Do you not like me anymore?
I never liked you, but I'm still sticking with you because I haven't found anything better.
SJW infested garbage
>>54978485
I was ambivalent until SJZilla gave me a reason to think badly of you.
>>54978485
The only reason why I'm still using you is because I haven't figured out how to get Chrome to work with JDownloader2.
idk
>>54978485
I've used you for over ten years, occasionally looking at others... But i've always come back to you.
No WebP support, now fuck off.
>>54978485
I was the first one to ditch you when I heard about chromium. I hate your UI, I hate how slow you are, and I hate how youre still the only sane browser of choice in the market.
if you have not been using firefox as your primary browser since at least 2007, then you are probably a faggot. this was proven scientifically by swedish scientists.
>>54978499
Explain
>>54978602
>webp
literally what
>>54978597
>tfw a roach tries to talk to me
I prefer GNU Icecat
>>54978617
>WebP lossless images are 26% smaller in size compared to PNGs
whole 26% top kek
>>54978617
An image format that will replace PNG, GIF, and JPG.
Has lossy/lossless encoding, support for animation, and support for transparency.
>>54978485
i just came back to you today for your restapi debugger addon
say insecure and ill keep using your useful addons
>>54978485
nope, sorry. you became a slow, fat, disoriented whore
>>54978656
>will replace
8/10 of images on the internet are still jpg. webp might be in the 1/100 in 10 years maybe. no need for bloating the browser for nothing.
>>54978643
Depends on what the PNG is like (cartoon, drawing, animu). PNG on >>54978530 was reduced by 36% when converted to lossles PNG.
>>54978679
Sites like ebay already use Webp you knobsocket.
>>54978656
>please change browser so we can save 25% on bandwidth on a few images
>>54978682
*lossless Webp
fucking shit
>>54978485
i still like you but why do you take longer to boot than windows?
>>54978705
More like 50%
This may not mean much for 200x200 res memes but it will make a hell of a difference for 4K res images and higher.
>>54978656
you mean flif
>>54978679
whatever would I do if my browser was bloated? that can't be.
>>54978731
flif is DOA, it remained a meme format for too long and is still in alpha development. Ni web browsers support it.
Whereas Webp is supported by Chrome and it's derivatives + palememe. That covers like 80% of all web users.
>>54978497
this
I use firefox, but I don't know why they can't get their shit together.
HTML5 support on youtube is shit
Netflix still doesn't work.
Their api is horribly documented and breaks all the time.
They add stupid shit which should be plugins.
They break other plugins
>>54978485
Oh, I do :3
>>54978752
webp will never get support outside of google. flif will be adopted soon after it becomes stable because it's obviously superior to all existing formats.
>>54978819
flif is still in alpha development you mongoloid.
Webp already got support in palememe senpai.
So when is firefox getting WebP support? I'm thinking about switching over to chrome because it supports WebP.
>>54978847
that's what I said "after it becomes stable" fempai.
weebp's only redeeming quality is that it's the format for weebs. palemoon is deprecated.
>>54978485
Nope, I'm with your slimmer and younger sister now.
>>54978611
Cant find the image but basically they spent at least 15 grand on removing a "problematic" word from their documentation or code.
>>54978910
Is it true it supports webp or is that a meme?
Maybe I won't have to switch to chrome after all.
>>54978611
Fired the Mozilla CEO literally just because he didn't follow the SJW doctrine. RIP Eich
>>54978941
It does, though it lacks support for some other things, mostly video stuff and extensions (most of the important ones work, though).
>>54978485
I use you because you eat less RAM than Chrome on my poor toaster, but as soon as I get another computer I'll ditch you
It's not you, it's me! I just can't get used to your new pronouns and I don't understand this "demiqueer genderfluid otherkin" nonsense you go on and on about
>>54978485
I'm still on FF because of, in no particular order,
- Vimperator
- Userscripts
- Userstyles
- I don't have to keenly maintain it myself / it gets support (e.g., Rikaisama)
- It's not Google
>>54978485
Never liked you, I went from IE to chrome when it was first released in its beta, you fat ugly filthy browser
>>54978630
atuism
>>54978485
i miss that logo
the new one looks cheap as fuck
shitty material design ruining everything
>>54978485
I'll never understand /g/'s hatred of FF. I've tried multiple browsers multiple times and it's still the best of the bunch. Chrome being the only exception, but I'm a privacy advocate so botnet and all...
>>54980592
FF is slowwwwwwwwww
like seriously.
>>54979822
I'm only considering back up browsers now in case Vimperator goes the way of Pentadactyl and is no longer allowed in on Mozilla's walled garden.
>>54980592
>I'll never understand /g/'s hatred of FF
No such thinh. It's just a vocal minority who fell for google's paid shils.
>>54978485
It's not that I don't like you, just that there are better options.
>>54980166
New logo isn't material design, you dumbass.
>>54978485
You've grown fat and old, mom. I'm off to find your son a better mother
>>54980731
its going into that direction
>>54978960
>and then he created Brave
maybe it wasn't such a bad idea to fire him tbqh senpai
>>54978485
I'm using you because Chrome is even more broken for some reason
My saved tabs don't automatically load anymore ever since the 47 update. What the fuck happened?
>>54981710
>updating
>>54981710
>>54981722
Nevermind, found it: https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/allow-firefox-load-multiple-tabs-background
>>54978485
no
get cancer
Mozilla is disgusting and firefox can't deal well with shit ton of javascript people call websites nowdays
Fuck sjwfox
>>54978485
I never did
>>54981782
>using websites that require JS to run properly
where did it all go so wrong ;_;
>>54978485
e10s in FF48
SOON
>>54978507
This DESU Senpai
>>54978485
no
but there is no viable alternative
>Lagging like crazy while "feed me your RAM" Chrome manages to run fine
>Restarting when installing most extensions
>Touch unfriendly on Windows 10 tablets
>Takes longer to open a page when compared to Chrome
All Firefox is good for is to act as my dedicated porn and *chan browser due to DownThemAll.
>>54978562
can i have your css script anon?
>>54982397
https://userstyles.org/styles/116309/nightly-fox
Not sure which exact colours I used. Mostly pitch black and slightly less pitch black.
>>54978669
this. SJW thing is another but no biggie enough to switch but fatterfox has become so bloated in recent years.
I use Pale moon for lack of anything better ATM. Chromium just didn't cut it for me and I still think it's bot-netted either by google or the creator himself.
and I can't get Iridium set up on my distro (Xubuntu 16.06)
>>54978485
Ever since you copied Chrome's shitty interface I've swapped over to your sister, Pale Moon.
>>54978485
But I still like you. I loved you since the Firebird days.
>>54979822
userscripts and pentadactyl work with palemoon
I fucking laugh my ass off when I see /g/'s reaction to Firefox these days. You faggots used to suck Mozilla's cock so hard that its balls were always dry. All other browsers were shit, Firefox was better in every way, blah blah.
Then everyone learned that Firefox had been MORE INSECURE THAN FUCKING IE, FOR YEARS. Some of us always knew that, some of us always told you that, but LUL FIREFOX RULEZ. And you installed it on your grandparents computers even though they didn't give a fuck, and you actually got them infected with malware because they never updated the damn thing.
Mozilla Corp. sucked every dollar they could out of that bloated piece of shit. And you guys helped hand it to them on a silver platter. Nice job.
>>54978516
imma need sauce on that anime girl in the corner
>>54978485
i still love you, firefox
Nightly on Android and PC. Some major performance changes you won't find on stable.
Chrome is good but Pale Meme is just silly, /g/. Also, you whine just as much as the SJWs and still haven't seen the irony.
>>54984873
There is no irony. SJWs whine about nonsensical bullshit, we whine because of the nonsensical bullshit SJWs cause.
>>54978485
>>54978611
>Firecucks
>all these "firefox is bad, i switched to botnet" threads
kek
>>54984936
>all these "firefox is great, my wife and her son use it too" posts
kek
46.0.1 reporting in
>>54984025
You can't fuck her, anon! She's a hand drawn figment of some chink's imagination. Wake up Neo, you're dreaming!...
>>54984925
Because of things like this I hate mozilla, but firefox is still the best browser to tweak for privacy
>>54978886
>>deprecated
>>supports more than Firefox
Choose one
>>54978485
You piece of shit, I used to love you and you broke my heart.
I was so pissed of you because you are a slow fucking piece of shit that I switched to Chrome two days ago.
I used you for years after I used Chrome, but nope, not gonna work out.
Don't even give a shit about Google and the NSA, they don't have surectiction in my country anyways.
>>54985229
Enjoy your browsing habits being integrated to your google account
>>54978939
>>54978960
>>54984925
That's false.
Is Chromium free of this spy shit?
I mean it's /g/'s current favorite pet so it should be.
>>54985243
Not using Chrome with my Google account, dipshit.
Actually, I have separate accounts for every Google service.
>>54985262
Not really. You have to get a fork of Chromium that does remove the spying stuff. I don't follow Chromium so I can't recall the fork that actually did this.
>>54985255
https://blog.mozilla.org/blog/2015/12/10/mozilla-open-source-support-first-awards-made/
What did you think was going to happen when you made that post?
>>54985287
Absolute bullshit. There's no "spying stuff" in Chromium and the forks that claim to remove it are a placebo at best and actively harmful at worst, with projects like SRWare Iron being closed source, versus Chromium which is completely open source. You can audit the code yourself, anon. Get on it.
>>54985262
I believe the only botnetty feature about Chromium is that is phones Google whenever someone installs it, but that's it
>>54985328
Let's say I was a fireman and the mayor of the town gave me a $10000 reward for being a town hero in the course of my duties. Now I publicly declare my intention to spend that money hiring painters to remove and paint over graffiti that's affecting the town.
The logic that you're using is that the mayor has paid me $10000 for the purpose of removing the graffiti in town. This is false. Likewise, Mozilla did not hire Buildbot (to the cost of $15000) in order to do some work on some Buildbot documentation. You have committed a non-sequitur logical fallacy.
>>54985484
Holy shit, this is an incredible level of delusion and denial. I'm actually impressed that you can perform those kind of mental gymnastics.
Shame none of it's true. The awardees made submissions for a grant and outlined what they intended to do with the money. You're the only one dealing in fallacies here, friend.
>>54985263
>separate accounts
And they all refer to each other as secondary address, don't they? Try opening google accounts without your phone number
>>54978497
this
i only use it because i can't rice chrome
>>54985552
You sure showed him buddy ;^)
>>54985572
>none on chrome
>one for youtube/google
>one for gmail
>one for gdrive
>one for android
works pretty well
>plugin-container.exe has crashed
>>54985484
That isn't how MOSS works. Projects apply for a grant from it and must submit a proposal that outlines what they plan to do with the money. Trying to suggest that Mozilla didn't know what they planned to do with the money is factually inaccurate and shows that you have no understanding of the MOSS program.
https://wiki.mozilla.org/MOSS
>>54985615
He's 100% correct.
>>54978485
Far better and faster than Chrome
>>54985630
How many phone numbers have you got?
>>54985681
Dude, I made them ages ago, you didn't need a phone number back then.
You NEED one now-a-days?
>>54985708
nope but google recommends it
>>54978485
I'm just waiting for Brave to implement syncing and get a better UI. The code is already in their repo, but it won't be pushed into the main release for another few months.
>browser sync via uuid and asymmetric encryption, with the private key being local only
Can't wait.
>>54981842
It's going to be a bumpy launch.
>>54983928
How is Pale Moon? What version of FF did it fork from? How is it in terms of updates? I heard it was getting a rebase on a newer FF soon.
>>54985657
I didn't suggest that Mozilla did not know where the money was going. What I was implying is that Buildbot's intent on spending the money has no relation to why they were awarded $15000. Buildbot was awarded the money by virtue of running the Buildbot project. I sincerely doubt that Mozilla would care if the Buildbot team decided to buy $15000 worth of pizza and icecream for a celebration party.
>>54985727
The bigger problem is that if you've used them from the same computer or have ever used them at the same time, Google probably has them linked for botnet purposes. Using different accounts won't save you if they know they all belong to you.
>>54985797
Meant to reply to >>54985708
>>54985797
That's not how it works anon, then my little sister would get dad's viagra ad's.
Holy shit, and think of all the people logging in at the library, their fucked.
>>54985832
You would have to log into both several times from the same machine, I'm sure, but I'd be amazed if Google didn't take advantage of such low-hanging fruit.
I've certainly gotten suspicious advertisements, including things I've seen in private browsing, from other accounts, or things my family members are interested in.
Maybe I'm just paranoid, but I think Google is going full botnet.
>>54978562
>trusting swedish scientists
>>54987886
>trusting scientists
>>54988047
> trusting
>>54978485
Firefox 49 with Electrolysis enabled is amazing. This comes from someone who ditched Firefox in 2009 and never looked back. Firefox 47 is an absolute piece of crap, but the upcoming versions will be great.
>>54988901
It's still slow as fuck vs Chrome
>>54988933
>speed
This is the biggest meme in the history of browsers
>>54978485
I still use you for now, but I'm gone the instant you break my no-longer-maintained extensions, which you seem bound and determined to do eventually.
>>54989369
Your no-longer-maintained extensions are already broken by virtue of not being maintained.
>>54989402
They work perfectly fine, actually.
>>54978497
feels ;_;
>>54984025
http://myanimelist.net/character/36074/Erio_Touwa
>>54988933
Slow in terms of what? The UI is finally responsive and doesn't hang up when you put it under a heavy load.
As for page loading times, they are already quite similar. It's only the piece of shit slow UI holding Firefox down.
>>54980953
this desu
>>54989402
The only reason they're broken is because they don't put "Supports firefox 85+" or whatever the new version is in the header
This is prolly a flame/troll thread, but anyone using cyberfox? Dtill uses the majority of mozzarella's code, but removes some of their spaghetti bullshit along with a bunch of performance tweaks
