>55207764
Hardware team is fucking retarded (see: no headphone jack on iPhone 7), but the software team has a good head on their shoulders.
>>55208179
kek'd hard, I can see your pic related being used to max potential on /g/
also silicon valley is p gud tbqfh famalam
Drop OSX and give iOS a desktop mode, along with any necessary compatibility layers for legacy apps.
>>55208179
kek I love you for making the webm. The first thing I thought as soon as I watched the episode.
THANK YOU ANONS.
>>55208179
What's this from
>>55219091
Apple's new HQ.
