Vi or Emacs
Images are sometimes not shown due to bandwidth/network limitations. Refreshing the page usually helps.
You are currently reading a thread in /g/ - Technology
You are currently reading a thread in /g/ - Technology
Oh well.
First for vim
>>54996482
second for vim
I like emacs, but to each their own.
>>54996493
third for vim
>>54996502
Forth for vim
>>54996069
Emacs and nano.
Emacs + evil mode is objectively the best.
>>54996069
vim
>>54996521
Do people actually use nano?
>>54996527
My nigga. Emacs for lyfe
>>54996521
>nano
When's the last time you've had a mental evaluation?
>>54996069
nano
>>54996587
Go fuck yourself
>>54996521
>>54996587
>I use nano so I can feel snug because I'm not using notepad
I like emacs. But nano and Vi are also pretty comfy.
>>54996069
Why should I use emacs instead of vim?
Vim everywhere at all times
notepad++
>>54996069
N a n o
a a
n n
o o
>>54996069
Bump
>>54996069
pic related + vim
Someone explain why any text editor with a little bit of color to see better is not just as good as vim or emacs
>>54996527
although i agree with this post, i have to go with vi(m), because it's always available. any time i'm fucking around on a server and need to edit config files it's guaranteed to be there.
>>54998535
batch processing of files. if you need to do some repetitive shit with like 50 files at once it is a much more sane way to do so.
