Girl coders
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /g/ - Technology
You are currently reading a thread in /g/ - Technology
Are you ready to be replaced, /g/?
Can you repeat the question?
What the fuck kind of name is Reshma Suajani
>>55163497
There's more of her
>>55163497
Do you have to ask?
>>55163472
No because women still ask me to help them get things
>>55163497
Indian probably
>Women are the real architects of society
>>55163472
San Marino has more cars per person than any other place in the world. Should we ship the entire auto industry to some shitty island off the coast of Italy?
>buying shoes and using whatsapp/facebook to gossip about them + other people's lives = meaningful technology usage
sure i can't wait to see the internet of the future as thought by our great, strong, independent womyn
If you are afraid that initiatives like this are going to create femcoders that will push any significant amount of mancoders out of the workforce, the you agree that many mancoders were given jobs based on gender stereotypes rather than just merit.
Don't think, silly boys ;)
>>55163567
The companies who collect SJW points rather than merit points deserve everything that's coming to them.
Ready
>>55163595
but they're going to come up with all these amazing ideas because of their varied perspectives and feelings. can't you see? it's 2016, come on
If I identify as a girl, will I get diversity points?
>>55163631
White males don't get to claim being transgender
>>55163579
are you the disinfo shill against males?
Over half of the population are males. You're not discriminating against males, are you?
>>55163472
>bitches only use the internet for online shopping and social media
>they believe that's all there is to the internet
>>55163642
Sorry meant for OP.
>we consume more therefore we should make and sell it too
No, women, that's not how it works
>>55163646
I mean, it's true, isn't it? Besides the creepy dudes living with their moms doing illegal stuff on mongolian cave painting forums, girls basically own the internet
/g/ will deny this
>>55163472
>Getting your jimmies rustled over shit idiots post on a social media website.
Stop being so sensitive.
Stop being so concerned with SJWs, "girl coders", and pajeets.
Git gud...at something.
Posts like these are almost as bad as the shilling threads.
>>55163507
>>55163543
>>55163620
>>55163640
I have lived to see Feminism become strictly a commodity. I've witnessed commercials sell female hygiene pads by appealing to >muh wagegap and "Girls stronk" mottos used to sell makeup.
We live in a comical world.
>>55163722
Who the flying fuck would deny that?
Why the shit do you need some fucking hashtag about you being a fucking WOMAN WHO CODES? That has nothing to do with your fucking profession and has everything to do with you being a vain piece of shit.
>>55163722
That's actually hilariously wrong
>>55163753
Given some of the code I've seen these women right, I can see why they believe it to be true. Their code reflects their irrationality.
>>55163722
>i feel right therefore I am right
>>55163722
what if one person taught the other to code
it would look very similar at least
>>55163749
Because we have to be proud and loud against the patriarchy.
>>55163811
Th.. those are things that literally everyone likes to do.
She's saying that all programmers are male neckbeard basement dwellers with no lives, and that somehow she's breaking some imaginary mold because she's a woman.
Jesus fucking Christ kill me.
>>55163811
I don't think the majority of "female koders" are this dumb
>>55163846
women who actually code do not use a hashtag called #IAmAGirlWhoCodes
Coding is logical, feminism is the opposite.
>>55163896
I've worked with women. Nobody made a big deal about it. As a matter of fact, nobody made a big deal about anyone unless you did something exceptionally great or extraordinarily stupid.
>>55163722
How is it called when you intentionally write a program more than once to try to cancel out any bugs for critical systems? I remember there being studies that showed people tend to converge to the same solutions (and the same bugs, sadly), but can't find them.
>>55163674
They consume; they do not own. And if consumption meant ownership, they would only own Facebook, Buzzfeed, Tumblr, and, maybe, Twitter.
>>55163910
that goes for either gender
>I'm a girl and I CODE
implying that I think girls can't code
that's very patronising to every woman, you should be ashamed of yourself
// hii this is my program!!! <3
vs
// this program was made by john doe
>>55163674
if you think facebook and online shopping are the internet, then yes. years ago i would have said you don't belong here by asking something this retarded, but these days i'm not so sure anymore about who belongs and who doesn't
>>55163899
Do women enjoy making themselves look exceedingly puerile? If I were a woman, I'd be fucking embarrassed to be seen at a feelings, vagina "coding" rally.
>women use social media
>men made it possible
Anyways, why are we taking these feel-good, pulled out of my ass numbers as facts ?
You could be doing something useful but you are shitposting on /g/.
How is that different from making memes at facebook instead of something that matters?
>>55163916
Redundant systems?
I think NASA do this with life critical systems - three different teams write their own functions, and the servers will process each; if two functions return the same answer, that's the answer choen
>>55163753
it depends on the scope of the problem. finding prime numbers between 1-100 will look similar. designing an OS will look different.
>We own the internet
Look at those cute little retards, confusing their obsessive consumerism with owning anything!
>>55163968
>calling anyone or group puerile
>posting not only on 4chan, but /g/
k
>>55164021
Nice meme faggot.
>>55163472
Women use social media and buy shit? Fuck a CS degree and math skills, blogging about shopping is way more impressive on a resume
>>55163992
Yeah, but the term I was looking for is N-version or multiversion programming. This is the article that tries to prove that the versions are usually not that independent: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?coll=GUIDE&dl=GUIDE&id=10688
>>55163988
this is my downtime
all work and no play~
>>55163472
Consumers generally don't build the things they consume.
This is why they're consumers.
What a stupid argument.
>>55163642
Slightly less than half are males, anon
>>55163811
>i dont code in my free time
>i literally dont enjoy this hobby
>>55163722
/g/ fights about both indent and naming style so I doubt they will deny it.
>>55163811
What do they mean by this ? That boys are actually living in a dark room and spend all their free times coding ?
That's misandry. Why should I be stereotyped like this ?
>girls who code
Does they made something already ? Can we have a look at their code and what they produced ?
>>55163472
Humans are not liquids. We do not take the shape of what we are put in. You can't magically undo millions years of evolution. Female programmers will take a long time to get """""""equal""""""".
I'd like to point out the increasingly popular use of the word "code" as a verb.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but a "coder" is analagous to an electrician, while a "programmer" is more like an electrical engineer.
>>55163579
>it's
FFFFFUUUUUUUUU
>women in programming
Top fucking kek son.
>>55163472
>Use social media more than men
>This means they own the Internet
Kekerino
>>55164242
>women
>adding unnecessary bullshit
organized
>men
>pure code
complicated for no reason
not doing yourselves any favours
>>55164242
This is fake. If you reply to it, you are as stupid as the person who posted it.
>>55164228
I've always seen them as synonyms. A programmer is one who writes computer programs. A coder is one who writes code - code that can mean structured data, computer programs or even encrypted messages. The only people who write this kind of code are programmers.
>>55164298
It seems complicated because of the magic number. But you really can't make that code significantly more readable without sacrificing efficiency.
>>55164299
How is it fake? It was posted on an instagram account of a real woman and it was meant completely seriously.
>>55163497
> Suajani
Eh, close enough
>>55163959
"Last summer" is not years ago
>>55163472
>implying the end user knows anything about what they actually want
retards like that should never be let anywhere near the development process
>85% of all consumer purchases are made by women
so feminism and other attempts to funnel money onto women are just to sell more useless shit
Girls purchase more cause they're at home spending hubby's paycheck, they're browsing 600% more social media cause they don't have real work to do
>>55164360
yeah sure
>>55164298
You don't understand what this does. This is actually the simplest level of complexity that is needed to solve this specific problem. I bet you that if KK was actually capable of solving the same problem (she can't do it), her function with comments would span 10 times those lines.
>>55164330
>How is it fake? It was posted on an instagram account of a real woman and it was meant completely seriously.
it was not retard. Do you really think Karlie Kloss that can barely code would ever hear about this piece of code ?
>>55163472
Really makes me think...
>>55163811
all of my rage, all of it. It doesn't work like that.
>>55164298
That first snippet of code is the most ingenious single piece of code written in recent history. It approximates the inverse square root insanely fast, which is used in pretty much anything that has to render to a screen in 3d space.
Carmack himself added a comment stating //what the fuck
to it
>>55164498
I remember seeing that
>>55163722
I won't deny it, I've outright been taught it by a professor. He makes his students work on the same project every year, and every student's work looks a bit different in how they structure it. if it looks remotely like that of another student's (even like that of a previous student's), it is obvious that they copied.
>>55164511
which of course that stupid cunt cut out to be sanitized and safe
>>55163472
>that quote
OK now show me good things created by women
>>55163811
>>55164142
how can you get good at coding without putting the time in?
>>55163579
>it's
>>55163838
>dance, paint and hang out with my friends
>Th.. those are things that literally everyone likes to do.
WHERE THE FUCK DO YOU THINK YOU ARE YOU FUCKING NORMIE?
>>55164088
>people who make money from designing things don't spend that money
wew lads
>>55164588
Are you fucking stupid?
>>55164242
It's not real.
Also,
>yfw it returns 5 whenever the integers are equal
My experience so far with women and IT jobs:
>Women often occupy support roles, like secretary
>Women usually learn the minimum amount necessary about the technology involved to do their job
>Female students tend not to gravitate towards programming or electronics classes, usually about 85% are male
>Women take less of an interest in technology outside of their jobs
There's nothing inherently "wrong" with this, as women have fulfilled different roles in our evolutionary history for tens of thousands of years.
The general lack of women in technology jobs is due to multiple factors, some which I believe are social, and others biological.
>>55164523
>>55164330
>>55164242
>>55164449
it's a satire image you fucking retards
https://twitter.com/karliekloss/status/697837478141632512
Holy shit, /g/ is filled with retards. I bet you morons take every infograph you see on >>>/pol/ at face value, too.
>>55164298
Karlie's attempt at a max function is incorrect, because for max(6, 6), it returns 5, which is incorrect. The following would have been correct:int max(int a, int b)
{
if (a < b) {
return b;
}
else {
return a;
}
}
(and yes, there are many other ways to write that that are less verbose).
Meanwhile, the Q_rsqrt function was as simple as it could be
>>55164742
You've outed me
I can't code
well, I dabbled in ActionScript back in the day
>>55163472
that kind of shit only makes woman that are in the industry (and worked to get there) look bad
fucking millennials bitches...
>>55163472
By SJW feminazis with an inferiority complex? Not fucking likely.
Giving validation to someone that showed minimal effort is going to hurt that person in the long run.
It's bad for the individual to and it help with feeding their own delusion.
Being a software engineer takes a lot of discipline and effort.
It's hurtful to them and to software industry since it has been struggling with lack of professionalism for few decades.
>>55164724
You can post two things in one minute.
IIRC, she pulled the tweet because someone BTFO the code on the right, so she got dogpiled by people telling her to git gud.
>>55164768
C'mon man, even an idiot could have recognized that the max function was wrong. "Return 5 because lol random." Take your choice of profession a little seriously, will ya!
>>55163472
This image just made me realize why the internet sucks dick compared to when I first started using it. Stupid fucking cunts can only consume (speaking generally here).
>>55165152
Look at the number of retweets and likes retard, almost identical
Ffucking delusional are you? How stupid do you think /g/ is? Why are you even damage controlling this?
http://backtweets.com/search/?q=%40karliekloss+difference+between
>>55165379
How fucking delusional are you*
>>55163507
The cult of kindness.
kind of reminds me of this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WLZfWKQdOQg
>>55164588
The people designing thing are men, not women.
Everyone has 24 hours in a day. If you're spending 600% more of that browsing social media, you sure as hell aren't designing anything.
>>55164178
>misandry
>>55164549
Code monkeys don't git gud, they get Google.
>>55165621
>he says, as he replies to an off-topic political thread on an anime imageboard
>>55165746
4chan is known anti-social media. SO it doesn't count
>>55165766
>my hugbox isn't like the other hugboxes!
>i'm a special snowflake
>>55163472
How did this happen
>>55163916
Convergent design?
See: B-1 and Tu-160, or pretty much anything designed towards similar goals.
>>55164724
She's a fake.
https://www.instagram.com/p/sI70T1ESlP/
94 weeks old, "learning ruby"
https://www.instagram.com/p/BDD6g1OkSlm/
13 weeks old, "Intro to ruby development"
>>55165819
its common sense isnt it.
men make money and women spend it.
>>55165854
so why not point that out instead of posting blatantly fake images and presenting them as fact? It's also possible that "intro to ruby development" is a document she's authoring, btw.
Don't let facts get in the way of your circlejerk, though.
>>55163472
because they are easily duped, they should dupe other women?
keke ok pham. no wonder these companies are pushing the radical feminist agenda, economy would crash otherwise.
I fucking HATE the fucks in computer science / software development nowadays that hate programming. You know those types:
>I'm only doing this for the money bro
>I hate programming...ugh I just use stack overflow for everything
>>55163977
Came here to say this, literally where the fuck did she get those statistics.
>>55164436
rekt
God, if I were a woman this kind of shit would drive me away from the field faster then any sexism they claim exists
>>55163553
La serenissima is inland
Oh no! All the front end web dev jobs will be gone!!!!
>>55163543
Thats why its going to shit
>>55166307
I never thought about it that way. It's not like these cunts are much worse, and maybe the code will improve since it obviously can't go any lower
>girlswhocode
>I can do more than the bare minimum with a computer and have a vagina, let's celebrate
Is this just some meme?
>>55163472
>being a serial shopper and compulsive gossip somehow means you should be running something
Wait, I spoke too quickly. There is something you should be running. It's pic related.
>>55166378
>since it obviously can't go any lower
HAHAHA You have not read enough JS memecode, have you.
>>55164742
your code is incorrect because it returns "b" instead of "5"
Who is going to save us?
Thorium is a meme and not here anytime soon, people are stupid and don't want uranium, solar panels are still shit, and fusion is forever 20 years away.
>>55163472
>85% of consumer purchases are made by women
Yeah, by using money men made :^)
>>55163528
>not using css for styling
>>55165819
because women are fucking stupid and fall for all the marketing scams?
>>55163472
Look at all those squares in the comments
Time to upgrade to a modern OS, OP.
>>55166967
typical zshkiddies
>>55163472
>Women use social media at a rate of 600% more than men
I bet this did not count 4chan, IRC, and message boards.
>>55163791
>Given some of the code I've seen these women right
>right
>>55163507
>With programming it's always a hit-or-miss
what
>>55167201
I bet this counted one chick going on Facebook 6 times in an hour vs a dude checking his messages once
>>55169044
that quality doesnt matter to them.
barely working is just as good as working well.
>>55167201
does it count all the instasloots i follow?
don't comment though, those are the worst instastalkers, cringy as fugg
>85% of all consumer purchases are made my women
>Women use social media at a rate of 600% mor e than men
>We own the Internet
>We should be building the companies of tomorrow
All based on the fact that women use Facebook/Twitter/LinkedIn/9gag, and nothing else. Social Media! Fucking entitled twat.
>>55163472
>Are you ready to be replaced, /g/?
I'm already transitioning into a little girl
I've been dressing up as a girl when programming for years.
I'm ready for the future
>>55163640
>American-Muslim
the bandwagon is real
>>55163472
Sure, and in the US, women are required to register for selective service at the age of 18, and can now be drafted in time of war. You wanted equality...
... be careful what you wish for.
>>55163811
and they they>import library_a_Sweaty_dingy_CIS_MALE_who_sits_in_a_dark_room_all_day
and get hailed as brave heros for making a crappy app that doesn't implement classes correctly
>>55169580
You do know she's not here, right?
>>55163472
>implying i code for money
I will never be replaced.
>>55163722
I think I would deny the "none" part of that.
There are many parts to coding, if you are going to be outputting something then it is quite possible that your code for it will look the same.
If it requires a loop then it is quite likely the loop will look the same.
If it is taking input from the user then that will likely look similar, if not the same (maybe different variable names).
Sure, if you said take a GPS region with NW and SE points and expand the region by 5% then the resulting code would likely be very different between different people, but there are also going to be many cases where the are portions of code that are nearly identical, so the usage of the word "none" is complete bullshit.
>>55163674
90% of people worked on farms in middle ages Europe.
Therefore, the surfs owned the lands and had the power. Not the kings.
>>55163543
Thanks for ruining society, women.
>>55163472
>85% of purchases
Presumably made with either their family's money or spouse's (i.e. husband's) money. Generally being easy marks for emotionally-manipulative advertising, and easily being made to believe that their lives suck without a constant stream of new baubles only adds to it.
>600% more social media use than men
So they sit on social media all goddamn day, which is mostly complaining about something that offended them, bitching about people they know, and being vain and self-centered with constant pictures and updates about everything they say and do, to try and make their basic lives seem more interesting than they are.
>>55163472
>Women are actually proud of not being able to control their purchasing impulses
>>55170017
>Presumably made with either their family's money or spouse's (i.e. husband's) money.
come on anon.
>>55163472
So women are the main supporters of capitalism and mass surveillance?
>>55170037
There are a lot of women who like to shop but have no money. Same with men who like to gamble.
>>55163472
>we are frantic, thoughtless and hysterical consumers
>that means we should be producers too
>>55170101
plain ignoring women with jobs in your post was what i was pointing out.
both don't have numbers, but i think it is a safe bet to say they are making their own money too, not everyone is rich or has the luxury of being able to live off just one paycheck.
so from what i can gather, literally the only thing she "creates" are retarded ass 9-picture collages
>>55163472
Jokes on you, they all still really suck. They only handle the most basic of things.
