Which would you take? 4K @60hz or 1440p at 144hz? I havent seen anywhere that breaks it down they just say here is the best 4k monitor here is the best 1440p 60hz monitor and be done with it. Does the refresh rate really matter that much?
>>54883891
4k@144hz
144hz is a meme unless you wanna be some ub3r pro csgo gaymer. i use a 144hz monitor right beside a 60hz monitor everyday and cant tell a fucking difference unless i pull up some online blurbusters test or something. i wish i had just gotten a higher res ips panel
I'd take the 4K, sell it, use a third of the cash to buy the 1440p, and blow the rest on your mum
4k@30
>>54883977
Stfu you retarded bigot. You either are a troll, a disinformationist or simply uninformed. Besides the fact that you've never experienced side by side refresh rate differences, you clearly don't even understand it on a fundamental because if you would understand how the eye differentiates light flashing at your fucking being you would know it's noticeable.
Fuck you.
>>54884193
not even trolling. i have an asus vg248qe and an asus VS247H-P. shits a meme
>>54884053
True kinophile
>>54884299
lol did you even change your refresh rate to 144hz?
>>54883891
Depends, assuming you have the gpu to run go for a 4k 60hz, the increased detail is worth it. Plus it looks better when you aren't gaming.
>>54884369
yes. i can see a difference if i go on the blurbusters site and run some tests or drag some windows around really fast. it just wasn't worth the extra ~$100 i spent on it imo and i'd rather have nicer colors and more workspace. maybe if you play a lot of online shooter games it'd be worth it. i only really play the occasional rpg
>>54883891
4k@60.
What i really want is that dell multi view one that is a single 4k monitor, but can run as 4 1080p screens.
>>54883891
144hz all day, any day
>>54883891
OP here. I just yolo'd and bought the Dell S2716DG off of amazon. I already have a 4k TV and I just didnt care that much for it, so i decided on higher framerate.
>>54884424
You're a fucking idiot and your eyesight is shit. 60 hz anything is fucking cancer tier.
>>54884586
I'm not him, but I'm 30 and not some gaymur child using mommy and dad money.
I have the Asus vg24, 144hz and a Dell U3415W ultra wide 3440x1440 60hz. Though there is clearly a difference in 60 hz vs 144hz when talking ghosting, that is where it stops. Setting your monitor to 144hz vs 100hz is dumb though. Visibly you cannot tell any difference in the two.
I bet you're the retard praising BenQ 1ms and saying 5ms is a world of difference.
>>54884630
Basically this.
>>54883891
Anything above 60hz is meme. I have 144hz. No difference.
>>54883891
If 1080p@240hz came out right now, I'd sell my 1440p@144hz in a heart beat.
Seamless non jittering scrolling, yeeee
>>54883891
Depends on input delay. In a perfect world where delay is but 10ms, I'd take the 4k. But purely because I play fighting games a lot and 144hz is useless.
>>54884765
Is it really though? Is pro FPS players using them just a sponsor thing or what?
>>54884979
Yes, it is free advertising basically. How do you think Nike sells shoes. Basketball players in the NBA wear Nike. Futbol/soccer players wear Adidas and Puma.
>>54884630
I'm not that guy you're talking about but your opinion is still shit. Although I do play some games, I'm 31 and don't give a shit about leet gamer gear. Being into gaming and appreciating high refresh rates don't necessarily go hand in hand. I have the vg24 too and although I agree that 144 vs 100 is getting into that gray area where it is difficult to tell a difference, there is no way in hell I'd ever go all the way back to using a 60 hz monitor, for anything, ever. You have shit taste, lmaoing @ ur life.
>>54884765
>No difference
>I have 144
Then you clearly don't.
I bought one to see what the hype was about, noticed the change immediately in a cursor, of all things.
Games especially so, but the colour reproduction and chifting at angles couldn't do it for me, so I sold it off.
Don't come here and lie, saying you own one and see no difference.
>>54884749
>>54884765
>>54885005
Low test 60hz eyesight faggots ITT
4k
anything about 60 is for professional gaymers
>>54885041
>you have shit taste because I can't afford what you can and so I think my stuff which is inexpensive and you said you have the same object but mine is better. My opinion is better than yours.
-the post
>>54883891
144Hz of course. It makes a huge difference even for general desktop use. I'd take 1080p240 if it was available.
People saying it makes no difference are literally too stupid to enable the higher refresh rate (pic related).
>>54885120
That had never entered as a possibility.
I'd assumed that anyone who didn't noticed a difference was either blind or just too retarded to notice and thus their opinion of the refresh rate was invalid, but no knowing how to change the refresh rate is so much worse.
>>54885120
If you're a man, you won't back out of your word pussy
>>54885111
I wouldn't trade 144hz for a meme resolution like 4k until it advances beyond 60hz. I could afford a few dozen 4k monitors if I wanted, has nothing to do with that. Keep trying to justify the purchase of your 4k/60hz monitor that will be le trashman'd in a year or two when 120+ hz panels start rolling out by falsely stating that 144hz isn't a big deal.
>>54885173
I mean real 240Hz, not interpolated bullshit.
>>54885173
>Was 399.95
>Is 399.95
>>54885202
I said I have a 3440x1440 @60hz
1920x1080 @144hz
Also didn't mention the 4096x2160 @ 120hz LG
>>54885202
It's funny because we had 120hz CRT monitors in the early 2000s. Yet here we are where 60hz is the standard and will be for 95% of consumers. You're thinking like a gaymur and not a business.
>>54885261
How is it possible that you own decent monitors and have such stupid opinions?
>>54885279
How am I thinking like a gaymer? Higher refresh rate is better for everything, not just gayming. It's a myth that the average person can't see the difference between the two.
>>54885316
>refresh rate is better for viewing text
you try way too hard
>>54883891
1440p @144Hz.
>Does the refresh rate really matter that much?
Yes. It's just much smoother. You really need to test for yourself. Once you've had a 144 Hz display you'll never want to go back to 60 Hz.
>>54885335
>Once you pay the extra for a 144Hz display you will never let anyone forget you think you are better than them
:^)
>>54885349
>I'm poor and I like to trash talk superior technology because I can't afford it
:^)
>>54885392
>Poor
thanks for proving my point 100%.
>>54885394
You didn't have a point. You're just whining about there not being a difference between 144 Hz and 60 Hz because you either haven't tested it yourself or you can't afford it.
>>54885316
>your opinion is stupid because I don't agree
>opinion
That's why mine are stupid, because they don't agree with what you say and you don't like it. So you use negativity to try and counterbalance anything I say.
1: I own decent displays
2: I own a decent PC
3: I'm very much in shape and pretty strong too
4: I own a home
5: I have good credit
Why does all of this make you negative towards me? Because I disagree? How old are you?
>>54885411
There is no point in using 144hz for anything other than games.
If you aren't playing games, you would benefit more from 4k than high refresh rate when viewing mostly static content.
Nice try though kid.
>>54884424
That's funny because I can tell the difference instantly with the added input lag on my mouse at 60hz.
Can't even play rts games it's so bad compared to 144hz
>>54883891
4k@60hz every single time.
60 fps is more than enough smoothness for me, and 4k's resolution jump over 1440 is far more noticeable.
>>54885316
>Higher refresh rate is better for everything, not just gayming
This was true when people used CRTs, but no more, faggot.
1440 and 144hz easily.
144hz monitors have ruined my brain. I cannot enjoy 60 fps any more.
1440p@144hz with frame syncing.
>>54884299
>being so downs you can't see faster framerates
this explains a lot about consolescum.
>>54884502
Boughy the same thing myself last week, you made the right choice.
Jesus, as a graphic artist, what the fuck should I focus on and buy ? I know it must be a LED Ips screen but what else ? How do you judge color accuracy and contrasts ?
Also I dont really care for resolution or refresh rate.
>>54885418
>3: I'm very much in shape and pretty strong too
>4: I own a home
>5: I have good credit
>things that we give a flying fuck about
>>54883891
3440x1440 @ 75 hz + gsync / freesync
>>54883891
4k@60hz since 144hz is fucking useless for Internet browsing, coding, graphism, video editing... Well, most of things PCs are for.
>>54883891
8k @ 15hz
144Hz, but only if it means i don't have to deal with TN colour shifting bullshit.
4K if it scales well, if the monitor is large, if i have a desk big enough to sit far enough to be comfortable, if i can run games at high settings at this res. too many ifs.
>>54886921
Not there for you to care. It sure triggered you though for no reason at all
4K 60hz
Mainly because I've never had something bigger than 1440p (VSR). 1440 is a pretty big increase from my 1080p. I suspect the 4K is an even large for my visual cues.
>>54885349
le cinematic experience :^)
>>54883891
4k with good colors at 60hz for sure.
Cheap secondary monitor for more side-space.
You cannot run games at 144 hz on 4k with any additional screens unless you're spending a fortune on graphics cards or neutering your games to low quality graphics (defeating the entire purpose of spending so fucking much on a 4k monitor)
When your inferior setup can only render 60fps on that 144hz monitor because the card can't keep up, you're getting no extra motion smoothness, except your colors are now far uglier because it's not an IPS panel.
4k 144 is Worst of both worlds unless you have a trust fund graphics card setup.
>>54883891
I have both and anything after 60hz only matters if you are really into shooters.
I never have been but its the only games I can get above 60 consistently no matter what card running a 980ti now overclocked and hybrid cooled.
>>54884193
>>54884299
>>54883977
I am with this guy. I have the korean 40 inch 4k 60hz next to a 1440p 144hz freesync monitor. The only difference happens if you are a csgo devotee.
>>54890073
>using the smiley with a carat nose
>>54890220
OP here, I just got a GTX 1080 FE (good goy etc) and im pretty sure it can push 144hz and 1440p fairly easily and even 4k @60hz
I've been through 4 Asus PG279Q's, and they've all been garbage. Most of them have had bleed problems and all of them have had a noticeable yellow tinge to them on brighter colors, you can see the shades change as you scroll up and down a webpage. Is there a 1440p IPS monitor with a meme refresh rate that doesn't have total shit quality control? I know Acer has a very similar model but they apparently use the same panel manufacturer as Asus, which has been the source of the trouble so far.
>>54883977
>144hz is a meme unless you wanna be some ub3r pro csgo gaymer. i use a 144hz monitor right beside a 60hz monitor everyday and cant tell a fucking difference unless i pull up some online blurbusters test or something. i wish i had just gotten a higher res ips panel
Get your eyes checked. I have a 120Hz display next to a 60Hz display and you only need to scroll in a browser to notice the huge difference. 60Hz is just not smooth.
http://www.tftcentral.co.uk/news_archive/35.htm#asus_prototype
>Asus Prototype - The First 4K 144Hz Monitor with DP 1.3
IT'S HAPPENING
>>54883891
I have a 4k running on dual 980ti's
Its beautiful OP I can't go back
Just make sure you have the horsepower for it
>>54885261
Wut? They make 4k120hz monitors now? Is it 4-4-2 or 4-4-4?
