What is your estimate for the emergence of artificial general intelligence (AGI)?
I say 2035
I imagine the recent breakthroughs by that University in Spain together with Google, in quantum computers, will have something to do with it. Quantum computers will become really good at powering deep learning by cca 2025
There will be improvements in algorithms by DeepMind, as they are making quasi-general intelligence that plays different video games without any foreknowledge of the game
What's your estimate?
Hopefully never, AI is heresy, it will be the end of Mankind as we know it.
>>55153603
We already employ AIs
Sentient AIs won't be a thing for a long time though because we don't know how consciousness works
>>55153641
>we don't know how consciousness works so we can't create it
>if people don't know chemistry the can't cook
>>55153423
at the rate which improvements happen??
2025-33 at the latest
so everybody prepare your anus for futa skynet
Weakly general AI already exists (see deepmind papers), but in 10~20 years it will become much more useful and ubiquitous.
See
https://deepmind.com/blog
https://deepmind.com/publications.html
>tfw deepmind gives cutting edge AI research papers away for free
>plebes don't even try to read them
plz answer
>I imagine the recent breakthroughs by that University in Spain together with Google, in quantum computers, will have something to do with it.
nah they don't
>>55155458
im ready
>>55153423
Nah the statistical models employed by deepmind and google are not the same as the AI you're describing, the intelligence is baked in, they're not tactile and flexible like the semantic networks within the brain.
Take the go bot google made a while back, they fed thousand and thousands of games into it before it was good. More games than could ever be played by a human yet a human was still able to beat it (once).
The human brain is just too complex you can't even fathom it, literally because it's your own brain lol.
Also there is a lot of misinformation about quantum computing and it's links to AI. There is new research indicating that the brain actually takes advantage of quantum effects during computation. But that's sort of unrelated to the main challenge which is the unfeasible amount of nodes required to do a good sim.
The year 3000
>>55156605
>Nah the statistical models employed by deepmind and google are not the same as the AI you're describing, the intelligence is baked in, they're not tactile and flexible like the semantic networks within the brain.
>The human brain is just too complex you can't even fathom it, literally because it's your own brain lol.
Brain is so mysterious xD
