>all these amdfags waiting for zen >not waiting its successor

Thread replies: 8
Thread images: 2

Anonymous
2016-06-06 03:44:34 Post No. 54936096
[Report] Image search: [Google]

File: 001.jpg (41 KB, 562x437) Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2016-06-06 03:44:34 Post No. 54936096 [Report]

>all these amdfags waiting for zen
>not waiting its successor or getting bristol ridge instead

You do know amd's history about their first gen architecture right? Does barcelona, bulldozer, bobcat and llano rings a bell?

>>

Anonymous 2016-06-06 03:45:10 Post No.54936101
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-06-06 03:45:10 Post No.54936101 [Report]

>AMD
>EVER

>>

Anonymous 2016-06-06 04:18:18 Post No.54936446
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-06-06 04:18:18 Post No.54936446 [Report]

Zen+ will be on AM4, or will there be an AM4/AM4+ socket type?

>>

Anonymous 2016-06-06 05:49:32 Post No.54937216
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-06-06 05:49:32 Post No.54937216 [Report]

>>54936446
Well, if it does a "+" then most likely it will be socket compatible

>>

Anonymous 2016-06-06 05:51:53 Post No.54937231
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-06-06 05:51:53 Post No.54937231 [Report]

Zen is early '17, hey?

Do we have even a hazy timeline for whatever's gonna follow that?

>>

Anonymous 2016-06-06 05:56:10 Post No.54937269
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2016-06-06 05:56:10 Post No.54937269 [Report]

File: .png (214 KB, 351x329) Image search: [Google]

214 KB, 351x329

>>54936101
>implying Athlon wasn't the best CPU of its day

>>

Anonymous 2016-06-06 06:13:08 Post No.54937421
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-06-06 06:13:08 Post No.54937421 [Report]

>>54936101
You must be 18 years or older to post on this site.

>>

Anonymous 2016-06-06 06:25:38 Post No.54937548
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-06-06 06:25:38 Post No.54937548 [Report]

>>54936446
Amd's + sockets are always compatible with non plus ones, so long as they share the same model. Zen+ is just going to be zen but with a slight (15% according to AMD) clock increase.