what's a good terminal emulator that supports w3mimg and bold fonts, and isn't urxvt
>>55032683
rxvt
>>55032683
Gnome, I'm serious.
>>55032697
it supports w3mimg?
>>55032712
no idea im just shitposting
>>55032683
Lilyterm
>>55032743
tell me about it.
>>55032759
I love it. It has a right click menu for theming, fonts, saving config in dedicated file, supports bold, I used it with vim, tmux, etc.
>>55032683
>isn't urxvt
urxvt
what do you have against urxvt anon?
>>55032791
And I used it in XFCE and AwesomeVM.
>>55032810
u can't use ctrl left/right, and have to use instead alt, this Co flicks with interactive sessions on ghci and python, and also with my wm
xterm.
>>55033108
This.
UXterm mustard race reporting in.
>>55032683
Here's a table of terminal emulators and their w3m-img support. (Ignore the \033[14t part)
https://github.com/dylanaraps/neofetch/wiki/Images-in-the-terminal#terminal-emulator
Any terminal emulator from this decade should support bold fonts.
>>55032712
what does w3mimg need? doesn't it just need $WINDOWID to be set?
>>55032683
what's wrong with urxvt?
>>55034801
read tbread
plus, some bloat
>>55032683
suckless simple terminal
http://st.suckless.org
>>55035789
doesn't support bold fonts
>>55035789
>>55036153
doesn't even support scrolling up
>>55032683
Whoever drew this forgot blink182 in the poobar window. It's not /g/ without enema of the state and loli wallpapers
>>55036421
theres a patch
Terminator every day of the week and twice on Sundays
xterm does the job. Support scroll bars, every font on the planet, etc.
>>55032791
no w3mimg support
>>55032683
>all these inrorrect answers
termite
