[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Home]
4chanarchives logo
>own a high end graphics card capable of 1440p and 4K >still
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.

You are currently reading a thread in /g/ - Technology

Thread replies: 158
Thread images: 16
File: 1465611328277.jpg (436 KB, 1101x773) Image search: [Google]
1465611328277.jpg
436 KB, 1101x773
>own a high end graphics card capable of 1440p and 4K
>still use a 1080p monitor

Who else does this here, don't be shy.
>>
I hate chinese cartons.
>>
>>55029793
It's Japanese animation you idiot, or if you'd like Japanese cartoon. It's not Chinese.
>>
>>55029825
Its commie shit either way
>>
>>55029834
Japs aren't communists
>>
>>55029742
People who claim they are running games on 60fps MAX on cards like a GTX 960 or 970 or 380 are lying to themselves.

To actually run a lot of games with every single setting cranked up as far as it goes and still get > 60 fps you still need top of the line card.
>>
>>55029742
awoo~
>>
>>55029859
And I'm referring to playing at 1920x1080 resolution.
>>
I'm planning on getting a GTX 1070 and a 1080p/144hz monitor. Is it overkill? Anyway I'd rather go for that over a 60hz 1440p panel.
>>
>>55029859
crysis run for me at 90~ fps on the more cluttered scenery at max settings at 1080p using a gtx970
>>
>>55029866
Not side why but I'm keking hard also checked.
>>
>>55029859
I have the 980ti and I still play in 1080p.
>>
>>55029882

>144hz

Considering you would need 144 fps to make full use of that, a 1070 would well suited to it.
>>
>>55029742
I do this but with a 1366x768 smart tv and a crt monitor 1280x1024
>>
>>55029893
Crysis is a fucking old game. Try it with Crysis 3 and every single menu setting turned all the way up. You'll get a frame rate in the 30s.
>>
>>55029859
Depends on the game. I have a 380 4GB and commonly play BF4 multiplayer with FPS ranging between 100 to 144 where I have it capped. Newer games corrupted by shillworks and stuff like that need not apply.
>>
>downsample from 1440 to 1080p
>with post process AA on top of it

Call the cops niggas

I'd rather have a clean, aliasing free image then some high resolution shit
>>
>>55029825
>being this new
>>
>>55029961
It's accomplishing the same thing but I guess I agree. 4K is a meme at the sizes typical for PC monitors.
>>
>>55029930
No, I'm not. You don't need 16x anti-aliasing to play games, but the option is there in many games.

In fact at 1080p you could flick between 4x and 8x MSAA screenshots and you would be -extremely- hard pressed to see any difference. It's 99% placebo and a waste of processing power.

But if you want MAX SETTINGS EVERYTHING TO THE RIGHT at 1080p you still need a big card.

And of course there are things like Nvidia Hairworks and TressFX that need a strong GPU no matter what resolution you're running at.
>>
>>55029742
Dark Souls 3 requires a GTX 970 to hit 60 fps at 1080p. Not sure if you call that a high-end card. I would.
>>
>>55029825
>being this new
>>
>>55029742
Gtx 970, uses it to play garrys mod on a 1080p monitor
>>
>>55029950
That game is very well optimized from what I've read, and it is the epitome of AAA so it is designed to run well on toasters.

However, I'm still not convinced you are doing this with every setting cranked as far as possible.
>>
>>55029843
he's baiting you anon. it's a joke. stop getting your body pillow in a twist
>>
>>55029742

Do you feel bad for making a shitty thread OP? It's either Bait or a boring question which could be summed up with lack of funds or laziness. Ultimately who gives a damn
>>
>>55029742
whats that anime (not mimosa and woo) from?
>>
>>55029950
a 380 can barely average 60 fps on bf4 1080p 4x msaa, fuck off
>>
>>55030161
That's in some single player benchmark that all of the sites use which is not at all indicative of actual in game results. In actual use I'm usually up around 120-144 using the game's very own FPS counter, with settings as high as they will go, not including supersampling of course. It is being pushed by a 5820k, so that may account for some of the "bonus" performance I seem to get from it.
>>
>>55029742
GTX 970
1080p 60Hz IPS Monitor

Because 1440p 144Hz IPS monitors are $700 and there's no 144Hz IPS Monitor that's $200~300

I don't care about 1440p
>>
>>55030099
The game is so old now obviously it will run well.
>>
>>55029896
but why buy a 600 dollar gpu when you're not going to use it
>>
>>55031957
I got a GTX 1080 and I just run Gentoo on it and don't really have many games.
>>
File: 1453092358276.jpg (19 KB, 217x395) Image search: [Google]
1453092358276.jpg
19 KB, 217x395
>>55031977
im sorry but it's just bizarre behavior.

i bought a formula 1 car to drive to the grocery story and back.
>>
144hz 1080P monitor with a 390 here. doom maxed uses 3.6GB Vram, the newest games on 1080p maxed can give your gfx card a run for its money :^)
>>
>>55032037
I want to be a normal person like everyone else and join in and play video games like all normal people do, so I got a stupid expensive computer and put Windows on, but I am struggling using Windows and I'm trying to download games on it but it takes forever. And I am rubbish at playing games anyway and I don't think people would hate me any less or want to play games with me now. Gentoo kind of works at least and I can read emails and talk to people on IRC who hate me and browse /g/ really smoothly. And I got Portal 2 and Left 4 Dead 2 and Minecraft on Gentoo, which is plenty of games really.

I don't actually know what games it is people play which need all these fancy graphics cards.
>>
>>55029825
kys newfag
>>
>>55029742
My 390 is capable of running a lot of games well at 1440p but I'm stuck with a shitty 1080p monitor for the time being because money.
>>
>>55032153
something about this post is really, really cute but i cant put my finger on what it is
>>
1440x900 master race
>>
>>55029825
GTFO New Fag
>>
>>55033058
GTFO pleb scum
>>
I don't understand what's the point of getting a very high end card, made for 1440p/4k at maybe 60-45fps if the game's settings are going to be lower to have better framerate. With 1080p you get the best resolution, it won't matter what settings you pick, and it will last you more than 4 years with that card on a 1080p monitor.
>>
>>55032153
>this fabricated gibberish

There is no person on the face of the earth who has installed Gentoo and also struggles to use Windows at the same time.
>>
>>55035487
Installing Gentoo is easy and actually does what it's supposed to, except for when you have a mess of broken and blocked packages. Windows is horrible and has an awful UI and nothing works as it's supposed to. Even installing Windows is a horrible experience and is pretty much impossible.
>>
>>55029742
I'm using Intel HD graphics for my 1280x1024 monitor.
>>
>>55033058
>>55035708
fags. kys
>>
>>55029742
i do.

all i want is to get as close to 120/144fps on Max or high settings on 1080p.
>>
File: Graphics_081e50_5740107.jpg (71 KB, 680x765) Image search: [Google]
Graphics_081e50_5740107.jpg
71 KB, 680x765
>>55029742
Just because you can run the game at 1440p with a "1440p card" doesn't mean you'll enjoy the frame rate tanking to 30s on heavy scenes loaded with FX.
>>
if the 1080p monitor is 144hz, then you are making good use of your graphics card
>>
>>55032218
>>55035844
>kys
good meme
>>
>>55029825
fucking took the bait
>>
>>55029948
But why is that the case when Crysis 1 looks better than 3.
>>
>>55029742
Nope, 750 ti with 4k monitor here
>>
>>55029825
i think i've been double baited
>>
>>55029742
I'm gonna get me an Rx 480 but I have a VGA 1680x1050 and I'm not even imagining using VR.
>>
>>55032153
>>55035688
Come on. You could at least try to bait us.
>>
>>55039390
Is it really that farfetched to have not used Windows in such a long time that everything about it feels awkward and unintuitive?

I did actually waste several days trying to install Windows 10 under UEFI + GPT, which doesn't work at all since the Windows installer is buggy and it's very difficult to get even the slightest clue as to what's gone wrong. On this same computer, I installed Gentoo without issue in GPT with UEFI, and it all worked smoothly and my custom kernel config worked almost straight away and it can run Second Life fine with nvidia drivers with all the graphics settings all the way up.

I'm almost getting used to Windows now, but it's an ugly hack of programs which don't quite work perfectly just to do simple things like moving and resizing a floating window without having to drag tiny thin borders around the windows, and having actual usable workspaces. (Native Windows 10 workspaces are kind of disappointing.)
>>
>>55029742
1080p monitor with a 980ti

But I have a Vive which keeps that card very much humble
>>
I bought a 1440p monitor when my old GPU couldn't even handle newer games in 1080p anymore.
>>
>>55029825
It's "Japanimation" you idiot, or if you'd like Nihongo no anime. It's not Cantonese.
>>
>>55029742
Because I cant find a good monitor too buy.
Tried getting a Asus PG279Q, but I returned it because it had horrible backlight bleeding.
And I dont want to go through the whole rma shit again so im sticking with my old samsung syncmaster for now.
>>
File: 773-0b.jpg (135 KB, 1024x768) Image search: [Google]
773-0b.jpg
135 KB, 1024x768
>>55029793
>I hate chinese cartons.
>chinese cartons
man, sucks to be you, these things are great.
>>
File: 1450231967101.png (18 KB, 225x225) Image search: [Google]
1450231967101.png
18 KB, 225x225
>>55029742
well fuck, my 780 ti can apparently run 3840x2160
Still using my 1080p monitor...
>>
>>55029859
Define max
I know its a stupid thing to say, but we have all see games where there is no difference between low and high visually, but you can see a massive performance hit (fallout 4 god rays for one, several games textures from high to ultra have no difference, just using an uncompressed version which eats ram but has next to no visual improvement. or games where things are rendered so far away from the player that they realistically could not see the speck on their screen without a magnifying glass and a higher then 4k resolution.

I have a 280x, most games i play i can easily max, and thanks to me not liking how some graphic settings look (soft shadows for one) i get to turn down processor intense things and at least for me, get a better over all looking game.
>>
>>55037951
nope, you got a point for 1 over 2, but 3 looks better then 1, however i believe 1 to still be the better game, also, does 3 have a physics engine like 1 had?
>>
>>55029742
nothing runs 4k maxed single card without frame dips.

I would much rather push 60fps everything rather then get some hardware based aa.

even then, i would rather push 1080p120/144 rather than push the resolution.

little brother just got a 1440 144 monitor, the difference is night and day as far as refresh goes between his side by side old 60hrz, but the resolution difference, i honestly don't notice it at all.

for me,

43ich philips 4k monitor for productivity
120/144 g/free-sync monitor for gaming.
60hrz 1080p for backup in case they break if i had the money.
>>
>>55029742
got 980ti and titan and i use two 19 inch dell screens at 1280x1024 kek
>>
Getting a 1070 for a 1920x1080 60fps monitor.
Who /overkill/ here?
>>
who budget gamer here
got this for $150 bux and couldnt be happier with 4GB vram
>>
>>55030046
This is how I feel about running at 1440p.

In terms of jaggies, I usually can't tell the difference between 1080p with anti-aliasing, and 1440p with no anti-aliasing.
>>
>>55029859
>Have 970
>Play everything at max no problem
>Default res is 1360
>Even 2x the res on Dark Souls 3 at max never drops below 60

Maybe you need to upgrade other parts if you can't pull 1080 at max settings.
>>
1440p 120hz monitor with a vaporx 290x

Can barely hit 60 maxed in recent releases
>>
File: 1080p to 1440p 4K scaling.png (353 KB, 520x1131) Image search: [Google]
1080p to 1440p 4K scaling.png
353 KB, 520x1131
>>55041659

I've been thinking of upgrading to 1440p since I need a new monitor and 4K is in its infancy, but I'm worried about the scaling of 1080p content. Do you find things that were designed for 1080p looking blurry at all?
>>
>>55041294
>$150 bux
>150 dollars bux

>retards buying amd
nothing to see here folks
>>
>>55042374
I refuse to use windows scaling options because it makes everything look like I need glasses. High quality videos looks fine, it's only streaming media like youtube where I notice a drop in quality.
>>
>>55042421

Thank, as long as it's bearable I guess it should be too bad. 1440p it is.
>>
>>55030078
Dark Souls 3 has a fuck ton of optimization problems through
>>
>>55042374


4K = 4x 1080 so the scaling is perfect.
a 24 inch 4K monitor with an 1080p image scaled will look the same as a native 1080p 24 inch monitor
>>
File: so much room for activities.jpg (686 KB, 2560x1440) Image search: [Google]
so much room for activities.jpg
686 KB, 2560x1440
>>55042583
It's better than bearable. It's downright great.
>>
>>55042663

That's why I made the post, I've been considering a 1440p monitor since it will be a few years before 4K monitors settle in price and quality, but I was concerned about scaling content to a non-multiple resolution. I was just asking how bad the scaling looks.
>>
File: 4k1080.png (16 KB, 1277x672) Image search: [Google]
4k1080.png
16 KB, 1277x672
>>55042720
it depends on your scaling, but think of it like this, since the pixels themselves are becoming so small will you really notice if a pixel is in the wrong spot or not ?
When the pixels are big (1080p display) you notice these things, when the pixels are much smaller (4K and up) it becomes harder and harder to notice individual pixles being in the wrong place/scaled incorrectly.

I would say go for the 4K monitor instead, it is becoming the next standard for media

I've got a 4K monitor, playing games at 1080 just make things look more 'blurry' but really that is because the representation of what a pixel is are 4x bigger at 1080.
>>
File: 1257879157923.jpg (97 KB, 435x435) Image search: [Google]
1257879157923.jpg
97 KB, 435x435
>>55029742
> Video gayman √
> Weeb √
Fucking >>>/v/
>>
File: nvidja-gimp.jpg (627 KB, 1920x2160) Image search: [Google]
nvidja-gimp.jpg
627 KB, 1920x2160
>>55029742
My 670 can't even play doom at the most shitiest settings.
>>
>>55042828
But when I buy a 4K monitor I want to invest in something great that I can use for years. I'm just not sure if it's worth it yet. 1440p monitors are getting pretty cheap now due to 4K, so I've been considering getting one for the next year or two.

My last monitor (lg ips236v-pn) now 'belongs' to my ex-wife, so I've been using a 13" Cinteq for the past four months. I need a new screen, so I'm not too bothered if it's a 'temporary' one.
>>
File: 20160612_093403.jpg (3 MB, 4032x3024) Image search: [Google]
20160612_093403.jpg
3 MB, 4032x3024
>4k monitor
>Intel HD 3000
>>
I've had a Dell 1440x900 monitor for years and it still just werks so I probably won't be assed to upgrade until it dies.
>>
>>55029987
>>55030084
>>55032218
>>55033111
>>55037018
>>55039300
>>55039597
the real newfags got double baited
>>
>>55042988
Been using my Dell UltraSharp 2407WFP for ~10 years. Pretty good going from a 15" TN to a 24" S-PVA.

It wasn't cheap though, but this is set it and forget it tech.

Budget?
>>
>>55029742
>4K & 1440p
>thinks this is the best quality and rathers skips HD because it's too blurry.
Enjoy $5000 down the drain faggot. Now kill yourself.
>>
>>55043202

Up to £300 ($4XX?) is what I'm looking for, I'm not bothered by second hand either.
>>
>>55043256
AOC do a 1440p panel for £230 on amazon. Best part is you can OC it to about 90-120hz.

Dell also do a 1440p for about £300.
>>
>>55029742
my monitor is a 1680x1050.. and i still dont think my GTX 970 can run it properly.
>>
I have a 1080p monitor, but don't plan on upgrading in the next 10 years because of muh VR headset
>>
>>55043290

Thanks, that's the one I'm considering now, it's £200 on eBay new.
>>
I'll be using the 8GB RX 480 next month, which can do 1440/60 and 4k/30 with a 1080p monitor.
>>
>>55029843
Japs are the most capitalist people on the planet.

It's the only 1st world country that leaves the homeless and disabled to die.
>>
>>55043852
That would make them the most 1st world country then
>>
>>55030156
Gundam Thunderbolt. Pretty good if you like mech porn.
>>
Because I have a 560ti.

And my eyes are shit so I can't use a 4K monitor.
>>
>>55043986
Are you me Anon. I have a 560 Ti as well, and 4K also makes my eyes bleed.
>>
>>55044025
Even 1080p is too much for me sometimes, even with my glasses on, and with the 560ti I've never had to upgrade it literally runs everything perfectly.
>>
>>55043953
thats the best kind of porn

Oh how i love it when cars bunch up during rush hours

those warm exhausts and roofs..mmm
>>
>>55029825
nice bait; a raged weaboo won't call anime cartoons
>>
>>55043290

Ended up getting the Dell U2515H for £235
>>
>>55043852
America does that too, the only difference is that the Japs don't pretend to feel bad about it.
>>
>>55044350
Good choice to be honest. Hope you got it from Amazon on the off chance it has backlight bleed or a dead pixel.
>>
>>55044387
We have a fuckton of homeless shelters here in the US.

They dont' exist AT ALL in Japan.

There isn't food stamps, etc

They do reward you for having kids now though, because that declining population.
>>
>>55044399
I got it on ebay due to it being £20 cheaper. If it has an issue I'll see if I can get a replacement, they have multiple stocked as well as their own website.
>>
>>55044517
Hope it turns out alright first time round anon, enjoy.
>>
>>55044735

Thanks, Dell's a big name with screens so I'm not worried.
>>
>>55029742
I'm still on 900p senpai
>>
>>55044811
We not just grab a second hand 1080p monitor for pocket change?
>>
>>55045132
non synced refresh rates and resolution makes my shit lag
>>
>>55045618


specs?
>>
>>55029742
I will still be using 4:3 displays until they become literally unusable
>>
>>55045640
2500k @4.5ghz
gtx 970
16gb ram
128gb ssd for os, hdds for rest
650w PSU

1680x1050@120hz monitor
>>
>>55029742
>1080p
>1440p
16:9 plebs are so disgusting.
>>
>>55045714
Did you say you were using a 900p monitor?
>>
>>55045747
nope, that was some other guy
>>
>>55045744
16:10 is a niche..
What is the point of trying to be edgy and going with something other than the mass market standard ?
>>
>>55045772
I own a graphics card that can run almost every game I play at 60+ fps at 1920x1080. I also use a CRT at 1600x1200.

4:3 master race.
>>
>>55045744
16:10 only makes sense if the screen is bellow 23". Unless you mean full desk monitors, then I can understand wanting something wider.
>>
>>55045806
> I also use a CRT at 1600x1200
2edgy4me
>>
I want a 1440p monitor but I'd probably still run games at 1080p because I want to make sure I have over 60fps no matter what.

I've considered a 144hz monitor but my friend talks about how he can't play so many games because some are locked at 60fps or the animations are at least and its all ruined for him now. Doesn't seem worth it.
>>
>>55045879
Then buy a 1080p monitor. Running things at non-native resolutions looks like shit and you should rip your eyes out if you disagree.
>>
>>55045908
looks good to me on my 1050p monitor desu senpai
>>
>21:9 is rarely supported for down sampling in games

Cant wait to get my 480 tho
>>
>>55045925
I bet you also watch 4:3 content stretched to 16:9 you fucking pleb.
>>
>>55045908
I did it before 1080p was standard. I had a 1080p monitor because I like more desktop space, but games looked fine to me at 720p because its not a static image. Chill out man.
>>
>>55045974
Um.. 1050p is 16:10 but ok senpai
>>
I have a 390x on 1080p, I think that's fine.
>>
>>55046148
16:9 is not fine
>>
>>55046184
I don't really care about a centimeter of extra screen space, I have more than one monitor.
>>
>>55045831
After filtering out useless options, $/pixel is the determining factor.

Enthusing about personal comfort isn't edgy.

I just hope for that anon's sake the CRT was the earlier purchase, or free.

>>55046275
>centimeter
Pixels you goof.
>>
>>55029742
I just picked up a 980 to go with my 144hz 1080p monitor.
>>
>>55045831

2048x1280 @ 90hz CRT master race.
>>
cuz i have 1080p 144hz.
>>
best monitor.

1920x1920
>>
>>55043086

the real newfag got triple baited
>>
>>55029742
I'm on 1200p and no plans of upgrading my screen any time soon.
>>
>>55042390
kek
>>
>>55043000
What's the problem?
>>
>>55029859
>playing anything released after 2014
>>
>>55041448
I notice a lack of antialiasing on my 1440p, however i only ever have to use 2x at most to make it completely seamless.
>>
File: 1465780945880.jpg (94 KB, 800x670) Image search: [Google]
1465780945880.jpg
94 KB, 800x670
>>55029825
>>
The biggest crime is owning a 60hz monitor when you have a decent graphics card
>>
>>55029742
As far as I know there is no card on the market that could run ANY title fully maxed out on 1440p or 4K.

Let alone 120, 144hz.

> inb4 but 30fps is fine
>>
>>55029742
Nigga I don't even play at 1080p the highest resolution setting on my monitor is 1680x1050.
>>
Looking at getting an acer XR341CK for $700, has anyone heard anything about an updated model? (They're doing a new x34p for gsync), or other alternatives on the horizon?
>>
File: 1465485415139.jpg (36 KB, 361x441) Image search: [Google]
1465485415139.jpg
36 KB, 361x441
>>55029825
Tell them, brother. Don't let them disrespect anime
>>
>32 inches TV, 1366x768 native resolution
>can be pushed to 1080p, but text is rendered horribly this way
>use this as my main monitor anyway
Can't help it, watching chinese cartoons on it is great though.
I've got a 1070 coming and I can hopefully find a good 1080p monitor with gsync.
>>
>>55054416
my 960 strix runs games just fine on a 1440p
definitely runs rocket league at 60fps maxed out
>>
GTX 1080 can barely run 1080p at high (+120Hz) frame rates.
>>
>>55029742
Still playing at 1366x768, my nigga, I don't even care.
>>
>>55029742

I still use monitor with 1680x1050 native resolution and Im about to buy RX480 at July.

At least I dont have to worry about 4k resolutions and such.
>>
>>55029859
This is true, man. It's basically impossible to play GTA V maxed up on 60fps at 1080 using a 970, mostly because of this fucking useless 0.5GB.
>>
File: 1430945913311.gif (1 MB, 250x141) Image search: [Google]
1430945913311.gif
1 MB, 250x141
>>55043000
>buy a 4k monitor with an AMD tech built in
>for an Intel PC
Thread replies: 158
Thread images: 16

banner
banner
[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / biz / c / cgl / ck / cm / co / d / diy / e / fa / fit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mu / n / news / o / out / p / po / pol / qa / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Home]

All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties. Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
If a post contains personal/copyrighted/illegal content you can contact me at [email protected] with that post and thread number and it will be removed as soon as possible.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com, send takedown notices to them.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from them. If you need IP information for a Poster - you need to contact them. This website shows only archived content.