Just right now, there are users, who installed a server version

Thread replies: 6
Thread images: 1

Anonymous
2016-06-15 01:48:18 Post No. 55084318
[Report] Image search: [Google]

File: C__Data_Users_DefApps_AppData_INTERNETEXPLORER_Temp_Saved Images_iu.png (25 KB, 640x480) Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2016-06-15 01:48:18 Post No. 55084318 [Report]

Just right now, there are users, who installed a server version of Windows for their home PCs to use it daily.
Question: why did you do that? Why exactly Server?

>>

thinkfag (ID: !wB96XbH83U) 2016-06-15 01:55:07 Post No.55084414
[Report]

thinkfag (ID: !wB96XbH83U) 2016-06-15 01:55:07 Post No.55084414 [Report]

>less bloatware
>dual CPU support
>server/workstation motherboard

>>

Anonymous 2016-06-15 02:17:47 Post No.55084660
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-06-15 02:17:47 Post No.55084660 [Report]

Well, a few years back, there was the deal with Windows Home Server. I believe the licenses were going for like $39, and it would run everything the 'normal' versions of Windows would run. I might have bought it if I hadn't sworn off giving MS any of my money, ever.

>>

Anonymous 2016-06-15 05:45:49 Post No.55086868
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-06-15 05:45:49 Post No.55086868 [Report]

>>55084414
>>dual CPU support
NT has supported real SMP in non-server versions since the beginning, though.

And enterprise versions are pretty much bloatware-free as well.

>>

dhaush 2016-06-15 05:54:32 Post No.55086950
[Report]

dhaush 2016-06-15 05:54:32 Post No.55086950 [Report]

>>55084318

>>

Anonymous 2016-06-15 09:16:41 Post No.55088505
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-06-15 09:16:41 Post No.55088505 [Report]

>>55084318