Why does a shitty X201 sandy bridge integrated intel graphics chip perform 250% better than a T61 NVIDIA Quadro NVS140M in a T61, with both the nouveau and binary nvidia modules, dkms and standard? The X201 uses the i915 module.
http://www.notebookcheck.net/NVIDIA-Quadro-NVS-140M.4216.0.html
Old GPU from 2007 while Intel's GPU is 2011, not surprisingly newer tech is always faster
>>55076072
>http://www.notebookcheck.net/NVIDIA-Quadro-NVS-140M.4216.0.html
Yes it is 4 years older, but lets compare. A quadro from 2012 should perform better than a Haswell iGPU from 2016, right?
>>55076158
>>55076072
>>55076020
the quadro is really there for cuda and double float precision not for graphics...
>>55076158
Mobile quadro variants are weaker than you think
>>55077456
this
>>55077456
I remember seeing one-star reviews on Newegg for some quadros because "wtf my games aren't even working".
Can anyone explain CUDA cores briefly?
