http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/NVIDIA/GeForce_GTX_1070/
THANK YOU BASED NVIDIA
>>55008697
>polaris not listed
k based shill
>>55008825
It's not out yet
hah
>>55008697
>1080
>25% more performance for 28% less power.
>actually need to increase power profile by 20% to achieve this reliably.
>somehow rated to be 70% more efficient than 980ti.
What? This is like when I watched a delidding video for the i7 6700. The guy flat out said he needed to do this because of excessive core temp differentials in order to give it a good review.
>>55008697
Funny thing is that "Dollars per performance" table is an exact copy of that one.
>>55009053
THANKYOU BASED KENMORE
>>55008697
>The year of our Lord two thousand sixteen
>giving a fuck about wattage in your desktop
Looking forward to the coming VRs per watt graph.
>>55008697
If I have money to burn, is it even worth just buying a 1070 just because they're cheaper or should I just go straight for the 1080 and not bother worrying if the 1070 is going to be shit tier average in a couple or years?
![perfdollar_1920_1080[3].png](https://i.imgur.com/AY2YQ9H.png "perfdollar_1920_1080[3].png")
Top fucking kek. RX 480 already won!
>>55009940
Wait for Vega and compare
>>55008825
everyone already knows its r9 390 performance
Does this take into account actual power draw or advertised power draw (which Nvidia is lying about)?
>>55008825
>AMD hasn't even released benchmarks outside of AotS
>but you're a shill for not including benchmarks for their new cards
>>55010051
>j-just wait, AMD will not be a steaming pile of shit someday!
>>55010349
Here's a chart from a reviewer. And before you jump to conclusions, it's measuring the entire system, not just the graphics card.
>>55010372
Woops, wrong pic.
![power_maximum[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/BYiOFCJ.png "power_maximum[1].png")
>>55010329
It's at least Fury performance.
You Nvidia shills are fucking busy today.
Lmao.
>>55010494
>a $200 card can suddenly match a $600 one
Maybe Nvidias r&d would be capable of that but not Advanced Rebrand Devices
7.5
.
5
>>55010716
You're that guy that said you'll keep posting this no matter how many times it gets disproven, right?
>>55010743
That guy is such a loser at life, eventhough it has been DEBUNKED thoroughly, guess he likes licking AYYMD's ass so much
>>55008697
It's trending at $650 on ebay right now.
What a fucking joke of a paper launch.
>>55008697
>770 performing worse than the 960
>>55010603
Nvidia wouldn't be capable of doing that, it's against their blood to release a card that cheap when they could charge $600 for it.
>buying madbutt feminist cards
massive joke
>>55010743
Nice photoshop skills you got there.
>>55010792
which one of these green piles of puke is supposed to look better
>>55010803
https://twitter.com/RyanSmithAT/status/737042686683713536
U MAD, AYYMDPOORFAG?
7.5
>>55010814
Nice try cuck.
>>55010819
How much is nvidia paying him to post false information? Can I be a paid shill too? Where do I sign up?
>>55010833
don't ever talk about me or my wife's graphics card again
>>55010847
>being this delusional
>gets proven wrong
>still shills and deludes
even for 4chan, this is an extra special kind of autistic
7.5
>>55010372
>it's measuring the entire system, not just the graphics card
So what you're saying is that it is entirely useless in the context of our comparing _GPU_ performance.
This is why controls exist.
>>55010847
You are retard
7.5
Is the 1070 good for a lag free VR experience? I know 1080 is but I may just get this instead?
>>55010977
But it's using the exact same system. The only thing that is different between the tests is the GPUs. The reviewer only had the money for the tool to measure from the wall outlet, not the much more expensive gear to measure individual components.
>>55011042
It only has 7.5gb of gddr5 vram so no, not really.
>>55011042
The 1070 has ~20% less horsepower so to speak, but the experience will otherwise be the same as a 1080.
>650 euro for a hybrid version
fucking jewidia
>>55011179
What are you gonna do, buy a AMD turd?
>>55011264
i will stick with Intel HD Graphics 530
>>55011330
Ay yo senpai waddup.
>maxing games 30 fps on this ice age resolution
>still no stores selling aftermarket 1070s
>zotac FE at 550 usd
>only 7.5 gb of real gddr5 vram
shocking
>>55011478
>Desperate AMDfags grasping at straws
>>55010028
That's for the founder's edition of the card with some stupid markup - Duh. If you bothered to read the conclusion, the editor specifically says the price/perf can't be beat if the cards are anywhere near the RRP of the non-Founder's edition.
>>55010349
Lying how exactly?
There seems to be this retard disease going about where people look at nano & micro second scale graphs and conclude that because the card draws 300W for 1ms it somehow needs 300W to work. Y'know, like as if capacitors didn't exist.
>>55011580
>expecting 1070 to be anywhere near MSRP
>>55011631
Why not? There's a few non-Founder's 1080's that are pretty much coming out at RRP. So why not 1070s?
Feel free to be in denial if it soothes your butthert, but even in the worst case if card manufacturers have to make an old-style reference cooler (as in, the crappy plastic ones) to make a card cheap enough to sell at the RRP, it'll still be an insanely good deal, enough so to beat everyone else in price/perf (at least until Polaris turns up, for that we'll have to wait and see).
RX 480 confirmed for £235. Which means two of them cost £470 which is more than the GTX 1070.
http://www.kikatek.com/P788949/21260-00-20G-SAPPHIRE-TECHNOLOGY-RADEON-RX-480
Looks like Nvidia won.
>>55011708
1: Why the fuck would you think some random retail store is a legit source for that kind of information? You don't think that store wouldn't make up some BS price so that they can get the page up and ready to go for when they do get a real price? ... Or just to catch people searching for the card on google (which it seems includes you).
2: USD nigger, USD. My country has it's own currency too but I don't throw AUD around and pretend people know the exchange rates off by heart.
>>55011708
That sounds about right, if a bit on the high side. Here's a EU price for a retailer.
>>55011042
Devs haven't started taking advantage of the multi projection capabilities of Pascal. I bought a 1070 for this feature alone because I expect major VR boosts with my Vive. I'll note that I currently am using igpu so I think this was the best decision.
>>55010778
that's performance per watt, smart guy.
>>55008697
>Caring about efficiency
FUCK OF GREENPEACE
>>55012490
More like caring about my wallet
>>55011708
>75-80% of 1070 performance
>50-55% of 1070 price
That's a clear win for AMD
>>55010716
>not understanding the difference between MiB and MB
7680 MiB = 8192 MB, idiot.
>>55012567
except that people aren't going to buy a 970 tier performing GPU with 4gb of vram, not for $200 or any other price. because the majority of people already bought cards of that level 2 1/2 years ago.
>as fast as a 1080 once OCed
it's the 970 all over again, AMD is finished
>>55010028
>mfw i'm still rocking an oc'd 7970 (bought 4 fucking years ago), which performs slightly better than a 280x
>>55012855
>less than 10%
>the majority
top kek
480 is close to R9 Fury in performance, which makes it faster than 98% of steam hwsurvey cards.
>>55013004
>speculation
>>55011580
>actually thinking AIBs will be cheaper
>>55012908
I'm kinda glad that there's not a huge difference between GDDR5 and GDDR5X. I'll definitely be getting a 1070 for MSRP or cheaper in a few months or so.
I'll need to figure out what I'm going to do with my reference 770 though
>>55008697
Nvidia fags are the most retarded people ever. Is nvidia a nigger brand?
>>55011603
Nvidia always lies. Their GPUs go over rated tdp even averaged over a entire test run of some games. This has been happening since the 400 series.
why people don't wait that both AMD and Nvidia release all their GPUs ? AMD is releasing a new architecture and the performances of a 480X are quite impressive for a $200 GPU. Their 490 will probably be very interesting and might offer a better price per performances compared to the 1070 and maybe the 1080, and it will be released in october.
I'm pretty sure most people buying 1070 and 1080 can run their programs with a decent quality. Waiting 2 month wouldn't be that long.
>>55013270
You are talking to nvidia customers man they barely have an iq over 80 they are literally retarded
>>55013270
Because for someone with a decent job $700 is nothing, people who are willing to pay will pay, people who aren't willing to pay will wait.
Don't like it?
Well you ought to learn to deal with it and stop giving a crap what people do with their money specially if that money is used for a hobby they enjoy.
There are people who are also going to buy the 480 on day one, just go look at the AMD subreddit, literally a thread about "Who is going to buy the 480 on day one" right now over there.
There are also the AMD fanboy who bought the Fury X even after they found out it was weaker than the GTX980Ti and had terrible OC headroom.
>>55013270
Why would I wait for AMD when I refuse to buy AMD on principle?
>>55013425
Why do you refuse to buy AMD?
>>55013450
Cursor glitch still isn't fixed, no comparable analog to Nvidia Inspector
>>55013461
>Cursor glitch still isn't fixed
Jesus christ, really?
>>55013475
Yup. Its still there.
>>55013461
Holy shit, I never knew that was a thing. Good thing I've never bought an AMD card. If they can't get cursor tracking right then how am I going to trust them with my games??
>>55013270
>Their 490 will probably be very interesting and might offer a better price per performances
It's not that it "might" be more cost effective, it WILL be as is always the case with AMD, but disregarding price and looking solely at performance the NV card always has superior benchmarks.
>>55013475
It actually happens on nvidia cards too, but the drivers detect it and refresh the cursor on the same frame. You can spot when it happens if you are paying enough attention.
>>55013461
I have had it happen to me a few times, but I had no idea that was related to the AMD drivers.
Then again, with how much every other update broke my system, the cursor is the least of my problems.
explain this nvidiots
>>55013974
Are they still using the rigged review drivers?
>>55013974
That's it, I guess I'm switching to AMD. Obviously this screenshot from one game is the last straw. I can't believe Nvidia would be so careless as to let this happen. On the plus side, I'd love to have my house a bit warmer in the winter since I live in canada. The polar temperatures of canada's climate and amd's cards should cancel out and give me some nice temperature.
>>55014111
Stay mad.
>>55013974
>>55014043
>>55014111
https://forum.beyond3d.com/threads/nvidia-pascal-reviews-1080-and-1070.57930/page-17#post-1919727
>Just checked it this morning on a GTX 1070. The average performance difference between 368.19 and 368.39 is 0.6%, well inside the margin of error.
Kill yourselves, AYYMDPOORFAGS
Nvidia, fastest and highest image quality
Still trying to slander Nvidia with false accusations while AYYMD continues to cheat with image quality reductions, you sore losers are pretty much disgusting pieces of shit
>>55013974
AMD has tearing and no soft shadows.
Shadows most of the time do not have hard edges.
Also tearing!
I laugh at you for thinking this shows inferiority on Nvidias site, when it is AMD being faulty as fuck here.
TOP KEK, see the comments on Youtube, all the buttmad AYYMDPOORFAGS trying to defend their shitty, dying, bankrupt company.
>>55013974
I googled it and apparently the settings lower themselves because there's not enough memory. Since the 390 is 8gb the settings are not lowered so the 970 receives higher frames.
>>55014145
You know that overusage of lighting is used on consoles all the time to mask bad images.
>>55014253
>3.5 is only a meme
goyvidia BTFO
>>55014156
>falling for nvidiashill lies
>>55014289
Fuck it, I'll take the bait
>Comparing 3.5GB to 8GB and not 4GB
>>55014462
>Buying weak AYYMD hardware unable to handle tessellation
TOP KEK
>>55013407
Doesn't matter how much money you make, $700 is $700.
You can waste it on some meme video card or you can spend it wisely.
>>55012855
Uhh tons of people are going to buy it, $200 is a sweet spot for GPUs, if the 480 can deliver on its promises it will sell like crazy
>>55014510
This, a shitty deal is a shitty deal no matter how much money you make.
>>55010451
>970 higher power draw than 980
Now we know these are lies
>>55011580
That's a clear sign he's a paid shill. Giving price-performance recommendations for a price that exists only in Nvidia fanboys' delusions.
>>55015508
You realise that most people buy the card with the best value in their price range.
That is why price performance ratio usualy is the most important thing for them.
>>55014488
Do you even ASync bro?
No seriously im going to buy the 1070 (found a presale of the eVGA for 415 usd here on mexico) unless AMD shows a 490 before the end of the month at a same price/perfomance.
Nvidia does that kind of shit all the time i have my ol' 770 running and my brother 6870 is catching up.
A friend o mine who is a video producer had been running with 970's and he returned to 580's because they were faster in Premier and other cuda software..and they can't use the new nvenc codecs, the 970's have a workaround too but still runing nvec are not as fast as the 580's.
And lately Nvidia foums are being hard censored because of users with the 700 series having a lot of troubles me included.
>>55016006
Most people think about how powerful their GPU should be and then get the cheapest one with the speed they want.
>>55016083
Where in Mexico?
>>55014510
Or you can waste in on one night stand, it makes no difference how much you waste unless you have a shitty job.
>>55016198
Monterrey.
A friend of my is a reseller for PCH, they sell him at OEM prices.
>>55016216
>wasting $700 on a "one night stand"
Are you retarded?
>>55016257
kek, I've wasted more than $2000 in less than 1 hour on holidays.
If you think $700 its too expensive for something that will last for 1 or 2 years you need to learn to manage your budget better or get a better job, otherwise you need to >Well you ought to learn to deal with it and stop giving a crap what people do with their money specially if that money is used for a hobby they enjoy.
>AMDrones thinking that Polaris will be good after the shitpile that was Fiji
Fucking hilarious. These cucks will never learn.
>>55008697
>percentage over 100
That doesnt even make sense
>>55016375
If i have learned something from /g/ is that the guys who bloat the most.
Are the guys that end buying the most mainstream cards (IE 750Ti - 960 / 270-280)
Otherwise they would be so buttmad about a fucking mainstream card of $200 bucks.
I wonder how will it be when Vega hits or even a 480X/490 (remember AMD announced 100-300usd cards, Nvidia announced 3 cards at different markets, we already got 2)
inb4: 980Ti 3 way sli's being upgraded to 1080 quad sli with custom one off drivers purchased with a lot of neetbux and good boy points.
>>55016478
Wouldn't be*
>>55011708
holy shit that's fucking terrible pricing. amd have fucked up big time. the 1070 is already confirmed to be £320.
>>55013974
>that tearing on the AMD side
Fucking kill yourselves.
