What's your excuse for not using pale moon over firefox?
Also, pale moon thread.
>>55192282
probably malware/botnet.
>>55192282
>the palememe
>not vivaldi
>>55192300
It's clean and under the same free license as firefox is, MPL 2.0
>>55192282
Because it's outdated garbage, based on a three year old version of Firefox with security patches botched onto it by a Dutch furry and lacking support for basic modern web features like Media Source Extensions. Even he recently admitted that the whole thing is a burning tyre fire and needs to be scrapped and started over from scratch.
>>55192315
Building from source is too complicated, and I won't trust this guy's binaries. I'll just stick to FF.
>Using outdated, obsolete Firefox 24.0 codebase
TOPPEST LELKEK
>>55192309
Isn't that browser still mostly proprietary?
>>55192332
Considering they've added nothing but garbage since, I don't see the flaw here
>>55192327
But you're gonna trust a hundred people with a SJW agenda
>>55192282
>furrymoon
slow, broken, developed and used exclusively by tech illiterate autists
>>55192282
I don't use either
>>55192309
>using a Chromium web app as a browser
>>55193132
Spotted the Facebook user posting from Chrome.
>>55193373
spotted the social outcast who pretends to be interested in tech but doesn't know anything about it
Because it's convenient having my bookmarks synced with Firefox/Waterfox.
>>55192323
It supports MSE
>>55192282
Isn't that the one made by a fucking furry?
>>55192282
compatabilty is kind of meh
youtube works shitty in it
other than that nothing. currently using waterfox for power browsing, and iridium for opening links
Developer is a furry
>>55192323
Proofs, tovarisch?
>>55192282
I use pale-moon but it pisses me off I can't use youtube properly
>>55193425
source? because as far as I know it fucking doesn't
>>55192282
I don't, no excuses needed
>>55193677
Interested in Iridium atm, would recommend?
>>55194048
Sure, its really fast on load, everything works compatibility wise. The least botnet chrom* based browser as far as I'm concerned.
Added flash and made portable as well,
iridium.exe -user-data-dir="*path to*\profile" -ppapi-flash-path="*path to*\pepflashplayer.dll" -allow-outdated-plugins
only reason I'm using waterfox as well is cause I really need load on demand and tab groups, just how I browse.
Iridium opens in a second, though, I think eats more ram initially.
>>55192323
>hurrr pale moon is just old firefox with security fixes nothing else!!!!
yeah ok. check for yourself on firefox 24 esr. they are different.
also, pale moon is going to be rebased off a newer version soon, with MSE support.
>>55192309
I installed Vivaldi a week ago and never succeeded makign Flash player in porn websites and other stuff work, so I gave up.
>>55194148
when
>>55194312
whenever tycho finishes it
you can use firefox if you really want 60 fps youtube that bad. twitter videos not working is annoying however (though that's more twitter's fault serving borderline corrupted media files)
>>55192282
How does the Palemoon browser differ from vanilla firefox besides changing the theme? Does it strip out integration for bloatware and DRM shit, like Pocket and EME? I'm in the market for a trimmed down, possibly privacy enhanced firefox fork with reasonably fast security updates. I am most in hate with things like google analytics.
>>55194148
really looking forward to new pale moon, waterfox is cool, but Ill feel at home with pale moon
I use palemoon with noscript because I like my browser fast and secure
>>55194377
EME is not and will never be included in Pale Moon. Pocket and other bloat features like telemetry/mozilla crash reporter are nonexistent.
You can read more about what's included/disabled here
palemoon.org/technical.shtml
Also, Pale Moon just got a security update yesterday, so it is still actively maintained.
>>55194139
Nice answer Anon thanks
>>55194439
what about waterfox?
>>55194413
I use pale moon, but it's not fast anon, don't kid yourself
>>55194439
I notice Canvas support is lauded. No efforts have been made to integrate fingerprinting resistance into the browser?
>>55194342
meh I currently use this picrelated floating youtube addon for chrome, it kind of werks and is pretty useful in a lot of situations, but it requires me to have chrome installed
>>55192332
Version numbers are memous now.
How long ago was it?
>>55194534
Does it support webp?
>>55192282
because I use this garbage.
>>55192282
Palemoon is smalltime. A fork by one man.. I don't trust that to be my browser
Same reason I only use Debian for a distro
Icecat is firefox without the bullshit
>>55194494
pale moon may be slow but if you block 90% of scripts is fast as hell
>>55194604
how did you delete your post mang
>>55194560
It does support static webp. Not animated webp.
It's a meme anyway though.
>>55192282
didn't you hear? we Firefox ESR now
>>55194604
It's on github. There isn't just one person developing it.
If it bothers you that one guy primarily works on it, maybe you should learn programming and help.
>you can't
>>55192897
Better the devil you know fagget
>>55192282
Since FF43 I cant disable plugin-container anymore, meaning Youtube is slow as a bitch and also I notice a few playback bugs.
Can I still disable it in Pale Moon? The pref is ipc.enabled something.
>>55194605
Icecat's anus is currently wide open with the end of support for ESR 38. If they don't move to 45+, they have to become a proper fork or give up. No comment yet.
>>55194619
So is fucking firefox
>>55192282
What's your excuse for caring about what software other people use?
I fucking hate 4chins. Everyone is so delusional that they have to create a reason for why they are superior to everyone else. I don't give a shit about what software other people use because it's not my machine. Fuckin' neets
>>55194695
I bet you use Winblows/a distro with prebuilt binaries too.
>>55194667
>maybe you should learn programming
>>55194714
why arent they moving to esr45, do they make their own patches then?
>>55194727
specifically, learn to program in C++
>>55194725
Yes and?
>>55194753
You trust that?
I have a 32 bit computer and it can't use firefox themes
>>55194787
Why not? They're well run public companies and not some shady fly by night faggot with an agenda.
>>55194743
They haven't said if they are or aren't. A week now, and no comment. torbrowser has already moved to esr45, but I don't wanna use tor. I want a de-AIDSed firefox with fingerprint resistance and support for my favorite extensions.
>>55192282
well internet explorer was already installed i guess. So why not just stick to that?
>>55194812
So you think Microsoft/Canonical/Red Hat etc don't have agendas?
What agenda would a Dutch furry programmer have?
Lastly, where's the proof Pale Moon is malicious software to begin with? Oh right, you're a lazy paranoid fuck who can't use virustotal to scan the binaries or build the source.
>>55194723
Or maybe people care about other people just a little, and when you find a good thing you want to share it and make people use it cause its good and they might not know it\be deluded by memes about it.
>>55194439
Newsflash.. EME will be available in the Pale Moon next generation browser.
The only reason it does not exist in the version 24 based one is that they can not find a way to implement it.
They have hidden their incompetence behind some sugar coat and called it moral decision.
>>55194842
They do, their agenda is profit.
>what agenda would a Dutch furry programmer have?
Who the fuck knows?
Microsoft releases quarterly reports on their 'agenda'
What the fuck does Dutch furry do everyday?
>>55194876
says the expert with no successful port of firefox
>>55194439
Their new re-base will be Firefox mid 30's code base. So it will have all the basic features of what that version had. They only remove Australis and the bloat with ripping out the Australis content folder and implementing their old UI folder and fixing the bugs which are upcoming because of that.
>>55194876
Incredible source you have there.
>>55194895
I am no expert, and compared with Moonchild i am a loser for sure.
But still, if you hide the inability to do some stuff behind some nice words because you do not want to make other users switch away from your lesser optimized product is still a simple lie, even if it would be one with a cherry on the top.
>>55194887
fap to furry
just like me
>>55194930
Your source is here asshole!
http://forum.palemoon.org/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=12216&p=86032&hilit=eme#p86032
>>55192282
Chromium
>>55194942
Good for you, I'm a loli man myself
>>55192282
No Https Everywhere
>>55194930
It was a 180 degree turn from "What the hell, it is disgusting" towards "Majority of sites demand that, we have no other choice".
If Moonchild would have some real guts, Eme/Mse would still be missing in the re-base.
>>55194952
>>55194981
EME/MSE comes with rebasing to the newer version of Firefox. Moonchild would have to go out of his way to disable it. Obviously this isn't the best interest for a browser that wants to remain compatible with the web and compete with say, Firefox or Chrome.
Maybe you should direct your discontent towards the companies that use DRM video in the first place. Or just avoid those sites altogether. Just a thought.
>>55194955
never got the appeal
Firefox 38.0-ESR is better.
>>55194966
>https://addons.palemoon.org/extensions/privacy-and-security/encrypted-web/
>>55194966
yea there is.
>>55195064
Pale Moon is no mass market product, if you serve a niche market you can do something what others can't do. Well, Moonchild has in the end less courage instead of what i wished he would have.
>>55194955
>>55195070
You dialogue was very interesting.
In the end you're both degenerates.
>>55195064
Also, DRM affects music, video... Think i through, how long it will be before it will also affect plain and simple webpages or just pure content.
The times where stuff was allowed to be free or stuff was allowed to be shared as free will die soon. Forced onto us by the hands of large companies.
>>55195115
yes, and?
>>55195128
EME is going to be used to plaster unblockable (as in you block the ad, you block the content as well) ads over websites, I'm calling it.
Everyone cheered for flash to die and everyone moving to HTML5 thinking it would be great. Instead, companies made their DRM a "web standard" and forced browsers to implement them to stay current. This is what you get.
>>55192282
No Greasemonkey
>>55195175
it has greasemonkey
>>55194853
If that was the case they people would post something like "Hey guys, check this shit out!" instead of "What's your excuse for not using this?"
>>55194853
He's new and not used to the customary obnoxiousness of OPs.
>>55195203
you're not too far gone yet. leave while you still have the memory of the world.
Everyone cheered when Google Chrome came out. The next greatest browser. And after enough marketing, eventually, Google overcame Firefox in marketshare. Google is now using this opportunity to shape the web how they want, because everyone uses their browser and has no choice. Effectively, a modern day IE.
All of you asked for this.
>>55195263
eh. ill just quit internet if shit gets too rough.
It doesn't matter what browser you use. Why? Websites follow the leader. How it looks and functions in Chrome is the gold standard.
Even if the site is fine now, it will get updated when some web developer pajeet wants to justify his paycheck with a "redesign".
As long as Google dominates the market, your browser must comply or remain outdated forever. As long as big for-profit companies can persuade the W3C to make things standard, there's really no hope for web browsers.
>>55192282
I am not a furry or furry supporter
Because I use Chrome, an actually good browser.
>>55195690
sjw detected
Compatibility issues with tree style tabs.
>>55195297
You won't. And you know it.
>>55195171
Explain please, I'm dumb.
Who else here using Cyberfox?
