Has anyone investigated how much hotter a processor runs when using the integrated graphics?
>>55187728
I can investigate, how do you suggest I proceed?
From experience it either stays the same or increases a couple of degrees. Talking about an hour or more of GTAV or CSGO. On a 6700k though.
When I was on a c2d it shot up anywhere between 10-20C (youtube, Return to the castle of wolfenstein, AoE3 etc.)
The GPU has a 2.5w tdp compared to the other 70w or whatever of the CPU.
>>55187728
10 to 15 degrees max
I own an APU and desu i am surprised on how cool it is, ~45C on idle, ~50C on light load, 62C on full load. Never been above 62C, no matter how long i run it.
I use the stock fan and heatsink
>>55188202
C2Ds didn't have on die graphics.
>>55188202
>it either stays the same or increases a couple of degrees
fucking amazing discovery right there, I TOUGHT IT WOULD RUN COOLER
>>55189558
As in it didn't increase much fuckface.
>>55191596
WHAT ARE THE CONSTRAINTS FOR A "COUPLE" OR "MUCH" YOU ILLITERATE CHIMP!
>>55187781
Run the computer purely on the integrated graphics, no external video card
Disable the integrated graphics (from bios), then run purely on the external video card
Post result?
Yes, about 15W TDP
Look at Xeons and then look at their respective i3/i5 variants
here are my results for my T42 with a dedicated 32mb graphics chip.
Playing OSRS on minimum graphics over 20 minutes.
Integrated only:
>running at about 73c
Dedicated with integrated on:
>running at 70c
Dedicated only:
>running at 68c
So I guess it's a few degrees cooler, however the dedicated gpu still gets hot as shit on its own and when used in tandem with integrated
And yes, I know the 1.3-1.7 pentium m's don't have integrated, but the 2.1ghz (785?) does