[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
>RX480 has 980ti performance at 1400 MHz NVIDIA BTFO
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /g/ - Technology

Thread replies: 87
Thread images: 12
File: 1454039405929.png (49 KB, 808x805) Image search: [Google]
1454039405929.png
49 KB, 808x805
>RX480 has 980ti performance at 1400 MHz
NVIDIA BTFO
>>
>>55044056
source?
>>
Sauce?
>>
File: under.jpg (103 KB, 496x989) Image search: [Google]
under.jpg
103 KB, 496x989
>>55044077
>~1000 mhz 3200
>~1.266 mhz 3500
>~1400 mhz 3700
>>
File: 1451383104238.jpg (188 KB, 600x450) Image search: [Google]
1451383104238.jpg
188 KB, 600x450
I certainly hope you don't actualy believe this OP
>>
>>55044096
Some tests have shown that the RX 480 gets around 3500 points in fire strike ultra.
>>
File: 1465427165924.jpg (154 KB, 778x544) Image search: [Google]
1465427165924.jpg
154 KB, 778x544
>>55044118
>nvidiot in denial
>>
>>55044122
They are selling the card at 200 bucks, if it had 980ti performance do you think they would sell it for that price?
>>
>>55044120
At its base clock this is underclocked and it is still getting very good performance and with a mild overclock it can get 980 ti performance.
>>
File: 1310483412100.jpg (36 KB, 413x395) Image search: [Google]
1310483412100.jpg
36 KB, 413x395
>>55044145
yeah...no
>>
>>55044143
AMD are not a bunch of jews and want they want for the RX480 is as much market penetration as possible.
>>
>>55044143
They sure would if they want marketshare.
>>
>>55044096
I love this. When Nvidia was kicking ass in 3DMark and was comparable in real-life performance to AMD cards, AMD retards here were denying 3DMark results. Now that AMD is a bit better in 3DMark, it's the most reputable source of information for them.
>>
File: 1452799837787.png (650 KB, 512x800) Image search: [Google]
1452799837787.png
650 KB, 512x800
>>55044157
>nvidiot denying facts and solid proof
>>>/v/
Here is a echo chamber where you can take your shit opinions and be accepted by other retards.
>>
>>55044161
>>55044164
Fucking grow up, AMD isn't a charity instiution

They are a company in the business of making money for their shareholders.

If the 480 had anything close to 980ti it would not be sold for 200 bucks, period
>>
>>55044177
>shit that never happened
>>
>>55044193
I don't think you comprehend AMD's current situation, they're in no position to chase high margins, they're there to raise brand awareness and increase userbase else they're dead.
>>
>>55044193
>If the 480 had anything close to 980ti it would not be sold for 200 bucks, period

cool story armchair MBA,
>>
>>55044193
Fucking grow up, NVIDIA isn't a charity instiution

They are a company in the business of making money for their shareholders.

If the 1070 had anything close to Titan X it would not be sold for 380 bucks, period
>>
>>55044193
>Fucking grow up, AMD isn't a charity instiution, If the 480 had anything close to 980ti it would not be sold for 200 bucks, period
Is this how nvidiots justify how jewish nvidia's prices and tactics are?
>>
>>55044211
I perfectly understand their situation, with the 1070 being sold at 450 bucks, they could easily sell the 480 for 350 bucks and make a killing IF it actualy had 980ti performance.

I can't wait for the benchmarks to show you fanboys wrong
>>
>>55044214
the 1070 is $450
>>
>>55044096
And thats the 4GB version...
>>
File: 10489-img9219.jpg (69 KB, 500x399) Image search: [Google]
10489-img9219.jpg
69 KB, 500x399
>>55044193
Enjoy your buttmangling.
>>
>>55044056
>amd and overclocking
Remember the fury x?
>>
>>55044228
This isnt the first time AMD would have undercut nvidia like this just stop being so fucking new.
>>
>>55044231
Nvidia tells me it's $380
>>
>>55044244
Remember how you're underage? Fiji is the only chip from AMD that couldn't overclock for shit in the last half decade, Tahiti could do a 30% fucking OC
>>
>>55044234
Which means that the 8gb will be even better and the fully unlocked one even more so
>>
>>55044193
>>55044228
>make small, very high performance die
>get amazing yields
>sell it for cheap, vastly undercut your competition
>end up pushing them out of the market
Completely legitimate tactic, and with how small the Polaris die this is a high possibility.
>>
>>55044251
>Nvidia tells me
wew lad
>>
File: Raja-Koduri.jpg (111 KB, 1252x1002) Image search: [Google]
Raja-Koduri.jpg
111 KB, 1252x1002
>>55044161
They going to penetrate nvidias bum hole
>>
>>55044246
Keep dreaming buddy, the 480 will be 970/390 levels of performance, and that's what you guys have for the remainder of the year.

No 980ti performance
No vega in 2016

Just wait for the benchmarks to prove me right
>>
>>55044268
>you're underage
It tends to be underage people who resort to ad hominems
>>
>>55044298
see >>55044096
you are wrong now fuck off back to /v/ newfag
>>>/v/
>>
>>55044294
It's true, saw that Nvidia slide? It said $380
>>
>>55044193
You Apply for a job at Nvidia, you sound like exactly what they are looking for.
>>
>>55044315
Im sure you mean projection now get back to /v/ with the other newfags
>>>/v/
>>
>>55044315
Cute.
>>
File: xxxuez83[1].png (18 KB, 651x502) Image search: [Google]
xxxuez83[1].png
18 KB, 651x502
this is the 480 performance according to some other sources in germany and czech republic
>>
>>55044340
Lol what, that's just a graph with an arrow pointing towards the 980
>>
>>55044318
http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&IsNodeId=1&N=100007709%20601202919
they are all over $400 stop being a dumb goyim you fucking mongoloid
>>
>>55044340
I don't see 480 anywhere on that chart
>>
File: whatprice.png (342 KB, 1594x814) Image search: [Google]
whatprice.png
342 KB, 1594x814
>>55044251
Yea the told you $380
but that shit aint no $380
>>
>>55044360
>>55044365
But Nvidia said it was $380
>>
>>55044319
>amd is a charity company
You're really thick
>>
>>55044340
That was computex specutlation based on the doom benchmark they were showing off
>>
>>55044340
Im a AMD guy...why the fuck would you post this? You look like a retard.
>>
File: 1262163212155.jpg (11 KB, 220x168) Image search: [Google]
1262163212155.jpg
11 KB, 220x168
>>55044340
>>55044096
This is the level of evidence AMDrones find acceptable to substantiate their wishful thiking, hilarious
>>
>>55044359
>>55044364

its from ComputerBase, ofc they cant show it there due to NDAs or some shit so someone made/leaked this pic. Its 2 days old and its the same performance as this new leak
>>
>>55044371
Nvidia is a company that doesn't go a day with out lying about something
>>
So what do you think the 480's average power draw will actually be? 100-120W?
>>
>>55044397
>>>/v/
summerfags like you belong here
>>
>>55044426
>le ebic meme
Stay salty
>>
>>55044422
They already leaked like somewhere between 95-100 watts
>>
>>55044447
>>>/v/
You belong with your own kind
>>
>>55044422
I can assure you it will be slightly lower if you look at the Nano and new architecture gains + FinFETs
>>
It has been confirmed that RX480 will be 95W TDP card with performance a little under 980ti while it can still be overclocked by 80% - some leaks proved it to be 2500MHz stable clock on reference cooling. All of this for 199$ and with working DX12 support. Anyone who buy Nvidia this generation is blind fanboy.
>>
>>55044472
>>55044449
While low power draw and a small die doesn't equal a good overclocker, it's a good indicator at least.
Think it will be able to hit a 20-25% core OC? That will put it just slightly below the 1070 if it scales well.
>>
>>55044504
So is anybody who will buy a card based on rumors and hypetrain. Wait for proper reviews and benchmarks for it, then you are free to decide which is best for you.
>>
To be fair, if that's true, I'll be really happy. Not because i want an amd card, but simply because actual competition will force nvidia to lower it's prices.
>>
>>55044644
Everybody would be happy if that's true.

But it's wishful thinking, AMD is not about to sell a product that performs on par with what Nvidia has to offer for half the price.

And anyone thinking otherwise is a naieve idiot that will be asshurt when the benchmarks actualy come out.

That price is an excellent proxy of the kind of performance you can expect from it
>>
>>55044669
see
>>55044276
>>
>>55044693
The amount of graphics card sold isn't big enough to warrant such a strategy. That only works when you literally sell millions of a certain product
>>
>implying Nvidia will not reduce its GPU price once AMD releases its products

Happens every time. Nvidia comes sooner, milks early adapters then destroys AMD by lowering its price upon AMD GPU release.
>>
>>55044732
So AMD should stop being so fucking slow and release their cards on time. Then we wouldn't have this bullshit
>>
>>55044765
It should be similar to console release. For example Xbox and PS is released at approximately same time while they annouce its price and specs ahead. They are competing products so you can not afford releasing it 2-3 months later, because other company will steal your customers.
>>
>>55044056
DELETE THOSE CARDS
DESTROY ALL SCHEMATICS
SHUT DOWN ALL FACTORIES
ERASE THEM FROM EXISTENCE
BURN THEM ALL
>>
>>55044835
Releases happen at the same time when companies have products that can match each other, like is the case with consoles.

Amd doesn't have anything right now to match the 1070 or the 1080, so releasing them at the same time would have been a trainwreck.

Nvidia milking the market is a direct result of AMD's incompetence of producing competition in the high end segment in time
>>
>>55044295
Raj don't hurt them!
>>
>>55044295
DESIGNATED
>>
>>55044993
SHITTING
>>
>>55045013
GPUs
>>
>>55045013
GEFORCE
>>
>>55044211
>becoming a market leader by undercutting

This isn't the World of Warcraft auction house, bro. You can sell a product for a premium if it actually WERKS
>>
>>55045060
you cant sell shit if nobody knows or cares that you exist
>>
Why are you Nvidiots so angry at the prospect of cheap, powerful hardware?
>>
>>55045151
Not an nvidiot but if something's too good to be true it usually isn't
>>
I've been here since 2007 I have seen how lower quality the posts are while post rate keeps steadily increasing, this is truly the influence of /v/, you can't even talk about something or other without someone screaming memes constantly and/or/with full caps while good informative posts get ignored or trolled, lowest tier bait gets plenty of replies, probably no small amount of smallfagging to artificially increase (you)'s.

The worst ones affected are no doubt Nvidia users, from what I remember them, relatively decent, chill and inquisitive bunch who I was very glad to help on technical questions regarding hardware, with a few very smart minds to rabid dogs foaming at the mouth at every mention of their competitor.
>>
Built a desktop a month ago with a GTX 950.
Is it worth upgrading to a RX 480 when it's released? Or should I wait and see what the 1060/1050 has to offer?
>>
>>55045297
>upgrading to a RX 480
>upgrading
>>
>>55045342
An RX 480 is definitely an upgrade from a GTX 950 m8
>>
>>55044865

>Nvidia marks card up simply because they know people will fall for it i na niche market segment
>AMD is releasing a card in a segement where Nvidia has absolutely nothing and where the high volume sales are
>"fucking AMD for not competing - its all their fault!"

No, we should be asking where the fuck is the 1060 and why the fuck is Nvidia incapable of competing in that segment?
>>
>>55045216
This is hardly the first time AMD/ATi undercutted Nvidia, or even Intel heavily.
They can do this because P10 is a small chip, they won't sell at a loss.
>>
>>55045216

>never heard of the 4870
>>
>>55045447
Or the 5850.
>>
>>55044376
AMD actually is a charity company, Intel was court ordered to pay them money to keep them afloat.
Thread replies: 87
Thread images: 12

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.