ENJOY USING WINDOWS WITH THIS CONVENIENT "FLAW"!
Windows 'BadTunnel' Attack Hijacks Network Traffic
http://www.darkreading.com/vulnerabilities---threats/windows-badtunnel-attack-hijacks-network-traffic/d/d-id/1325875?_mc=RSS_DR_EDT
WINDOWS USERS BANKRUPT, DESTITUTE AND SUICIDAL.
Affects IE, Edge, and Office. So, I guess all of /g/ is vulnerable.
>>55112805
holy fuck this is amazing
>>55112898
>mfw i dont use any of those because i have no life
>>55112982
>I don't use microsoft products so that makes me a NEET
WEW look at you trying to earn GBP on /g/
>>55112805
C U C K E D
A G A I N
W I N C U C K S
I don't care as I do not use Windows or any Microsoft-related dung made by poojeets.
>>55112805
>already patched
ok kid
>>55113192
>>55113183
You understand that Microsoft is among the top contributors to the Linux Kernel, right?
>>55112805
Working overtime Pajeet?
>>55112805
>It basically works like this: the attacker gets a victim to visit a rigged web page via IE or Edge, or to open a rigged Office document (or install a malicious flash drive).
I'm safe then.
>>55113315
No its not?
>>55113315
Not according to this - http://www.linuxfoundation.org/news-media/announcements/2015/02/linux-foundation-releases-linux-development-report
Microsoft is in the top 20 at best.
>>55113315
>not using Mac OS
>>55113315
>Microsoft's 688 changes accounted for one percent of the total in the 2012 list
http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2013/09/google-and-samsung-soar-into-list-of-top-10-linux-contributors/
>>55113387
>http://www.linuxfoundation.org/news-media/announcements/2015/02/linux-foundation-releases-linux-development-report
>>55113389
>Top 20
Uh huh. I didn't say THE top, I said one of the top. Top 20 still applies.
>>55113395
Who said I don't?
>>55113432
Your data is a little old. About 4 years or so...
>>55113432
This is why I'm proud to buy Samsung and support Linux
>>55113471
>Uh huh. I didn't say THE top, I said one of the top. Top 20 still applies.
So you move the goalposts and now admit that they are not what any reasonable person would consider "top" to be, i.e. top 10, top 5, top 3 etc.? They ain't even in the top 10 contributors so I'd say they don't contribute enough to take your comment seriously.
>Your data is a little old. About 4 years or so...
I knew you would fall back on the 'age' argument. So, if you have a more up to date list of current contributions, I am waiting on you proving your statement. Otherwise, fuck off.
>>55113542
>So you move the goalposts and now admit that they are not what any reasonable person would consider "top" to be, i.e. top 10, top 5, top 3 etc.? They ain't even in the top 10 contributors so I'd say they don't contribute enough to take your comment seriously.
Reading comprehension escapes you, doesn't it? I didn't move shit.
For the 3.2 kernel, there were nearly 1300 devs, from ~225 companies. Top 20 still puts Microsoft as one of the top.
> I knew you would fall back on the 'age' argument.
Old data is old. And an updated list has already been provided in thread.
netbios has been a security issue for a while now, that and llmnr allows for capturing of domain credentials (which still require cracking of the hash).
businesses that value what they do have already disabled nbns and llmnr. my work shut down llmnr, however we had to leave netbios on because weve still got a bunch of older machines dating back to windows nt running plc equipment and cant be disabled.
>>55113630
>I didn't move shit.
Yes, you did. I am not going to argue past this post as you are clearly defective. Microsoft are not in the top 10 contributors, you have not supplied any evidence to support your spurious and vague claim other than (A VERY OLD) kernel.
Go on, have the last word, you poor excuse for abortion.
>>55113471
Oh nvm then. Greetings tovarisch
>>55112805
>Newly discovered -- and now patched
>and now patched
Tell me more.
>>55113679
>Microsoft are not in the top 10 contributors
He didn't say top 10 though.
