How does /g/ perform?
>>54889817
>>54889817
Canary 53.0.2757.0 (64-bit)
IE11 11.0.10240.16841 (64-bit)
I used a 10 year old dell notebook which overheated and rebooted during the first take then in the second it got better than 71% of the users. Wtf? People stopped buying computers 10 years ago?
>>54889817
ThinkPad T420s
e5450, fedora 24
I imagine less browsers/monitors would improve the score
>>54891623
same machine but in edge (first was chrome)
Mobile Phone
4670-k with nightly
Surface Book i5 with GPU
Got 53 points, better than 9% of the users...
What the fug
wahey
i7-2600K stock
Radeon HD 5670 (waiting for the RX 480 to hit)
FF Nightly 49a1
R9 280X
2560x1600
Firefox 46.0.1
Windows 10
i5 4460
280x
>Macs are shit
No reason to upgrade
>>54894076
>better than 99% on your os/browser
not exactly proof of much, m8
>>54895450
Are you retarded? Exactly 1 line above what you read it says that he scored in the 99th percentile for all users.
Guess I win, arch with chromium
4790k
980
4770k @ 4.4ghz + 970. using chrome on windows 10
>>54889817
iPhone 6s. Better than I expected.
ArchLoonix
FX-8150
GTX 560 Ti
Chromium 51.0.2704.63
i5 4460 & GTX960 SC
While running a game in background
>>54896550
Is that Blackbox? How do you get that theme
>>54895707
That doesn't void the statement by the person you're replying to.
You seem to be lacking an understanding of statistics, newfriend.
>>54896550
>Kraftwerk
>reddit & Facebook
aaahh so conflicting
Also this is on HD 7850 and i3 6100
>>54896250
3570k at 4.4ghz and got same shit as you on chromium debian
gtx760
& people cry about amd performance.. faggots
AMD A10-7850k
R9 290
not bad?
okay I suppose
>>54896550
What theme is that on Firefox?
opera beta on xubuntu 14.04 64bit with an intel i7.
>>54889817
Canvas and webgl are cancer. Anything that brings us closer to a future where nobody actually has copies of their programs is bad for society. Let's just ignore the accessibility issues for everywhere that isn't the united states of just buy a new computer for a second.
>>54889817
Ran it on my main potato.
better than 47% of all on firefox, 512 Points
better than 39% of all on internet explorer (for good measure), forgot the score.
But it doesn't render particles in FF. Also Anti Aliasing neither in FF nor IE.
>>54889817
Oneplus X
>>54889817
>Chrome latest
>Windows 7
>4690k @ 4.5Ghz
>Sapphire R9 390
AMD Phenom II x4 965 Black Edition
8GB DDR3
GTX 570 DirectCUII
Windows 10, Latest Chrome version
>>54900867
>mac
>chrome
>adblock plus
absolutely an hero worthy
>>54889817
4690k @ 4.7 with an r9 290 using chrome.
>>54901489
here's your (You)
OS: Ubuntu
Browser: Firefox
>>54889817
5K iMac with i5-6500, m390 and streaming on Safari.
i5 4460
Intel HD 4600
8 GB RAM
Windows 10 and Chrome
Opera 12.16
C2D E8335
Radeon HD 2600 Pro
>>54889817
> /g/
>how to take a screenshot
>>54902786
whoops
>>54902820
How new are you?
>>54902820
Is joek
Galaxy S3 CM 13
idk if this is good compared to the rest of /g/'s or not
What I do know is that the test took way too friggin long
That's not bad.
i5k 4.6GHz
16GB
GTX970
Was able to get a much better score when forcing all cores to max freq, before that I was in the 2300 range.
>>54895754
Flawless victory, annon
>>54889817
>>54889817
Chromium 50 on 4.3.0 running on a T420.
>>54889817
T420 didn't seem to fair too bad.
That's pretty good
MBP 2012 i5 8gb
>>54896853
>>54898284
Nightly Fox stylish theme with custom picked colours. It leaves some artifacts behind when you alt tab like you can see on the top left corner of adress bar sometimes though its not perfect.
>>54889817
Firefox's and Chrome's
>>54889817
This was on FireFox
>>54889817
too lazy to type that url but not too lazy to write this.
>>54901568
ITS THAT GUY WITH THE BIG ASS MONITOR
>having webgl enabled
>>>/out/
Macbook Pro with Iris Pro integrated graphics.
>>54889817
Nexus 10, Chromium 53
>>54909948
And a lot of private tabs on the background
iPhone 5 16gig, 9.3.2
>>54889817
Nexus 5, Opera Beta 37(Chromium 50)
I tested Edge, IE11, FF48 in Windows and Linux(FF only). Here's the first one
>>54910437
IE11 on Windows 10
>>54910456
Firefox 48, on W10
And the last one, Firefox(or Lagfox?) on Debian testing
>canvas and webgl
this site is collecting browser fingerprints to identify people.
>pale meme
>debian
>10 year old pentium laptop (T43p)
i5 4690
Chrome 64-Bit
Win 10
here is my score 100% better than people with my my browser/os, firefox/win10
96% better than over all, pretty good?
ubuntu 16.04 using open source AMD drivers. Not great results.
>>54889817
i don't know since you didn't even provide the FUCKING LINK
Based iPad mini
Okay, I guess
>>54911099
Liturlly in the url in the jpg in the urlbar.
>>54889817
Sony Expedia E4g Chrome
Got better than 82% of all users
But only 60% or so on people that use the same OS/Browser
Benchmark sucked, I was at like 38% CPU utilization the whole time.
>thought it was a coding test
>it's a shitty hardware test
disappointed, but then again i shouldn't be surprised seeing the poster turnout
OP here, I'm surprised to see my thread still going after 24 hours. Anyway, can you guess my cpu/gpu setup from the score?
iPhone SE - 370/408/576/535 on Safari, 40/49/20/20 on Opera
Old Insprion 530, running Debian and a Q6600 (incl. graphics) - 275/285/14/156 on Opera, 183/90/12/30 on Iceweasel, and I'm pretty sure Iceweasel had rendering errors.
>>54901827
Anon, please get a higher res wallpaper, this made my eyes melt
>>54892307
Same CPU here, mate.
Otter Browser 0.9.09
Windows 10
i7 4790k
Fury
