>chromefags will defend this
At we support Webp you fucking cuck.
>>55019250
> /webdev/
what a loser
>>55019311
>using a webpage right now
>>55019343
nope ;^)
>>55019362
screenshot or fake
>>55019527
really?
>>55019654
ok, you can proceed
>>55019272
Can we ban Google reps/employees/shareholders/fanboys/shills from posting on /g/, please?
>>55019750
>banning moot
>>55019250
Using Chromeme version 53 here and I don't need that.
>>55019272
LOLOLLOLOLOLOLOL LE SMUG ANIME GRILS
>>55020245
>jew moot memes for years
>jew moot gets ridiculed for being a cuck, everyone on the site begins to universally hate him as he starts fucking with boards to censor them
>jew moot gets butthurt and sells the site to some asian for a gorillian
>jew moot gets a job at google a few months later
>google comes out as supporting the TPP and altering search results with political motivations
is anyone really all that surprised?
>>55020245
Who?
>>55019654
Yep
>>55020334
>>55020345
>>55020345
>not running n beta
Die
>>55020355
>>55020355
>>55020355
>>55020334
>>55020345
>>55020351
>>55020355
>>55020364
>>55020367
hi >>>/reddit/phonefags
>>55020367
>>55020371
What's your fucking problem?
>>55019272
>WebP
>uses VP8
>Will never use VP9
>VP10 being abandoned in favor of AV1
What's the point of supporting WebP at this point, if they won't be improving much else on it?
>>55020371
>>55020374
>>55020394
>>55019272
>mfw my browser supports webp and I don't need to resort to Chrome shitware
>>55020402
>>55020376
My problem is people who will keep replying to the same comment over and over and over again just to prove that they “get it” or are “part of it” or whatever.
This kind of cancer permeates throughout all of reddit, which is exactly the reason I fucking hate that website. You can't read 5 comments without some sperglord going “HURR REFERENCE TO NOT-EVEN-OBSCURE THING” and 10+ people replying to him with other references to the same thing to prove they “get it”.
It's just cringy, not funny, annoying, worthless noise that obscures any amount of signal the website could possibly contain. Then they come on 4chan and shit the place up with garbage like >>55020374
Yes, we get it, you can take a screenshot. And you use a dumbed down browsing device. I bet you must feel proud of that fact. Good job. Now can you stop wasting 4chan's bandwidth and 4chan reader's time and mental tolerance for idiocy?
>>55020367
>>55020402
>>55020411
It's a samefag, check the battery percentages anon.
>>55020421
That's even sadder. People like this should be range banned.
>>55020418
>>55020421
No shit, Sherlock
>>55020421
>>55020425
>>55020411
this happens a lot on 4chan though, the only difference on redit is the fucking babby tier PC humour. i browse reddit at work when im shit bored, but when i want real uncensored opinions and good laughs i come to 4chan
EDIT: Thanks for the gold kind stranger! I can now feed my family :)
EDIT 2: Just for everyone in the comments below, the joke is that it's called BABBY not baby!
EDIT 3: Oh wow, I never expected to get so many updoots for this comment. Please if you can check out my blog @ davidcanoes.my-free-site.com. Thanks!
>>55020437
>>55020447
>>55020447
>>55020455
>>55020455
fuck your battery is draining fast
what phone you got
>>55020437
holy shit dude your battery drains fast
>buying a $800 memedevice that only lasts a few hours
phonefags should be banned from reproducing
>>55020455
>>55020465
why haven't you upgraded to win10 yet, the free upgrade period is almost over
also just because you want it so badly
>those tabs
>>55020467
>>55020466
It's an LG G3, original Battery
>>55020475
ah yeah, fair enough then
download sleep as android and go to bed anon, it's late
>>55020437
>No shit, Sherlock
I was talking to the other anon there, since he was complaining about people piling on the whole posting your screen thing. Why are you doing this, by the way, anon?
>>55020506
>>55020481
>he actually went to bed
>>55019250
just do@keyframes fa-spin {
}
.element {
animation: fa-spin;
}
>>55020468
WE HACKZ N STUFF
>>55020931
chrome requires -webkit
>>55021482
no it doesn't
http://codepen.io/anon/pen/ezJXgE
>>55021482
Nah chrome honors standard properties most of the time.
Safari on the other hand, fuck. You can't even list multiple transition properties without using -webkit-transition-property. It doesn't fully support the -webkit-transition shorthand
